Long-term variability of impulse oscillometry defined small airway dysfunction in participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Lifei Lu, Gaoying Tang, Qi Wan, Fan Wu, Zhishan Deng, Jieqi Peng, Cuiqiong Dai, Kunning Zhou, Xiaohui Wu, Si Li, Guannan Cai, Suyin Huang, Junfeng Lin, Shuqing Yu, Yongqing Huang, Changli Yang, Shengtang Chen, Pixin Ran, Yumin Zhou
{"title":"Long-term variability of impulse oscillometry defined small airway dysfunction in participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.","authors":"Lifei Lu, Gaoying Tang, Qi Wan, Fan Wu, Zhishan Deng, Jieqi Peng, Cuiqiong Dai, Kunning Zhou, Xiaohui Wu, Si Li, Guannan Cai, Suyin Huang, Junfeng Lin, Shuqing Yu, Yongqing Huang, Changli Yang, Shengtang Chen, Pixin Ran, Yumin Zhou","doi":"10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003918","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Small airway dysfunction (SAD), as assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) (IOS-SAD), exhibits temporal variability and its long-term fluctuations may be linked to distinct clinical phenotypes. We investigated the associations of long-term variability in IOS-SAD with adverse clinical outcomes among participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The baseline and 2-year follow-up data from the early COPD cohort were retrospectively analysed. SAD was defined based on the following criteria: difference from R5 to R20 (R5-R20) >upper limit of normal (ULN) (R5-R20-SAD), or reactance at 5 Hz (X5) <lower limits of normal, or area under the reactance curve (AX) >ULN. Individuals were classified into three groups based on SAD variability over three visits at 2-year follow-up: (1) consistent SAD (SAD at every visit), (2) inconsistent SAD (SAD at some, but not all, visits) and (3) never SAD (no SAD at any visit). Differences in the rate of spirometric lung function decline and exacerbation rate were compared across long-term IOS-SAD variability groups in participants with and without COPD.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In individuals with COPD, the consistent and inconsistent SAD groups assessed were associated with a faster spirometric lung function decline and a higher risk of exacerbations. In individuals without COPD, the consistent R5-R20-SAD group was associated with a faster decline in spirometric lung function and progression towards COPD.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>SAD, even diagnosed once, characterises an airway behaviour with a higher proportion of higher risk of moderate or severe exacerbations. Consistent SAD was associated with accelerated spirometric lung function decline, increased exacerbation risk and progression to spirometry-defined COPD.</p><p><strong>Trial registration number: </strong>ChiCTR1900024643.</p>","PeriodicalId":9048,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13110685/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Respiratory Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjresp-2025-003918","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Small airway dysfunction (SAD), as assessed by impulse oscillometry (IOS) (IOS-SAD), exhibits temporal variability and its long-term fluctuations may be linked to distinct clinical phenotypes. We investigated the associations of long-term variability in IOS-SAD with adverse clinical outcomes among participants with and without chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).

Methods: The baseline and 2-year follow-up data from the early COPD cohort were retrospectively analysed. SAD was defined based on the following criteria: difference from R5 to R20 (R5-R20) >upper limit of normal (ULN) (R5-R20-SAD), or reactance at 5 Hz (X5) ULN. Individuals were classified into three groups based on SAD variability over three visits at 2-year follow-up: (1) consistent SAD (SAD at every visit), (2) inconsistent SAD (SAD at some, but not all, visits) and (3) never SAD (no SAD at any visit). Differences in the rate of spirometric lung function decline and exacerbation rate were compared across long-term IOS-SAD variability groups in participants with and without COPD.

Results: In individuals with COPD, the consistent and inconsistent SAD groups assessed were associated with a faster spirometric lung function decline and a higher risk of exacerbations. In individuals without COPD, the consistent R5-R20-SAD group was associated with a faster decline in spirometric lung function and progression towards COPD.

Conclusions: SAD, even diagnosed once, characterises an airway behaviour with a higher proportion of higher risk of moderate or severe exacerbations. Consistent SAD was associated with accelerated spirometric lung function decline, increased exacerbation risk and progression to spirometry-defined COPD.

Trial registration number: ChiCTR1900024643.

脉冲振荡测量的长期变异性定义了患有和不患有慢性阻塞性肺疾病的参与者的小气道功能障碍。
背景:小气道功能障碍(SAD),通过脉冲振荡测定法(IOS-SAD)评估,表现出时间变异性,其长期波动可能与不同的临床表型有关。我们研究了在有和没有慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)的参与者中,IOS-SAD的长期变异性与不良临床结果的关系。方法:回顾性分析早期COPD队列的基线和2年随访数据。SAD的定义基于以下标准:R5与R20的差值(R5-R20), >正常(ULN)上限(R5-R20-SAD),或5hz (X5) ULN的电抗。在2年的随访中,根据三次访视的SAD变异性,将个体分为三组:(1)一致性SAD(每次访视都有SAD),(2)不一致性SAD(部分但不是全部访视都有SAD)和(3)从不SAD(每次访视都没有SAD)。比较慢性阻塞性肺病患者和非慢性阻塞性肺病患者长期IOS-SAD变异性组肺功能下降率和加重率的差异。结果:在COPD患者中,评估的一致和不一致SAD组与更快的肺功能下降和更高的恶化风险相关。在没有COPD的个体中,一致的R5-R20-SAD组与肺功能快速下降和COPD进展相关。结论:SAD,即使诊断一次,其特征是气道行为具有较高比例的中度或重度恶化的高风险。持续的SAD与肺活量测定肺功能衰退加速、加重风险增加和进展为肺活量测定定义的COPD相关。试验注册号:ChiCTR1900024643。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
BMJ Open Respiratory Research RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
95
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Respiratory Research is a peer-reviewed, open access journal publishing respiratory and critical care medicine. It is the sister journal to Thorax and co-owned by the British Thoracic Society and BMJ. The journal focuses on robustness of methodology and scientific rigour with less emphasis on novelty or perceived impact. BMJ Open Respiratory Research operates a rapid review process, with continuous publication online, ensuring timely, up-to-date research is available worldwide. The journal publishes review articles and all research study types: Basic science including laboratory based experiments and animal models, Pilot studies or proof of concept, Observational studies, Study protocols, Registries, Clinical trials from phase I to multicentre randomised clinical trials, Systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书