A Comparative Immunological Assessment of the Capsules From Silicone Implants With 0-µm and 4-µm Surfaces.

IF 3 2区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
Nathan R Chan, Taylor M Levee, Sally M Winkler, Ronika S Leang, Allen Gabriel
{"title":"A Comparative Immunological Assessment of the Capsules From Silicone Implants With 0-µm and 4-µm Surfaces.","authors":"Nathan R Chan, Taylor M Levee, Sally M Winkler, Ronika S Leang, Allen Gabriel","doi":"10.1093/asj/sjag072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The immune system drives the foreign body response (FBR) to breast implants, triggering cellular and molecular events that lead to the formation of an implant capsule. Implant surface topography may influence this immunological process.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Assess the immune response to silicone implants with smooth or 4-μm surface roughness.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Custom-made, miniaturized implants or coupons of commercially available breast implant shells with smooth (0-μm) or 4-μm surfaces were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsolumbar region of mice. Capsule samples were harvested after 3, 6, or 9 weeks. Immune cells were characterized via histology scoring based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993-6:2016 guidelines (biological evaluation of medical devices), flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Histological total sum scores, indicating overall inflammation, were similar between smooth and 4-µm implants at 3, 6, and 9 weeks postimplantation. Macrophages, key regulators of the FBR, were comparable between smooth and 4-µm implants, as demonstrated by flow cytometry analysis and CD11b+ histology staining. Further analysis of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory macrophages showed similar phenotypes between smooth and 4-µm implants. Regulatory T cell populations, which are responsible for suppressing excessive immune responses and maintaining immune balance, were similar in capsule tissues from smooth and 4-µm implants, as determined by flow cytometry and Foxp3 gene expression analysis. Gene expression of markers for cell populations and mechanotransduction were comparable at all timepoints.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Host immune responses were similar for breast implants with surface roughness of 0 µm or 4 µm up to 9 weeks postimplantation in mice.</p>","PeriodicalId":7728,"journal":{"name":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aesthetic Surgery Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/asj/sjag072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The immune system drives the foreign body response (FBR) to breast implants, triggering cellular and molecular events that lead to the formation of an implant capsule. Implant surface topography may influence this immunological process.

Objectives: Assess the immune response to silicone implants with smooth or 4-μm surface roughness.

Methods: Custom-made, miniaturized implants or coupons of commercially available breast implant shells with smooth (0-μm) or 4-μm surfaces were implanted subcutaneously in the dorsolumbar region of mice. Capsule samples were harvested after 3, 6, or 9 weeks. Immune cells were characterized via histology scoring based on the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 10993-6:2016 guidelines (biological evaluation of medical devices), flow cytometry, immunohistochemistry, and gene expression analysis.

Results: Histological total sum scores, indicating overall inflammation, were similar between smooth and 4-µm implants at 3, 6, and 9 weeks postimplantation. Macrophages, key regulators of the FBR, were comparable between smooth and 4-µm implants, as demonstrated by flow cytometry analysis and CD11b+ histology staining. Further analysis of proinflammatory and anti-inflammatory macrophages showed similar phenotypes between smooth and 4-µm implants. Regulatory T cell populations, which are responsible for suppressing excessive immune responses and maintaining immune balance, were similar in capsule tissues from smooth and 4-µm implants, as determined by flow cytometry and Foxp3 gene expression analysis. Gene expression of markers for cell populations and mechanotransduction were comparable at all timepoints.

Conclusions: Host immune responses were similar for breast implants with surface roughness of 0 µm or 4 µm up to 9 weeks postimplantation in mice.

表面为0µm和4µm的硅胶植入物胶囊的免疫学比较。
背景:免疫系统驱动对乳房植入物的异物反应(FBR),触发细胞和分子事件导致植入物胶囊的形成。种植体表面形貌可能影响这一免疫过程。目的:评估对光滑或4 μm表面粗糙度的硅胶植入物的免疫反应。方法:将定制的、小型化的或市售的表面光滑(0 μm)或4 μm的乳房假体壳片皮下植入小鼠腰背区。胶囊样品在3周、6周或9周后收获。根据国际标准化组织(ISO) 10993-6:2016指南(医疗器械生物学评价)、流式细胞术、免疫组织化学和基因表达分析,通过组织学评分对免疫细胞进行表征。结果:在植入后3周、6周和9周,光滑种植体和4µm种植体的组织学总评分相似,表明总体炎症。流式细胞术分析和CD11b+组织学染色表明,平滑和4µm植入物的巨噬细胞是FBR的关键调节因子。进一步分析促炎和抗炎巨噬细胞在光滑和4µm植入物之间的表型相似。通过流式细胞术和Foxp3基因表达分析发现,负责抑制过度免疫反应和维持免疫平衡的调节性T细胞群在光滑和4µm植入物的胶囊组织中相似。细胞群体和机械转导标记物的基因表达在所有时间点都具有可比性。结论:在植入9周后,表面粗糙度为0µm或4µm的乳房植入物对小鼠的宿主免疫反应相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
20.70%
发文量
309
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Aesthetic Surgery Journal is a peer-reviewed international journal focusing on scientific developments and clinical techniques in aesthetic surgery. The official publication of The Aesthetic Society, ASJ is also the official English-language journal of many major international societies of plastic, aesthetic and reconstructive surgery representing South America, Central America, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. It is also the official journal of the British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons, the Canadian Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery and The Rhinoplasty Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书