Influence of Habitual Tongue Posture on Tongue Pressure During Swallowing.

IF 4 3区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Liqin Wang, Kentaro Okuno, Ayako Masago, Ryuichiro Kobuchi, Kazuhiro Murakami, Kazuhiro Hori, Kazuya Takahashi
{"title":"Influence of Habitual Tongue Posture on Tongue Pressure During Swallowing.","authors":"Liqin Wang, Kentaro Okuno, Ayako Masago, Ryuichiro Kobuchi, Kazuhiro Murakami, Kazuhiro Hori, Kazuya Takahashi","doi":"10.1111/joor.70206","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Tongue pressure is essential for bolus transport and oral stability during swallowing and serves as a clinical marker of tongue function. Habitual tongue posture, defined as the resting position of the tongue, is associated with swallowing efficiency and craniofacial development.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study investigated the association between habitual tongue posture and regional tongue pressure amplitudes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We enrolled 52 healthy adult participants (26.0 [24.0-27.0] years). Habitual tongue posture was evaluated using standardised lateral cephalometric radiographs, measuring tongue-palate (T-P) and mandible-hyoid distances. Based on the mean T-P value, participants were divided into long-distance (LD) and short-distance (SD) groups. Tongue pressure during 5 mL water swallowing was measured using a tactile sensor system with five sensor points (Ch1-5).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Intra-group analysis revealed significantly lower pressure at Ch3 (2.1 [0.7-4.5] kPa) than at Ch4 (5.6 [2.0-9.9] kPa, p = 0.0286) and Ch5 (8.1 [3.8-15.7] kPa, p < 0.0001) in the LD group. Inter-group comparisons showed that the LD group had significantly lower tongue pressure than the SD group at Ch2 (3.2 [1.5-6.5] kPa vs. 6.8 [4.6-14.7] kPa, p = 0.0018), Ch3 (2.1 [0.7-4.5] kPa vs. 10.6 [6.0-21.2] kPa, p < 0.0001), and Ch4 (5.6 [2.0-9.9] kPa vs. 9.8 [5.5-11.8] kPa, p = 0.0203).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our findings suggest that habitual low tongue posture impairs swallowing efficiency by reducing tongue pressure in certain areas, posing a risk for age-related dysphagia and swallowing difficulties.</p>","PeriodicalId":16605,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/joor.70206","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Tongue pressure is essential for bolus transport and oral stability during swallowing and serves as a clinical marker of tongue function. Habitual tongue posture, defined as the resting position of the tongue, is associated with swallowing efficiency and craniofacial development.

Objective: This study investigated the association between habitual tongue posture and regional tongue pressure amplitudes.

Methods: We enrolled 52 healthy adult participants (26.0 [24.0-27.0] years). Habitual tongue posture was evaluated using standardised lateral cephalometric radiographs, measuring tongue-palate (T-P) and mandible-hyoid distances. Based on the mean T-P value, participants were divided into long-distance (LD) and short-distance (SD) groups. Tongue pressure during 5 mL water swallowing was measured using a tactile sensor system with five sensor points (Ch1-5).

Results: Intra-group analysis revealed significantly lower pressure at Ch3 (2.1 [0.7-4.5] kPa) than at Ch4 (5.6 [2.0-9.9] kPa, p = 0.0286) and Ch5 (8.1 [3.8-15.7] kPa, p < 0.0001) in the LD group. Inter-group comparisons showed that the LD group had significantly lower tongue pressure than the SD group at Ch2 (3.2 [1.5-6.5] kPa vs. 6.8 [4.6-14.7] kPa, p = 0.0018), Ch3 (2.1 [0.7-4.5] kPa vs. 10.6 [6.0-21.2] kPa, p < 0.0001), and Ch4 (5.6 [2.0-9.9] kPa vs. 9.8 [5.5-11.8] kPa, p = 0.0203).

Conclusion: Our findings suggest that habitual low tongue posture impairs swallowing efficiency by reducing tongue pressure in certain areas, posing a risk for age-related dysphagia and swallowing difficulties.

吞咽时习惯性舌位对舌压的影响。
背景:舌压在吞咽过程中对丸剂运输和口腔稳定至关重要,是舌功能的临床标志。习惯性的舌头姿势,定义为舌头的休息位置,与吞咽效率和颅面发育有关。目的:探讨习惯舌位与舌区压力振幅的关系。方法:我们招募了52名健康成人,年龄为26.0[24.0-27.0]岁。使用标准化侧位头颅x线片,测量舌-腭(T-P)和下颌-舌骨距离来评估习惯性舌位。根据平均T-P值将参与者分为长距离组(LD)和短距离组(SD)。使用具有5个传感器点的触觉传感器系统(Ch1-5)测量5 mL水吞咽过程中的舌压。结果:组内分析显示Ch3压力(2.1 [0.7-4.5]kPa)明显低于Ch4压力(5.6 [2.0-9.9]kPa, p = 0.0286)和Ch5压力(8.1 [3.8-15.7]kPa, p)。结论:习惯性低舌位会降低某些区域的舌压,从而降低吞咽效率,增加与年龄相关的吞咽困难和吞咽困难的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of oral rehabilitation
Journal of oral rehabilitation 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
10.30%
发文量
116
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Oral Rehabilitation aims to be the most prestigious journal of dental research within all aspects of oral rehabilitation and applied oral physiology. It covers all diagnostic and clinical management aspects necessary to re-establish a subjective and objective harmonious oral function. Oral rehabilitation may become necessary as a result of developmental or acquired disturbances in the orofacial region, orofacial traumas, or a variety of dental and oral diseases (primarily dental caries and periodontal diseases) and orofacial pain conditions. As such, oral rehabilitation in the twenty-first century is a matter of skilful diagnosis and minimal, appropriate intervention, the nature of which is intimately linked to a profound knowledge of oral physiology, oral biology, and dental and oral pathology. The scientific content of the journal therefore strives to reflect the best of evidence-based clinical dentistry. Modern clinical management should be based on solid scientific evidence gathered about diagnostic procedures and the properties and efficacy of the chosen intervention (e.g. material science, biological, toxicological, pharmacological or psychological aspects). The content of the journal also reflects documentation of the possible side-effects of rehabilitation, and includes prognostic perspectives of the treatment modalities chosen.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书