M Amiri, M Cheraghi, M J Nasiri, D R Silva, G Sotgiu, L D'Ambrosio, R Centis, I Kontsevaya, H K Gandhi, D Oberdhan, V Girbinger, M Dara
{"title":"Safety of treatment regimens for drug-resistant TB over a 15-year period: a scoping review.","authors":"M Amiri, M Cheraghi, M J Nasiri, D R Silva, G Sotgiu, L D'Ambrosio, R Centis, I Kontsevaya, H K Gandhi, D Oberdhan, V Girbinger, M Dara","doi":"10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A previous review summarised the evolution and efficacy of the regimens to treat rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB), underscoring the persistent need for efficacious shorter treatments. The aim of this scoping review was to explore safety, quality of life (QoL), and unmet needs associated with RR/MDR-TB in studies published between 2009 and 2024.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies reporting safety, QoL, and unmet needs in the last 15 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-seven studies including 9,874 patients were identified, with significant variation in geographic distribution, sample size, and other core variables. The overall proportion of serious adverse events (AEs) ranged between 0.2% and 10.1% in retrospective studies, 1.0%-72.4% in prospective cohorts, and 20.0%-25.0% in experimental studies, with no data on QoL. Almost all studies containing linezolid (LZD) reported gastrointestinal and haematological AEs. In studies based on individual patient data, AEs associated with bedaquiline (1.7%-2.4%) and fluoroquinolones (3%-4%) were less frequent than those associated with LZD (14.1%-17.2%). The World Health Organization 95% credible interval range was 10.1%-27.0%.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While efficacious RR/MDR-TB regimens are recommended, individual drugs still cause AEs potentially leading to decreased adherence. New efficacious treatments with improved safety/tolerability profiles are needed.</p>","PeriodicalId":519984,"journal":{"name":"IJTLD open","volume":"3 4","pages":"208-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13080302/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJTLD open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5588/ijtldopen.25.0728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: A previous review summarised the evolution and efficacy of the regimens to treat rifampicin-resistant/multidrug-resistant TB (RR/MDR-TB), underscoring the persistent need for efficacious shorter treatments. The aim of this scoping review was to explore safety, quality of life (QoL), and unmet needs associated with RR/MDR-TB in studies published between 2009 and 2024.
Methods: We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, Scopus, and Web of Science for studies reporting safety, QoL, and unmet needs in the last 15 years.
Results: Fifty-seven studies including 9,874 patients were identified, with significant variation in geographic distribution, sample size, and other core variables. The overall proportion of serious adverse events (AEs) ranged between 0.2% and 10.1% in retrospective studies, 1.0%-72.4% in prospective cohorts, and 20.0%-25.0% in experimental studies, with no data on QoL. Almost all studies containing linezolid (LZD) reported gastrointestinal and haematological AEs. In studies based on individual patient data, AEs associated with bedaquiline (1.7%-2.4%) and fluoroquinolones (3%-4%) were less frequent than those associated with LZD (14.1%-17.2%). The World Health Organization 95% credible interval range was 10.1%-27.0%.
Conclusion: While efficacious RR/MDR-TB regimens are recommended, individual drugs still cause AEs potentially leading to decreased adherence. New efficacious treatments with improved safety/tolerability profiles are needed.