Xing-Yu Ji
(, ), Jia-Qi Zhu
(, ), Ke Wu
(, ), Liu Wang
(, ), Tian-Yuan Xiong
(, ), Li Zhang
(, ), Mao Chen
(, )
{"title":"Soft robotic devices for cardiovascular medicine","authors":"Xing-Yu Ji \n (, ), Jia-Qi Zhu \n (, ), Ke Wu \n (, ), Liu Wang \n (, ), Tian-Yuan Xiong \n (, ), Li Zhang \n (, ), Mao Chen \n (, )","doi":"10.1038/s41569-026-01287-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Conventional, rigid simulators and therapeutic devices for cardiovascular disease have several fundamental limitations, such as poor biomimetic fidelity, substantial surgical invasiveness and mismatch at the tissue–device interface. Soft robotic devices, with tissue-like materials, structures and functions, are emerging as promising alternatives. In this Review, by matching clinical demands to technological breakthroughs, we identify three emerging complementary frontiers in which soft robotic devices are redefining cardiovascular medicine — soft robotic simulators, such as in vitro ventricular simulators and in vivo assistive simulators; soft robotic interventional instruments, such as percutaneous instruments, endovascular continuum instruments and untethered mini-scale robots; and soft robotic implants for vascular disease, arrhythmia and heart failure. We describe the unique advantages of soft robotic devices as well as their applicable scope and technical implementation. Finally, we highlight promising technological opportunities for next-generation soft cardiac devices, evaluate the clinical maturity of existing devices and propose a translational roadmap for the coming decade. With this Review, we aim to foster further integration of soft robotics into cardiovascular medicine by identifying device solutions with translational potential to address unmet clinical needs. Soft robotic devices, with tissue-like materials, structures and functions, are emerging as promising alternatives to rigid devices for cardiovascular disease, which have several fundamental limitations. In this Review, Ji and colleagues discuss three emerging frontiers in which soft robotic devices are redefining cardiovascular medicine: simulators, interventional instruments and implants for vascular disease, arrhythmia and heart failure.","PeriodicalId":18976,"journal":{"name":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","volume":"23 11","pages":"769-787"},"PeriodicalIF":50.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Reviews Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.nature.com/articles/s41569-026-01287-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Conventional, rigid simulators and therapeutic devices for cardiovascular disease have several fundamental limitations, such as poor biomimetic fidelity, substantial surgical invasiveness and mismatch at the tissue–device interface. Soft robotic devices, with tissue-like materials, structures and functions, are emerging as promising alternatives. In this Review, by matching clinical demands to technological breakthroughs, we identify three emerging complementary frontiers in which soft robotic devices are redefining cardiovascular medicine — soft robotic simulators, such as in vitro ventricular simulators and in vivo assistive simulators; soft robotic interventional instruments, such as percutaneous instruments, endovascular continuum instruments and untethered mini-scale robots; and soft robotic implants for vascular disease, arrhythmia and heart failure. We describe the unique advantages of soft robotic devices as well as their applicable scope and technical implementation. Finally, we highlight promising technological opportunities for next-generation soft cardiac devices, evaluate the clinical maturity of existing devices and propose a translational roadmap for the coming decade. With this Review, we aim to foster further integration of soft robotics into cardiovascular medicine by identifying device solutions with translational potential to address unmet clinical needs. Soft robotic devices, with tissue-like materials, structures and functions, are emerging as promising alternatives to rigid devices for cardiovascular disease, which have several fundamental limitations. In this Review, Ji and colleagues discuss three emerging frontiers in which soft robotic devices are redefining cardiovascular medicine: simulators, interventional instruments and implants for vascular disease, arrhythmia and heart failure.
期刊介绍:
Nature Reviews Cardiology aims to be the go-to source for reviews and commentaries in the scientific and clinical communities it serves. Focused on providing authoritative and accessible articles enriched with clear figures and tables, the journal strives to offer unparalleled service to authors, referees, and readers, maximizing the usefulness and impact of each publication. It covers a broad range of content types, including Research Highlights, Comments, News & Views, Reviews, Consensus Statements, and Perspectives, catering to practising cardiologists and cardiovascular research scientists. Authored by renowned clinicians, academics, and researchers, the content targets readers in the biological and medical sciences, ensuring accessibility across various disciplines. In-depth Reviews offer up-to-date information, while Consensus Statements provide evidence-based recommendations. Perspectives and News & Views present topical discussions and opinions, and the Research Highlights section filters primary research from cardiovascular and general medical journals. As part of the Nature Reviews portfolio, Nature Reviews Cardiology maintains high standards and a wide reach.