Behavioral pharmacology study to inform the switching potential and abuse liability of tobacco-flavored and menthol-flavored pod-based electronic nicotine delivery systems with 5% nicotine concentration.

IF 1.6 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Nicholas I Goldenson, Saul Shiffman, Mark A Sembower, Ryan A Black
{"title":"Behavioral pharmacology study to inform the switching potential and abuse liability of tobacco-flavored and menthol-flavored pod-based electronic nicotine delivery systems with 5% nicotine concentration.","authors":"Nicholas I Goldenson, Saul Shiffman, Mark A Sembower, Ryan A Black","doi":"10.1037/pha0000848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To benefit public health, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) must be sufficiently satisfying to adults who smoke to promote switching away from cigarettes while presenting limited risk of persistent use and dependence among nonusers of tobacco products. This behavioral pharmacology study evaluated the abuse liability and switching potential of four pod-based ENDS (tobacco and menthol flavors) relative to cigarettes. U.S. adults who smoked cigarettes daily (N = 78; 51.3% female; Mage[SD] = 42.91 [9.84]; 53.8% non-Hispanic White; mean cigarettes/day [SD] = 14.42 [11.96]) completed a randomized five-arm crossover behavioral pharmacology study. On 5 separate days, participants used one of four pod-based ENDS, all with 5.0% nicotine concentrations (JUUL2 Virginia Tobacco, NJOY Ace Classic Tobacco, JUUL2 Fresh Menthol, JUUL Menthol 5.0%), or smoked their usual brand cigarette for 20 min ad libitum. After using each product, questionnaires assessed subjective reinforcing and sensory effects relevant to abuse liability and potential for switching away from cigarettes. All ENDS products were rated statistically significantly and meaningfully lower than usual brand cigarette on subjective reinforcing effects (ps < .001; Cohen's ds = 0.58-1.73). The tobacco- and menthol-flavored ENDS were generally rated similarly on measures of subjective reinforcing and sensory effects, but JUUL2 Fresh Menthol 5% was rated significantly higher than the other ENDS on the modified Product Evaluation Scale satisfaction subscale (ps ≤ .01; Cohen's ds = 0.38-0.59). The abuse liability of all tobacco- and menthol-flavored pod-based ENDS in this study is likely substantially lower than cigarettes. The results regarding subjective satisfaction suggest that the switching potential of JUUL2 Fresh Menthol 5% may be higher than tobacco-flavored ENDS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":12089,"journal":{"name":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","volume":"34 2","pages":"153-162"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental and clinical psychopharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/pha0000848","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To benefit public health, electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) must be sufficiently satisfying to adults who smoke to promote switching away from cigarettes while presenting limited risk of persistent use and dependence among nonusers of tobacco products. This behavioral pharmacology study evaluated the abuse liability and switching potential of four pod-based ENDS (tobacco and menthol flavors) relative to cigarettes. U.S. adults who smoked cigarettes daily (N = 78; 51.3% female; Mage[SD] = 42.91 [9.84]; 53.8% non-Hispanic White; mean cigarettes/day [SD] = 14.42 [11.96]) completed a randomized five-arm crossover behavioral pharmacology study. On 5 separate days, participants used one of four pod-based ENDS, all with 5.0% nicotine concentrations (JUUL2 Virginia Tobacco, NJOY Ace Classic Tobacco, JUUL2 Fresh Menthol, JUUL Menthol 5.0%), or smoked their usual brand cigarette for 20 min ad libitum. After using each product, questionnaires assessed subjective reinforcing and sensory effects relevant to abuse liability and potential for switching away from cigarettes. All ENDS products were rated statistically significantly and meaningfully lower than usual brand cigarette on subjective reinforcing effects (ps < .001; Cohen's ds = 0.58-1.73). The tobacco- and menthol-flavored ENDS were generally rated similarly on measures of subjective reinforcing and sensory effects, but JUUL2 Fresh Menthol 5% was rated significantly higher than the other ENDS on the modified Product Evaluation Scale satisfaction subscale (ps ≤ .01; Cohen's ds = 0.38-0.59). The abuse liability of all tobacco- and menthol-flavored pod-based ENDS in this study is likely substantially lower than cigarettes. The results regarding subjective satisfaction suggest that the switching potential of JUUL2 Fresh Menthol 5% may be higher than tobacco-flavored ENDS. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved).

行为药理学研究,了解5%尼古丁浓度的烟草味和薄荷味豆荚电子尼古丁传递系统的转换潜力和滥用风险。
为了使公众健康受益,电子尼古丁传输系统(ENDS)必须能够充分满足吸烟的成年人,促进他们戒烟,同时对非烟草制品使用者持续使用和依赖的风险有限。这项行为药理学研究评估了四种基于豆荚的ENDS(烟草和薄荷香精)相对于香烟的滥用风险和转换潜力。每天吸烟的美国成年人(N = 78, 51.3%为女性,白人[SD] = 42.91[9.84],非西班牙裔白人[SD] = 53.8%,平均每天吸烟[SD] = 14.42[11.96])完成了一项随机五组交叉行为药理学研究。在5个不同的日子里,参与者使用四种尼古丁浓度均为5.0%的豆荚ENDS中的一种(JUUL2弗吉尼亚烟草,NJOY Ace经典烟草,JUUL2新鲜薄荷醇,JUUL薄荷醇5.0%),或者随意抽他们常用品牌的香烟20分钟。在使用每种产品后,调查问卷评估了与滥用责任和戒烟可能性相关的主观强化和感官效应。所有ENDS产品在主观强化效应上的评分均显著低于普通品牌香烟(ps < 0.001; Cohen’s ds = 0.58-1.73)。烟草味和薄荷味ENDS在主观强化和感官效果方面的评分大致相似,但JUUL2 Fresh Menthol 5%在改进的产品评价量表满意度子量表上的评分显著高于其他ENDS (ps≤0.01;Cohen's ds = 0.38-0.59)。在这项研究中,所有以烟草和薄荷味豆荚为基础的ENDS的滥用责任可能大大低于香烟。主观满意度方面的结果表明,JUUL2鲜薄荷醇5%的转换潜力可能高于烟草味ENDS。(PsycInfo数据库记录(c) 2026 APA,版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
164
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology publishes advances in translational and interdisciplinary research on psychopharmacology, broadly defined, and/or substance abuse.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书