{"title":"Development of an homologous recombination deficiency scoring algorithm for unmatched ovarian tumor sample based on next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Zhizhong Wang, XinXin Yang, Taoran Cheng, Junnan Feng, Jinxiang Zheng, Tingjie Wang, Mingye Zhang, Hongxue Meng, Cai Jiang, Bing Wei","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a novel targeted therapy, necessitating the development of PARPi sensitivity tests for clinical application. However, the requirement for matched normal tissue complicates clinical testing procedures and increases the burden on patients. In this study, we optimized a bioinformatics algorithm utilizing the Panel of Normals to accommodate tumor-only scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired samples from both clinical (Chinese population) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases (Caucasian population) were employed to establish training cohorts. The tumor-only algorithm was developed based on these cohorts. The performance of the tumor-only algorithm was evaluated through linear regression against the paired sample algorithm. The validity of both algorithms was tested using progression-free survival data from patients treated with PARPis. Additionally, clinical samples from an independent institution were utilized to further validate the tumor-only algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training sets, we observed high correlations between the tumor-only and paired sample algorithms regarding tumoral purity and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, with most R² values exceeding 0.9. In the validation set, a slight decrease in correlation was noted, although the majority of R² values remained close to 0.9. Both algorithms effectively distinguished PARPi-sensitive patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the training and validation cohorts concerning clinical characteristics. Cross-racial validation yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tumor-only algorithm demonstrated an equivalent capacity to the paired sample algorithm for classifying HRD status in ovarian cancer. This algorithm also showed cross-racial applicability, highlighting its potential for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e97","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a novel targeted therapy, necessitating the development of PARPi sensitivity tests for clinical application. However, the requirement for matched normal tissue complicates clinical testing procedures and increases the burden on patients. In this study, we optimized a bioinformatics algorithm utilizing the Panel of Normals to accommodate tumor-only scenarios.
Methods: Paired samples from both clinical (Chinese population) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases (Caucasian population) were employed to establish training cohorts. The tumor-only algorithm was developed based on these cohorts. The performance of the tumor-only algorithm was evaluated through linear regression against the paired sample algorithm. The validity of both algorithms was tested using progression-free survival data from patients treated with PARPis. Additionally, clinical samples from an independent institution were utilized to further validate the tumor-only algorithm.
Results: In the training sets, we observed high correlations between the tumor-only and paired sample algorithms regarding tumoral purity and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, with most R² values exceeding 0.9. In the validation set, a slight decrease in correlation was noted, although the majority of R² values remained close to 0.9. Both algorithms effectively distinguished PARPi-sensitive patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the training and validation cohorts concerning clinical characteristics. Cross-racial validation yielded similar results.
Conclusion: The tumor-only algorithm demonstrated an equivalent capacity to the paired sample algorithm for classifying HRD status in ovarian cancer. This algorithm also showed cross-racial applicability, highlighting its potential for clinical use.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.