Development of an homologous recombination deficiency scoring algorithm for unmatched ovarian tumor sample based on next-generation sequencing.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology Pub Date : 2026-09-01 Epub Date: 2026-03-31 DOI:10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e97
Zhizhong Wang, XinXin Yang, Taoran Cheng, Junnan Feng, Jinxiang Zheng, Tingjie Wang, Mingye Zhang, Hongxue Meng, Cai Jiang, Bing Wei
{"title":"Development of an homologous recombination deficiency scoring algorithm for unmatched ovarian tumor sample based on next-generation sequencing.","authors":"Zhizhong Wang, XinXin Yang, Taoran Cheng, Junnan Feng, Jinxiang Zheng, Tingjie Wang, Mingye Zhang, Hongxue Meng, Cai Jiang, Bing Wei","doi":"10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e97","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a novel targeted therapy, necessitating the development of PARPi sensitivity tests for clinical application. However, the requirement for matched normal tissue complicates clinical testing procedures and increases the burden on patients. In this study, we optimized a bioinformatics algorithm utilizing the Panel of Normals to accommodate tumor-only scenarios.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Paired samples from both clinical (Chinese population) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases (Caucasian population) were employed to establish training cohorts. The tumor-only algorithm was developed based on these cohorts. The performance of the tumor-only algorithm was evaluated through linear regression against the paired sample algorithm. The validity of both algorithms was tested using progression-free survival data from patients treated with PARPis. Additionally, clinical samples from an independent institution were utilized to further validate the tumor-only algorithm.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In the training sets, we observed high correlations between the tumor-only and paired sample algorithms regarding tumoral purity and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, with most R² values exceeding 0.9. In the validation set, a slight decrease in correlation was noted, although the majority of R² values remained close to 0.9. Both algorithms effectively distinguished PARPi-sensitive patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the training and validation cohorts concerning clinical characteristics. Cross-racial validation yielded similar results.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The tumor-only algorithm demonstrated an equivalent capacity to the paired sample algorithm for classifying HRD status in ovarian cancer. This algorithm also showed cross-racial applicability, highlighting its potential for clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":15868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"e97"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13655337/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Gynecologic Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3802/jgo.2026.37.e97","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPis) have emerged as a novel targeted therapy, necessitating the development of PARPi sensitivity tests for clinical application. However, the requirement for matched normal tissue complicates clinical testing procedures and increases the burden on patients. In this study, we optimized a bioinformatics algorithm utilizing the Panel of Normals to accommodate tumor-only scenarios.

Methods: Paired samples from both clinical (Chinese population) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) databases (Caucasian population) were employed to establish training cohorts. The tumor-only algorithm was developed based on these cohorts. The performance of the tumor-only algorithm was evaluated through linear regression against the paired sample algorithm. The validity of both algorithms was tested using progression-free survival data from patients treated with PARPis. Additionally, clinical samples from an independent institution were utilized to further validate the tumor-only algorithm.

Results: In the training sets, we observed high correlations between the tumor-only and paired sample algorithms regarding tumoral purity and homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) scores, with most R² values exceeding 0.9. In the validation set, a slight decrease in correlation was noted, although the majority of R² values remained close to 0.9. Both algorithms effectively distinguished PARPi-sensitive patients. No statistically significant differences were identified between the training and validation cohorts concerning clinical characteristics. Cross-racial validation yielded similar results.

Conclusion: The tumor-only algorithm demonstrated an equivalent capacity to the paired sample algorithm for classifying HRD status in ovarian cancer. This algorithm also showed cross-racial applicability, highlighting its potential for clinical use.

基于下一代测序的不匹配卵巢肿瘤样本同源重组缺陷评分算法的开发。
目的:聚(adp -核糖)聚合酶抑制剂(PARPis)已成为一种新的靶向治疗药物,需要开发PARPi敏感性试验用于临床应用。然而,对匹配正常组织的要求使临床检测程序复杂化,增加了患者的负担。在这项研究中,我们利用正常面板优化了一种生物信息学算法,以适应仅肿瘤的情况。方法:采用来自临床(中国人群)和国际癌症基因组联盟(ICGC)数据库(高加索人群)的配对样本建立训练队列。仅肿瘤算法是基于这些队列开发的。通过对配对样本算法的线性回归来评估仅肿瘤算法的性能。使用parpi治疗患者的无进展生存数据来测试这两种算法的有效性。此外,来自独立机构的临床样本被用来进一步验证仅肿瘤的算法。结果:在训练集中,我们观察到肿瘤纯样本算法和配对样本算法在肿瘤纯度和同源重组缺陷(HRD)评分方面具有高度相关性,大多数R²值超过0.9。在验证集中,注意到相关性略有下降,尽管大多数R²值仍然接近0.9。两种算法都能有效区分parpi敏感患者。在临床特征方面,训练组和验证组之间没有统计学上的显著差异。跨种族验证也得到了类似的结果。结论:仅肿瘤算法与配对样本算法在卵巢癌HRD状态分类方面具有同等的能力。该算法还显示出跨种族的适用性,突出了其临床应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology
Journal of Gynecologic Oncology ONCOLOGY-OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Gynecologic Oncology (JGO) is an official publication of the Asian Society of Gynecologic Oncology. Abbreviated title is ''J Gynecol Oncol''. It was launched in 1990. The JGO''s aim is to publish the highest quality manuscripts dedicated to the advancement of care of the patients with gynecologic cancer. It is an international peer-reviewed periodical journal that is published bimonthly (January, March, May, July, September, and November). Supplement numbers are at times published. The journal publishes editorials, original and review articles, correspondence, book review, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书