Effect of social interaction negative affect on within-person mentalizing network connectivity.

IF 3.1
Alicia Vallorani, Marisa N Lytle, Morgan Gilmer, Melissa Bomberger, Michael N Hallquist, Koraly Pérez-Edgar
{"title":"Effect of social interaction negative affect on within-person mentalizing network connectivity.","authors":"Alicia Vallorani, Marisa N Lytle, Morgan Gilmer, Melissa Bomberger, Michael N Hallquist, Koraly Pérez-Edgar","doi":"10.1093/scan/nsag027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Understanding others' intentions and emotions is supported by the mentalizing network, helping people navigate the inherently complex dynamics of social interactions. However, work investigating the mentalizing network often relies on non-naturalistic methods, limiting our understanding of individual differences most apparent within social interaction contexts. We took a naturalistic, multilevel approach to investigate relations between real-world affective expressions, social anxiety symptoms and mentalizing network connectivity. Same gender-identity friend pairs (40 participants; 62.5% Women; 87.5% White) engaged in a social interaction while videos from their individual visual perspectives were recorded. Participants were later scanned while they watched clips of the interaction from their own (self run) and their friend's (friend run) perspective. We found that expressed negative affect, not expressed positive affect, related to within-person variation in mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives. Further, participants higher in social anxiety symptoms showed more consistent mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives when expressed negative affect was higher than average, and particularly when friend negative affect expressions, rather than their own negative affect expressions, were higher. Mentalizing network connectivity may be responsive to shifts in negative affect during social interactions and individuals with higher social anxiety may find negative affect from a friend particularly salient.</p>","PeriodicalId":94208,"journal":{"name":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13166882/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social cognitive and affective neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsag027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding others' intentions and emotions is supported by the mentalizing network, helping people navigate the inherently complex dynamics of social interactions. However, work investigating the mentalizing network often relies on non-naturalistic methods, limiting our understanding of individual differences most apparent within social interaction contexts. We took a naturalistic, multilevel approach to investigate relations between real-world affective expressions, social anxiety symptoms and mentalizing network connectivity. Same gender-identity friend pairs (40 participants; 62.5% Women; 87.5% White) engaged in a social interaction while videos from their individual visual perspectives were recorded. Participants were later scanned while they watched clips of the interaction from their own (self run) and their friend's (friend run) perspective. We found that expressed negative affect, not expressed positive affect, related to within-person variation in mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives. Further, participants higher in social anxiety symptoms showed more consistent mentalizing network connectivity across perspectives when expressed negative affect was higher than average, and particularly when friend negative affect expressions, rather than their own negative affect expressions, were higher. Mentalizing network connectivity may be responsive to shifts in negative affect during social interactions and individuals with higher social anxiety may find negative affect from a friend particularly salient.

社会互动负性影响对人际心理网络连通性的影响。
心智化网络支持理解他人的意图和情绪,帮助人们驾驭内在复杂的社会互动动态。然而,研究心智化网络的工作往往依赖于非自然主义的方法,限制了我们对社会互动环境中最明显的个体差异的理解。我们采用自然的、多层次的方法来研究现实世界情感表达、社交焦虑症状和心理网络连接之间的关系。性别认同相同的朋友对(40名参与者,62.5%为女性,87.5%为白人)进行社交互动,同时从他们个人的视觉角度录制视频。随后,研究人员对参与者进行扫描,同时让他们从自己和朋友的角度观看互动片段。我们发现,消极情绪的表达,而非积极情绪的表达,与心理网络连接的个人内部差异有关。此外,当表达的负面情绪高于平均水平时,特别是当朋友的负面情绪表达高于自己的负面情绪表达时,社交焦虑症状较高的参与者表现出更一致的跨视角心理网络连通性。心理网络连接可能会对社交互动中负面影响的变化做出反应,社交焦虑程度较高的个体可能会发现来自朋友的负面影响特别突出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书