Effect of Throat Pack Use on Postoperative Sore Throat in Nasal Surgeries: A Prospective Observational Study.

IF 0.7 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Siri Kandavar, N Dinesh Kumar
{"title":"Effect of Throat Pack Use on Postoperative Sore Throat in Nasal Surgeries: A Prospective Observational Study.","authors":"Siri Kandavar, N Dinesh Kumar","doi":"10.4103/aam.aam_838_25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication following general anesthesia in ENT and nasal surgeries, where surgical bleeding into the pharynx is a well-documented concern. Throat packs are used to absorb blood, secretions, and debris to reduce aspiration risk, but mechanical irritation of the delicate pharyngeal mucosa may result in mucosal trauma and postoperative airway discomfort.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The objective of the study is to compare the occurrence and severity of POST in nasal surgeries performed with and without throat pack insertion.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital between April 2024 and May 2025. Seventy-two adult patients (20-60 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, undergoing elective nasal surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (with a throat pack, n = 36) and Group II (without a throat pack, n = 36). POST was assessed at 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using the Harding and McVey scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v29.0, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>POST was observed in both groups; however, its occurrence and severity were significantly higher in the throat pack group. All patients in Group I experienced POST, compared to 94.4% in Group II. Moderate-to-severe sore throat was more common in Group I during the early postoperative period. The duration of surgery showed a significant association with POST (P = 0.047), whereas ASA grade and type of surgery did not demonstrate significant associations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>POST was observed in both the throat pack and the no throat pack groups. Considering the potential risk of blood and saline aspiration during nasal surgeries, the use of a throat pack may be advocated as a protective measure in all nasal procedures. Careful insertion, appropriate sizing, and timely removal of the throat pack are essential to minimize pharyngeal mucosal trauma while ensuring patient safety.</p>","PeriodicalId":7938,"journal":{"name":"Annals of African Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of African Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aam.aam_838_25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Postoperative sore throat (POST) is a common complication following general anesthesia in ENT and nasal surgeries, where surgical bleeding into the pharynx is a well-documented concern. Throat packs are used to absorb blood, secretions, and debris to reduce aspiration risk, but mechanical irritation of the delicate pharyngeal mucosa may result in mucosal trauma and postoperative airway discomfort.

Objectives: The objective of the study is to compare the occurrence and severity of POST in nasal surgeries performed with and without throat pack insertion.

Methodology: This prospective observational study was conducted at a tertiary care hospital between April 2024 and May 2025. Seventy-two adult patients (20-60 years), American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-II, undergoing elective nasal surgeries under general anesthesia with endotracheal intubation, were enrolled. Patients were divided into two groups: Group I (with a throat pack, n = 36) and Group II (without a throat pack, n = 36). POST was assessed at 2, 24, and 48 h postoperatively using the Harding and McVey scoring system. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS v29.0, with P < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results: POST was observed in both groups; however, its occurrence and severity were significantly higher in the throat pack group. All patients in Group I experienced POST, compared to 94.4% in Group II. Moderate-to-severe sore throat was more common in Group I during the early postoperative period. The duration of surgery showed a significant association with POST (P = 0.047), whereas ASA grade and type of surgery did not demonstrate significant associations.

Conclusion: POST was observed in both the throat pack and the no throat pack groups. Considering the potential risk of blood and saline aspiration during nasal surgeries, the use of a throat pack may be advocated as a protective measure in all nasal procedures. Careful insertion, appropriate sizing, and timely removal of the throat pack are essential to minimize pharyngeal mucosal trauma while ensuring patient safety.

鼻部手术后使用咽袋治疗咽痛的效果:一项前瞻性观察研究。
背景:术后喉咙痛(POST)是耳鼻喉科手术全麻后常见的并发症,其中手术出血进入咽部是一个有充分证据的问题。咽喉袋用于吸收血液、分泌物和碎屑,以降低误吸风险,但对脆弱的咽粘膜的机械刺激可能导致粘膜损伤和术后气道不适。目的:本研究的目的是比较在有和没有插入喉袋的鼻部手术中POST的发生率和严重程度。方法:这项前瞻性观察研究于2024年4月至2025年5月在一家三级保健医院进行。入选72例成人患者(20-60岁),美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)身体状态I-II级,在气管插管全麻下行择期鼻手术。患者分为两组:I组(带咽袋,n = 36)和II组(不带咽袋,n = 36)。采用Harding和McVey评分系统于术后2、24和48小时评估POST。采用SPSS v29.0进行统计学分析,以P < 0.05为差异有统计学意义。结果:两组患者均出现POST;然而,其发生率和严重程度明显高于喉包组。第一组患者均出现POST,而第二组为94.4%。术后早期I组中至重度喉咙痛更为常见。手术时间与POST有显著相关性(P = 0.047),而ASA分级和手术类型无显著相关性。结论:喉包组和无喉包组均有POST。考虑到鼻手术过程中吸入血液和生理盐水的潜在风险,在所有鼻手术中都可以提倡使用咽袋作为一种保护措施。小心插入,适当的尺寸,及时取出咽喉袋是必要的,以尽量减少咽粘膜创伤,同时确保患者的安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of African Medicine
Annals of African Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: The Annals of African Medicine is published by the Usmanu Danfodiyo University Teaching Hospital, Sokoto, Nigeria and the Annals of African Medicine Society. The Journal is intended to serve as a medium for the publication of research findings in the broad field of Medicine in Africa and other developing countries, and elsewhere which have relevance to Africa. It will serve as a source of information on the state of the art of Medicine in Africa, for continuing education for doctors in Africa and other developing countries, and also for the publication of meetings and conferences. The journal will publish articles I any field of Medicine and other fields which have relevance or implications for Medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书