Comparative Efficacy of Ulinastatin and Vitamin C in Burn-associated Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Naveen Kumar, Anshu Singh, Ravi Kumar, Manish Kumar, Ajay Kumar Chaudhary
{"title":"Comparative Efficacy of Ulinastatin and Vitamin C in Burn-associated Sepsis: A Randomized Controlled Trial.","authors":"Naveen Kumar, Anshu Singh, Ravi Kumar, Manish Kumar, Ajay Kumar Chaudhary","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_15_26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients due to inflammatory dysregulation and immune impairment. Adjunctive therapies such as ulinastatin and Vitamin C may attenuate inflammation and improve organ function, but comparative evidence in burn-associated sepsis is limited. This study compared ulinastatin and Vitamin C in burn patients with sepsis, focusing on survival, organ dysfunction, and inflammatory biomarkers.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective, randomized, triple-blind controlled trial was conducted over 1 year in the burn intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care center. Seventy adult patients (≥18 years) with 10%-40% total body surface area thermal burns and sepsis as per Sepsis-3 criteria were randomized to receive either ulinastatin (200,000 IU intravenous [IV]) or Vitamin C (1.5 g IV) for 3 days. Biomarkers (interleukin [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], procalcitonin [PCT], and lactate) and clinical parameters (PaO2/FiO2 [P/F] ratio and ICU stay) were assessed at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both the groups showed clinical and biomarker improvement over time. Ulinastatin resulted in significantly greater reductions in IL-6 and CRP by 72 h and was associated with shorter ICU stays, reduced vasopressor requirement, and improved P/F ratio compared to the Vitamin C group. PCT decreased more significantly in the Vitamin C group over time. Mortality was lower in the ulinastatin group (22.8%) compared to the Vitamin C group (34.3%), although not statistically significant (P = 0.289). No adverse drug-related effects were reported.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both ulinastatin and Vitamin C provided benefit in burn-associated sepsis; however, ulinastatin demonstrated more consistent anti-inflammatory effects and reduced need for intensive supportive measures, supporting its role as an adjunctive therapy.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_15_26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sepsis remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in burn patients due to inflammatory dysregulation and immune impairment. Adjunctive therapies such as ulinastatin and Vitamin C may attenuate inflammation and improve organ function, but comparative evidence in burn-associated sepsis is limited. This study compared ulinastatin and Vitamin C in burn patients with sepsis, focusing on survival, organ dysfunction, and inflammatory biomarkers.

Materials and methods: This prospective, randomized, triple-blind controlled trial was conducted over 1 year in the burn intensive care unit (ICU) of a tertiary care center. Seventy adult patients (≥18 years) with 10%-40% total body surface area thermal burns and sepsis as per Sepsis-3 criteria were randomized to receive either ulinastatin (200,000 IU intravenous [IV]) or Vitamin C (1.5 g IV) for 3 days. Biomarkers (interleukin [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], procalcitonin [PCT], and lactate) and clinical parameters (PaO2/FiO2 [P/F] ratio and ICU stay) were assessed at baseline and at 24, 48, and 72 h.

Results: Both the groups showed clinical and biomarker improvement over time. Ulinastatin resulted in significantly greater reductions in IL-6 and CRP by 72 h and was associated with shorter ICU stays, reduced vasopressor requirement, and improved P/F ratio compared to the Vitamin C group. PCT decreased more significantly in the Vitamin C group over time. Mortality was lower in the ulinastatin group (22.8%) compared to the Vitamin C group (34.3%), although not statistically significant (P = 0.289). No adverse drug-related effects were reported.

Conclusion: Both ulinastatin and Vitamin C provided benefit in burn-associated sepsis; however, ulinastatin demonstrated more consistent anti-inflammatory effects and reduced need for intensive supportive measures, supporting its role as an adjunctive therapy.

乌司他丁和维生素C治疗烧伤相关脓毒症的比较疗效:一项随机对照试验。
导语:脓毒症仍然是烧伤患者发病率和死亡率的主要原因,由于炎症失调和免疫损伤。辅助治疗如乌司他丁和维生素C可能减轻炎症和改善器官功能,但烧伤相关败血症的比较证据有限。本研究比较了乌司他丁和维生素C在脓毒症烧伤患者中的作用,重点关注生存、器官功能障碍和炎症生物标志物。材料和方法:这项前瞻性、随机、三盲对照试验在一家三级医疗中心的烧伤重症监护病房(ICU)进行了1年多的研究。根据脓毒症-3标准,70例体表面积为10%-40%的热烧伤和脓毒症的成年患者(≥18岁)随机接受乌司他丁(200,000 IU静脉注射[IV])或维生素C (1.5 g静脉注射)3天。在基线和24h、48h和72h时评估生物标志物(白细胞介素[IL-6]、c反应蛋白[CRP]、降钙素原[PCT]和乳酸)和临床参数(PaO2/FiO2 [P/F]比值和ICU住院时间)。结果:两组患者的临床和生物标志物均随时间改善。与维生素C组相比,乌司他汀组在72小时内显著降低了IL-6和CRP,缩短了ICU住院时间,降低了血管加压素需求,提高了P/F比。随着时间的推移,维生素C组的PCT下降更为显著。乌司他丁组的死亡率(22.8%)低于维生素C组(34.3%),但无统计学意义(P = 0.289)。没有药物相关不良反应的报道。结论:乌司他丁和维生素C对烧伤相关脓毒症均有疗效;然而,乌司他丁表现出更一致的抗炎作用,减少了对强化支持措施的需求,支持其作为辅助治疗的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书