Claire O'Malley, Callum Bradford, Jordan Duffy, Helen J Moore, Andrea Burrows, Joe Dunne, Lisa Harris, Frances Hillier-Brown, Matthew Cotton, Lucie Nield, Amelia A Lake
{"title":"Exploring the Role of Social Supermarkets in Addressing Food Insecurity and Food Waste: A Scoping Review.","authors":"Claire O'Malley, Callum Bradford, Jordan Duffy, Helen J Moore, Andrea Burrows, Joe Dunne, Lisa Harris, Frances Hillier-Brown, Matthew Cotton, Lucie Nield, Amelia A Lake","doi":"10.1111/nbu.70053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Tackling food insecurity and food waste are two interrelated and complex policy challenges. Innovations in food retail termed 'social supermarkets' (SSMs) could provide a solution, utilising surplus produce from mainstream food retailers, which are then traded at reduced prices. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the peer-reviewed research literature concerning the application of SSM models internationally, with a particular focus on how they influence food insecurity and reduce food waste. Free-text keywords and index terms were combined with Boolean operators for comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Fourteen studies were included after duplication removal, sifting and results from citation searches were added. SSMs were primarily used by low-income, food-insecure households, although some clients do not fall under these categories, instead choosing to shop at SSMs to prevent further societal food waste from unused surplus. Attitudes towards SSMs were predominantly positive (especially in comparison to food banks), largely due to the implementation of the choice model, where clients are treated as 'customers' rather than 'recipients' of food. Although SSMs play an important role in providing food assistance to the food insecure and preventing surplus food from supermarket retailers becoming food waste, they do not address the deeper underlying causes of food insecurity and food waste, namely: income inequality and the on-going creation of surplus food throughout the food supply chain. Policies are needed which address these issues directly, unlike SSMs, which paradoxically rely on these increasingly dysfunctional systems to continue trading.</p>","PeriodicalId":48536,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition Bulletin","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/nbu.70053","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Tackling food insecurity and food waste are two interrelated and complex policy challenges. Innovations in food retail termed 'social supermarkets' (SSMs) could provide a solution, utilising surplus produce from mainstream food retailers, which are then traded at reduced prices. This scoping review aimed to synthesise the peer-reviewed research literature concerning the application of SSM models internationally, with a particular focus on how they influence food insecurity and reduce food waste. Free-text keywords and index terms were combined with Boolean operators for comprehensive searches of MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Google Scholar. Fourteen studies were included after duplication removal, sifting and results from citation searches were added. SSMs were primarily used by low-income, food-insecure households, although some clients do not fall under these categories, instead choosing to shop at SSMs to prevent further societal food waste from unused surplus. Attitudes towards SSMs were predominantly positive (especially in comparison to food banks), largely due to the implementation of the choice model, where clients are treated as 'customers' rather than 'recipients' of food. Although SSMs play an important role in providing food assistance to the food insecure and preventing surplus food from supermarket retailers becoming food waste, they do not address the deeper underlying causes of food insecurity and food waste, namely: income inequality and the on-going creation of surplus food throughout the food supply chain. Policies are needed which address these issues directly, unlike SSMs, which paradoxically rely on these increasingly dysfunctional systems to continue trading.
应对粮食不安全和粮食浪费是两项相互关联的复杂政策挑战。被称为“社会超市”(SSMs)的食品零售创新可以提供一个解决方案,利用主流食品零售商的剩余产品,然后以降价交易。这一范围审查的目的是综合同行评议的关于SSM模型在国际上应用的研究文献,特别关注它们如何影响粮食不安全和减少粮食浪费。结合自由文本关键字和索引词与布尔运算符进行MEDLINE、Embase、Cochrane、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO和谷歌Scholar的综合搜索。在删除重复、筛选和引文检索结果后,纳入了14项研究。ssm主要由低收入、粮食不安全的家庭使用,尽管一些客户不属于这些类别,而是选择在ssm购物,以防止未使用的剩余进一步造成社会食物浪费。对ssm的态度主要是积极的(特别是与食物银行相比),这主要是由于选择模式的实施,客户被视为“客户”而不是食物的“接受者”。虽然SSMs在向粮食不安全人群提供粮食援助和防止超市零售商的剩余粮食成为食物浪费方面发挥着重要作用,但它们并没有解决粮食不安全和食物浪费的更深层次的根本原因,即:收入不平等和整个粮食供应链中不断产生的剩余粮食。我们需要直接解决这些问题的政策,而不像ssm,它矛盾地依赖于这些功能日益失调的系统来继续交易。
期刊介绍:
The Nutrition Bulletin provides accessible reviews at the cutting edge of research. Read by researchers and nutritionists working in universities and research institutes; public health nutritionists, dieticians and other health professionals; nutritionists, technologists and others in the food industry; those engaged in higher education including students; and journalists with an interest in nutrition.