Feasibility and Acceptability of an eHealth-Based Physical Activity Coaching Intervention During Pulmonary Rehabilitation for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study.

IF 2 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Sofia Flora, Ana Sofia Grave, Sara Pimenta, Fátima Baptista, Chris Burtin, Joana Cruz
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of an eHealth-Based Physical Activity Coaching Intervention During Pulmonary Rehabilitation for People With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Mixed Methods Study.","authors":"Sofia Flora, Ana Sofia Grave, Sara Pimenta, Fátima Baptista, Chris Burtin, Joana Cruz","doi":"10.2196/83783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical inactivity is a modifiable and significant trait in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While traditional exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves symptoms and exercise tolerance, its impact on physical activity (PA) levels remains limited. Digital health (eHealth) interventions may help address this gap.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating an eHealth PA coaching intervention into PR for people with COPD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients enrolled in an outpatient PR program were recruited for a 3-week PA coaching intervention, which used a smart band connected to a mobile patient app and a web application for health care professionals (HCPs). The intervention included PA monitoring (steps per day); weekly goal setting; and app notifications for goal updates, achievement, and motivational messages. Weekly telephone calls supported goal adjustment and identification of PA barriers. The acceptability of the intervention was explored through a patient focus group.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five patients with COPD (mean 67, SD 9 years; n=4, 80% female; mean predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 second of 49%, SD 23%) participated with 100% retention and adherence to the intervention (daily synchronization). No adverse events or PA barriers were identified. One patient reported an app connection issue that was resolved by restarting the app. Patients found the app easy to use and helpful for their PA awareness and remote monitoring by HCPs. Weekly goal adjustments and contact with an HCP were valued. Limitations regarding the app use included a lack of personalization, goal setting restricted to steps, and occasional step miscounts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The intervention was feasible and well accepted. Future studies with a larger sample are needed to assess the impact of the intervention on PA outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":14841,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Formative Research","volume":"10 ","pages":"e83783"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Formative Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/83783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical inactivity is a modifiable and significant trait in people with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). While traditional exercise-based pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) improves symptoms and exercise tolerance, its impact on physical activity (PA) levels remains limited. Digital health (eHealth) interventions may help address this gap.

Objective: This study aimed to assess the feasibility and acceptability of integrating an eHealth PA coaching intervention into PR for people with COPD.

Methods: Patients enrolled in an outpatient PR program were recruited for a 3-week PA coaching intervention, which used a smart band connected to a mobile patient app and a web application for health care professionals (HCPs). The intervention included PA monitoring (steps per day); weekly goal setting; and app notifications for goal updates, achievement, and motivational messages. Weekly telephone calls supported goal adjustment and identification of PA barriers. The acceptability of the intervention was explored through a patient focus group.

Results: Five patients with COPD (mean 67, SD 9 years; n=4, 80% female; mean predicted forced expiratory volume at 1 second of 49%, SD 23%) participated with 100% retention and adherence to the intervention (daily synchronization). No adverse events or PA barriers were identified. One patient reported an app connection issue that was resolved by restarting the app. Patients found the app easy to use and helpful for their PA awareness and remote monitoring by HCPs. Weekly goal adjustments and contact with an HCP were valued. Limitations regarding the app use included a lack of personalization, goal setting restricted to steps, and occasional step miscounts.

Conclusions: The intervention was feasible and well accepted. Future studies with a larger sample are needed to assess the impact of the intervention on PA outcomes.

慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者肺康复过程中基于电子健康的体育活动指导干预的可行性和可接受性:混合方法研究
背景:缺乏身体活动是慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者可改变的重要特征。虽然传统的基于运动的肺康复(PR)可以改善症状和运动耐受性,但其对身体活动(PA)水平的影响仍然有限。数字卫生(电子卫生)干预措施可能有助于解决这一差距。目的:本研究旨在评估将eHealth PA指导干预纳入COPD患者PR的可行性和可接受性。方法:招募参加门诊PR计划的患者进行为期3周的PA指导干预,该干预使用连接到移动患者应用程序和卫生保健专业人员(HCPs) web应用程序的智能手环。干预措施包括PA监测(每天步数);每周目标设定;以及目标更新、成就和激励信息的应用程序通知。每周电话支持目标调整和PA障碍的识别。通过患者焦点小组探讨干预的可接受性。结果:5例COPD患者(平均67例,SD 9年;n=4例,80%为女性;平均预测1秒用力呼气量49%,SD 23%)参与了100%的保留和坚持干预(每日同步)。未发现不良事件或PA障碍。一位患者报告说,通过重新启动应用程序解决了应用程序连接问题。患者发现该应用程序易于使用,有助于他们的PA意识和HCPs的远程监控。每周的目标调整和与HCP的联系是有价值的。这款应用的局限性包括缺乏个性化,目标设定仅限于步数,以及偶尔的步数错误。结论:该干预措施是可行的,被广泛接受。未来需要更大样本的研究来评估干预对PA结果的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JMIR Formative Research
JMIR Formative Research Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
9.10%
发文量
579
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书