Reflected Surgical Lighting Exposure at the Mohs Surgeon's Eye Level: Quantifying Effects of Working Distance, Drape Color, and Lamp Positioning.

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Dermatologic Surgery Pub Date : 2026-10-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-08 DOI:10.1097/DSS.0000000000005112
Benjamin R Cooper, Stefano Cena, Taha Rasul, Travis W Blalock, Arianne E Chavez
{"title":"Reflected Surgical Lighting Exposure at the Mohs Surgeon's Eye Level: Quantifying Effects of Working Distance, Drape Color, and Lamp Positioning.","authors":"Benjamin R Cooper, Stefano Cena, Taha Rasul, Travis W Blalock, Arianne E Chavez","doi":"10.1097/DSS.0000000000005112","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mohs surgeons operate at close working distances under intense surgical illumination. Ocular symptoms, including eye strain and visual fatigue, are commonly reported, yet quantitative data on eye-level exposure to reflected surgical lighting are limited.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To quantify reflected surgical lighting at the Mohs surgeon's eye position and identify modifiable operative factors influencing ocular exposure.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This observational, device-based experimental study was conducted in a Mohs surgical suite using a simulated surgical model. Reflected illuminance was measured with a calibrated digital lux meter positioned at the surgeon's eye level. Overhead light-emitting diode lighting was fixed 40 inches from the surgical field. Measurements were obtained at eye-to-field distances of 14, 20, and 26 inches across 2 lamp orientations, 2 drape colors, and 3 simulated skin tone categories.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Reflected illuminance was highest at shorter working distances, measuring approximately 1.5 to 2.0 times higher at 14 inches than at 20 inches and up to 2 to 3 times higher than at 26 inches. White drapes increased reflected illuminance compared with blue drapes, while behind-the-surgeon lamp positioning reduced exposure compared with perpendicular lamp positioning. Skin tone had minimal impact.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Modifiable operative factors significantly influence ocular light exposure and represent low-cost strategies to reduce exposure without compromising visualization.</p>","PeriodicalId":11289,"journal":{"name":"Dermatologic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":"949-953"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dermatologic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DSS.0000000000005112","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mohs surgeons operate at close working distances under intense surgical illumination. Ocular symptoms, including eye strain and visual fatigue, are commonly reported, yet quantitative data on eye-level exposure to reflected surgical lighting are limited.

Objective: To quantify reflected surgical lighting at the Mohs surgeon's eye position and identify modifiable operative factors influencing ocular exposure.

Materials and methods: This observational, device-based experimental study was conducted in a Mohs surgical suite using a simulated surgical model. Reflected illuminance was measured with a calibrated digital lux meter positioned at the surgeon's eye level. Overhead light-emitting diode lighting was fixed 40 inches from the surgical field. Measurements were obtained at eye-to-field distances of 14, 20, and 26 inches across 2 lamp orientations, 2 drape colors, and 3 simulated skin tone categories.

Results: Reflected illuminance was highest at shorter working distances, measuring approximately 1.5 to 2.0 times higher at 14 inches than at 20 inches and up to 2 to 3 times higher than at 26 inches. White drapes increased reflected illuminance compared with blue drapes, while behind-the-surgeon lamp positioning reduced exposure compared with perpendicular lamp positioning. Skin tone had minimal impact.

Conclusion: Modifiable operative factors significantly influence ocular light exposure and represent low-cost strategies to reduce exposure without compromising visualization.

莫氏外科医生眼水平反射手术照明暴露:工作距离、窗帘颜色和灯位置的量化影响。
背景:莫氏外科医生在高强度手术照明下进行近距离手术。眼部症状,包括眼疲劳和视疲劳,是常见的报道,但眼睛水平暴露于反射手术照明的定量数据是有限的。目的:量化Mohs外科医生眼位反射的手术光照,并确定影响眼暴露的可改变的手术因素。材料和方法:这项观察性的、基于器械的实验研究是在莫氏手术套件中使用模拟手术模型进行的。反射照度测量用校准过的数字勒克斯计定位在外科医生的眼睛水平。头顶的发光二极管照明固定在离手术野40英寸的地方。测量结果在两种灯方向、两种窗帘颜色和三种模拟肤色类别上的眼距分别为14,20和26英寸。结果:在较短的工作距离处,反射照度最高,在14英寸处比在20英寸处高约1.5至2.0倍,比在26英寸处高2至3倍。与蓝色窗帘相比,白色窗帘增加了反射照度,而手术后放置的灯与垂直放置的灯相比,减少了暴露。肤色的影响最小。结论:可改变的手术因素显著影响眼光暴露,是一种低成本的策略,可以在不影响视觉的情况下减少暴露。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Dermatologic Surgery
Dermatologic Surgery 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
547
期刊介绍: Exclusively devoted to dermatologic surgery, the Dermatologic Surgery journal publishes the most clinically comprehensive and up-to-date information in its field. This unique monthly journal provides today’s most expansive and in-depth coverage of cosmetic and reconstructive skin surgery and skin cancer through peer-reviewed original articles, extensive illustrations, case reports, ongoing features, literature reviews and correspondence. The journal provides information on the latest scientific information for all types of dermatologic surgery including: -Ambulatory phlebectomy- Blepharoplasty- Body contouring- Chemical peels- Cryosurgery- Curettage and desiccation- Dermabrasion- Excision and closure- Flap Surgery- Grafting- Hair restoration surgery- Injectable neuromodulators- Laser surgery- Liposuction- Microdermabrasion- Microlipoinjection- Micropigmentation- Mohs micrographic surgery- Nail surgery- Phlebology- Sclerotherapy- Skin cancer surgery- Skin resurfacing- Soft-tissue fillers. Dermatologists, dermatologic surgeons, plastic surgeons, oculoplastic surgeons and facial plastic surgeons consider this a must-read publication for anyone in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书