{"title":"Synergistic Combinations for Improved Therapeutic Outcomes in Triple Negative Breast Cancer.","authors":"Avani Jha, Shashi Kumar Sampangin Venkatesh, Anuradha Singh, Naga Rajiv Lakkaniga","doi":"10.1002/cbin.70157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically aggressive and clinically challenging subtype of breast cancer, defined by the absence of hormone receptors and HER2 amplification. This limits the applicability of targeted therapies and contributes to poor prognosis. Emerging evidence underscores the therapeutic importance of rationally designed combination regimens capable of generating synergy by simultaneously engaging complementary oncogenic vulnerabilities. Synergistic combinations, such as dual blockade of PI3K/AKT and MAPK signalling, co-inhibition of DNA repair pathways (PARP with ATR or WEE1), and the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, angiogenesis blockade, or epigenetic modifiers, enhance tumour control by disrupting adaptive resistance, promoting immunogenic cell death and remodelling the tumour microenvironment. These strategies exploit synthetic lethality and reverse immune exclusion, often yielding effects greater than the sum of individual agents. Increasing clinical evidence suggests that synergy-based therapeutic design may improve outcomes in TNBC by converting transient responses into durable remissions. Herein, we review the mechanistic insights and translational data that support synergy-driven polytherapy as a foundational paradigm in the evolving management of TNBC.</p>","PeriodicalId":9806,"journal":{"name":"Cell Biology International","volume":"50 4","pages":"e70157"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cell Biology International","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cbin.70157","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a biologically aggressive and clinically challenging subtype of breast cancer, defined by the absence of hormone receptors and HER2 amplification. This limits the applicability of targeted therapies and contributes to poor prognosis. Emerging evidence underscores the therapeutic importance of rationally designed combination regimens capable of generating synergy by simultaneously engaging complementary oncogenic vulnerabilities. Synergistic combinations, such as dual blockade of PI3K/AKT and MAPK signalling, co-inhibition of DNA repair pathways (PARP with ATR or WEE1), and the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy, angiogenesis blockade, or epigenetic modifiers, enhance tumour control by disrupting adaptive resistance, promoting immunogenic cell death and remodelling the tumour microenvironment. These strategies exploit synthetic lethality and reverse immune exclusion, often yielding effects greater than the sum of individual agents. Increasing clinical evidence suggests that synergy-based therapeutic design may improve outcomes in TNBC by converting transient responses into durable remissions. Herein, we review the mechanistic insights and translational data that support synergy-driven polytherapy as a foundational paradigm in the evolving management of TNBC.
期刊介绍:
Each month, the journal publishes easy-to-assimilate, up-to-the minute reports of experimental findings by researchers using a wide range of the latest techniques. Promoting the aims of cell biologists worldwide, papers reporting on structure and function - especially where they relate to the physiology of the whole cell - are strongly encouraged. Molecular biology is welcome, as long as articles report findings that are seen in the wider context of cell biology. In covering all areas of the cell, the journal is both appealing and accessible to a broad audience. Authors whose papers do not appeal to cell biologists in general because their topic is too specialized (e.g. infectious microbes, protozoology) are recommended to send them to more relevant journals. Papers reporting whole animal studies or work more suited to a medical journal, e.g. histopathological studies or clinical immunology, are unlikely to be accepted, unless they are fully focused on some important cellular aspect.
These last remarks extend particularly to papers on cancer. Unless firmly based on some deeper cellular or molecular biological principle, papers that are highly specialized in this field, with limited appeal to cell biologists at large, should be directed towards journals devoted to cancer, there being very many from which to choose.