{"title":"Planning in the Brain: It's Not What You Think It Is.","authors":"Marcelo G Mattar, Nathaniel D Daw","doi":"10.1146/annurev-neuro-102124-015847","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The neuroscience of planning has long been analogized to search algorithms in artificial intelligence (AI), which simulate future actions to guide immediate choices. We argue that advances in both neuroscience and AI suggest that planning is better understood to encompass a broader class of computations where mental simulation supports learning, often well before a decision is needed. We review three neurocomputational mechanisms that illustrate this shift. First, hippocampal replay resembles search but also often occurs prospectively or offline, likely training downstream circuits rather than directly guiding choice. Second, temporally abstract representations, such as grid cells, can enable planning without iterative search. Third, metalearning may shape how prefrontal dynamics implement task-specific planning strategies, echoing how AI systems learn to adapt across contexts. This view recasts the brain's planning machinery as a family of learning processes that leverage simulations to build representations and strategies, with forward search as one special case.</p>","PeriodicalId":8008,"journal":{"name":"Annual review of neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual review of neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-neuro-102124-015847","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The neuroscience of planning has long been analogized to search algorithms in artificial intelligence (AI), which simulate future actions to guide immediate choices. We argue that advances in both neuroscience and AI suggest that planning is better understood to encompass a broader class of computations where mental simulation supports learning, often well before a decision is needed. We review three neurocomputational mechanisms that illustrate this shift. First, hippocampal replay resembles search but also often occurs prospectively or offline, likely training downstream circuits rather than directly guiding choice. Second, temporally abstract representations, such as grid cells, can enable planning without iterative search. Third, metalearning may shape how prefrontal dynamics implement task-specific planning strategies, echoing how AI systems learn to adapt across contexts. This view recasts the brain's planning machinery as a family of learning processes that leverage simulations to build representations and strategies, with forward search as one special case.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Neuroscience is a well-established and comprehensive journal in the field of neuroscience, with a rich history and a commitment to open access and scholarly communication. The journal has been in publication since 1978, providing a long-standing source of authoritative reviews in neuroscience.
The Annual Review of Neuroscience encompasses a wide range of topics within neuroscience, including but not limited to: Molecular and cellular neuroscience, Neurogenetics, Developmental neuroscience, Neural plasticity and repair, Systems neuroscience, Cognitive neuroscience, Behavioral neuroscience, Neurobiology of disease. Occasionally, the journal also features reviews on the history of neuroscience and ethical considerations within the field.