ICTs and Rural E-Governance: From Digital Design to Public Policy

IF 6.3 2区 管理学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Information Systems Journal Pub Date : 2026-04-15 Epub Date: 2025-08-08 DOI:10.1111/isj.70012
Ning Su, Fu Jia, Jeff, Shan L. Pan, Carol Hsu
{"title":"ICTs and Rural E-Governance: From Digital Design to Public Policy","authors":"Ning Su,&nbsp;Fu Jia,&nbsp;Jeff,&nbsp;Shan L. Pan,&nbsp;Carol Hsu","doi":"10.1111/isj.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Over the past three decades, information and communication technologies (ICTs) have significantly shaped the emergence and evolution of public organisations and public policies worldwide. The rapid advancement of ICTs has contributed to e-governance, which broadly comprises the use of ICTs for government administration, public services, stakeholder engagement and other activities. According to the United Nations' E-Government Survey in 2024, diverse regions around the world have been increasingly leveraging ICTs to enhance government services, whereas ‘[t]he rapid digitalization of services, the shift towards remote work, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), the emphasis on digital identity and data management, and the increased use of data and emerging technologies for policymaking are key global megatrends’ (United Nations <span>2024</span>, xxi).</p><p>Despite the adoption of ICTs in the public sector and advancement in e-governance, rural communities remain underserved in today's digital age (United Nations <span>2024</span>) and to some extent understudied in the e-governance literature. Today, over 40% of the world's population lives in rural areas (United Nations <span>2018</span>; World Bank <span>2024</span>), including regions with limited resources and insufficient infrastructure, potentially posing significant challenges for public service and socioeconomic development. ICTs present unique value propositions and promises, as well as risks and challenges. The opportunities are especially salient in areas such as the expansion of rural communities' access to digital infrastructure, innovation in agriculture and enhancement of food security, deployment of healthcare applications and services, contribution to gender equality, reduction of inequality including the digital divide, promotion of education and employment, sustainable development and protection of endangered animals (ITU <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Reflecting the multifaceted and complex nature of e-governance, research from multiple fields, including public policy, rural studies, development sociology, development economics and information systems (IS), has explored related topics (e.g., Banerjee et al. <span>2020</span>; Dawes <span>2008</span>; Salemink et al. <span>2017</span>; Slavova and Metiu <span>2022</span>; Xiao et al. <span>2013</span>). Among these fields, IS, with its focus on technology, is potentially uniquely positioned to generate nuanced and valuable insights into the role of ICTs in enabling and improving public services. The findings from the IS literature have demonstrated and detailed how different forms of ICTs, from established technologies, such as mainframes, desktops, the Internet and cellular services, to emerging technologies, such as cloud, mobile applications, Internet of Things, blockchain, metaverse and AI, have increasingly been operating as an occasion for interaction among governments, public-sector organisations, individuals, firms and societal actors (e.g., Brown and Thompson <span>2011</span>; Chua and Storey <span>2022</span>; Dunleavy et al. <span>2006</span>; Engesmo and Panteli <span>2020</span>; Kauffman and Techatassanasoontorn <span>2009</span>; Meijer <span>2015</span>; Oborn et al. <span>2019</span>; Reddick <span>2004</span>; Su <span>2011</span>).</p><p>In the IS literature, a collection of studies has explored ICT-enabled governance and development in the rural context, taking the first step to unpack the potential of ICTs for rural e-governance. For example, first, technology-related initiatives can improve digital adoption and bridge the digital divide in regions, including rural areas, under poverty (Masiero and Das <span>2019</span>; Srivastava and Shainesh <span>2015</span>; Venkatesh and Sykes <span>2013</span>). Second, ICTs can contribute to women's income (Bailur and Masiero <span>2017</span>) and health by increasing access to medical care and reducing mortality (Venkatesh et al. <span>2020</span>). Third, e-commerce has been transforming rural economies, contributing to the formation of rural e-commerce ecosystems (Leong et al. <span>2016</span>), the development of rural community's capabilities (Cui et al. <span>2019</span>), the elimination of poverty (Jha et al. <span>2016</span>; Li et al. <span>2019</span>), as well as social innovation and sustainability (Tim et al. <span>2021</span>).</p><p>Meanwhile, how to design, develop, deploy, leverage and evaluate ICTs for rural e-governance remains a complex question for policymakers and practitioners, and an underexplored yet important research area for academics. In the rest of this article, we first provide a brief overview of the evolution of ICTs in e-governance, based on both academic research and practitioner insights. Drawing on the literature, we also identify several themes which represent both challenges and opportunities in the design and use of ICTs for rural e-governance. Then, we present a framework for conceptualising and envisioning research on ICTs for rural e-governance. Building on this framework, next, we introduce the articles in this special issue and discuss how these studies contribute to the research on rural e-governance in different but complementary ways. Finally, we explore potential opportunities and directions for future research on ICTs and rural e-governance.</p><p>The landscape of e-governance has evolved significantly over the past decades. The evolution spanned multiple areas, including the specific ICTs adopted, the institutional, organisational, cultural and social environments surrounding the technologies, and the socioeconomic conditions in diverse regions around the world in which these technologies have been designed, deployed and adopted. In the following, we focus on tracing the evolution of technologies for e-governance. Table 1 provides a summary of the evolution.</p><p>Since computers and telecommunication technologies started being systematically adopted in the public sector, the specific types of ICTs for e-governance can be broadly categorised into several periods (e.g., Dawes <span>2008</span>): the era of mainframes pre-1990s, the era of personal computers during the 1990s, the era of the Internet and what became known as Web 1.0 in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the era of Web 2.0 post-2000s and the age of diverse potentially disruptive technologies, from blockchain to artificial intelligence.</p><p>E-governance in the rural context, in particular, presents unique challenges and opportunities. Research in the field of rural studies and related disciplines suggests that rural regions have traditionally struggled to adapt to and benefit from, the digital economy (e.g., Malecki <span>2003</span>; Venkatachalam and McDowell <span>2003</span>; Warren <span>2007</span>). In today's digital age, a significant digital divide remains between rural and urban regions, impacting the governance and development of rural regions around the world. Specifically, the design and use of digital technology have been uneven between urban and rural regions and uneven among rural communities worldwide. Such disparities are observed in both developed and developing economies (Roberts et al. <span>2017</span>). A review of the existing research demonstrates several most salient themes which represent both challenges and opportunities in the design and use of ICTs for rural e-governance.</p><p>Existing research and practice have demonstrated the value and potential of ICTs in socioeconomic development, including the development of rural regions (e.g., Díaz Andrade et al. <span>2019</span>; Heeks et al. <span>2021</span>; Nicholson et al. <span>2021</span>). Faced with the ambiguous, multifaceted and interdisciplinary nature (e.g., Rittel and Webber <span>1973</span>; Simon <span>1996</span>) of complex phenomena such as rural e-governance, the increasing advancement and adoption of ICTs can contribute to the designing of innovative solutions (e.g., Brown <span>2009</span>; Manzini <span>2015</span>). Existing research on e-governance in general has shown that strategically planning and designing e-governance initiatives, taking into account diverse elements including technologies, policies and stakeholders, can help achieve the intended benefits while addressing barriers to e-governance initiatives (e.g., Dawes et al. <span>2016</span>; Janssen et al. <span>2020</span>).</p><p>In the field of information systems, designing ICT-based solutions to complex socioeconomic problems has been a prominent theme. A subset of studies in IS and related literatures has addressed the topic of designing solutions for e-governance (e.g., Goldkuhl <span>2016</span>). The design of use of ICTs as solutions has also proven successful in rural regions (e.g., Venkatesh and Sykes <span>2013</span>). To help academics and practitioners conceptualise existing research and envision future work on ICTs for rural e-governance, in the following, we present a research framework. It should be noted that the goal of the framework is not to provide a comprehensive taxonomy of the literature, but to develop a roadmap for research such as different studies can collectively contribute to designing ICT-based solutions for rural e-governance (Figure 1).</p><p>In the following, we introduce the three articles in this special issue. The articles address different aspects of rural e-governance and apply divergent methods, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods and design-based research. We also use these articles to illustrate the conceptual framework presented above (Figure 2).</p><p>The first paper, ‘Challenges in developing information and communication technology (ICT) use for rural e-governance: An ecology perspective’, by Shou et al. (<span>2025</span>), analyses various ICT applications that could enhance e-governance within the different sectors of rural landscapes. The theoretical foundation of the paper is the ecological perspective (e.g., Nardi and O'Day <span>2000</span>) which has been adopted and applied in the IS literature to explore diverse phenomena (e.g., Miranda et al. <span>2022</span>; Wang <span>2021</span>). In the context of rural e-governance, the lens of ecology emphasises the heterogeneity and intricate relationships between different elements within rural digital ecosystems. Based on the ecological perspective, this study adopts a research method which combines a quantitative investigation of the significant but varying impacts of ICT utilisation on rural e-governance, with a qualitative analysis for identifying a diverse set of challenges in rural e-governance and proposing a set of strategies. These strategies can offer guidance for policymakers in addressing the identified challenges and advancing rural e-governance. Overall, this study is positioned in the top right area of the research framework, as it unpacks the interconnected, ICT-based ecosystem in rural regions and develops valuable intervention strategies for policymakers.</p><p>The second paper, ‘Can information and communication technology drive effective spatial governance in rural areas? Emergence of e-participation ecosystem from rural China’ by Tong et al. (<span>2025</span>), focuses on the design and use of ICTs for spatial and territorial governance (Angelidou <span>2014</span>; Dadashpoor and Yousefi <span>2018</span>; Gagliardi et al. <span>2017</span>; Santinha and Anselmo de Castro <span>2010</span>; Sun et al. <span>2021</span>, <span>2024</span>) in the context of rural areas. Specifically, the research reports on the design, implementation and outcome of an ICT-based technique, involving the collaborative efforts of designers, government officials and villagers in rural communities. While the study also demonstrates the value of ICTs in rural e-governance, compared to the other papers in the special issue, this study concentrates on a specific instance of technology and its use case and impact, which places the study in the bottom left area of the research framework.</p><p>The third paper, ‘How do information and communication technology platforms shape rural e-governance: The case of Zhao-lou Village on the WeCounty platform’, by Chen, Cheng, et al. (<span>2025</span>), analyses the impact of a digital platform on policy deployment. Specifically, the study has shown how the platform can shape the tension and interaction between key stakeholders, including local governments and villagers, in the rural context. Using positivist case studies as research strategy (Su <span>2018</span>; Yin <span>2014</span>), The paper's findings offer nuanced insights into the mechanisms by which ICT influences rural e-governance. For example, the study finds that facing the tension between governments and villagers, digital platforms and related activities could enhance interaction between the two stakeholders and ultimately promote a compromise, thereby contributing to effective policy deployment. Overall, this study can be positioned in the middle area of the research framework, as the study seeks to link an individual digital platform to ICT-enabled social processes surrounding the platform, while unpacking the connection between technology and policy.</p><p>In summary, existing research in multiple disciplines has explored the important, complex and dynamic domain of rural e-governance. Globally, as ICTs rapidly advance and the socioeconomic environments in rural regions evolve, new opportunities and challenges arise in these traditionally underserved and understudied communities, presenting unique questions for academics, policymakers and practitioners in both public and private sectors. Among different academic fields, IS could be in a unique position, with the potential to bridge learning from different disciplines and offer important insights into designing ICT-related solutions for rural e-governance. The research framework presented in this paper has highlighted the versatility and diversity of IS research. Based on the framework, we identify several potential avenues for future research.</p><p>This article is based on the existing literature.</p>","PeriodicalId":48049,"journal":{"name":"Information Systems Journal","volume":"36 3","pages":"350-363"},"PeriodicalIF":6.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/isj.70012","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information Systems Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/isj.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past three decades, information and communication technologies (ICTs) have significantly shaped the emergence and evolution of public organisations and public policies worldwide. The rapid advancement of ICTs has contributed to e-governance, which broadly comprises the use of ICTs for government administration, public services, stakeholder engagement and other activities. According to the United Nations' E-Government Survey in 2024, diverse regions around the world have been increasingly leveraging ICTs to enhance government services, whereas ‘[t]he rapid digitalization of services, the shift towards remote work, the integration of artificial intelligence (AI), the emphasis on digital identity and data management, and the increased use of data and emerging technologies for policymaking are key global megatrends’ (United Nations 2024, xxi).

Despite the adoption of ICTs in the public sector and advancement in e-governance, rural communities remain underserved in today's digital age (United Nations 2024) and to some extent understudied in the e-governance literature. Today, over 40% of the world's population lives in rural areas (United Nations 2018; World Bank 2024), including regions with limited resources and insufficient infrastructure, potentially posing significant challenges for public service and socioeconomic development. ICTs present unique value propositions and promises, as well as risks and challenges. The opportunities are especially salient in areas such as the expansion of rural communities' access to digital infrastructure, innovation in agriculture and enhancement of food security, deployment of healthcare applications and services, contribution to gender equality, reduction of inequality including the digital divide, promotion of education and employment, sustainable development and protection of endangered animals (ITU 2021).

Reflecting the multifaceted and complex nature of e-governance, research from multiple fields, including public policy, rural studies, development sociology, development economics and information systems (IS), has explored related topics (e.g., Banerjee et al. 2020; Dawes 2008; Salemink et al. 2017; Slavova and Metiu 2022; Xiao et al. 2013). Among these fields, IS, with its focus on technology, is potentially uniquely positioned to generate nuanced and valuable insights into the role of ICTs in enabling and improving public services. The findings from the IS literature have demonstrated and detailed how different forms of ICTs, from established technologies, such as mainframes, desktops, the Internet and cellular services, to emerging technologies, such as cloud, mobile applications, Internet of Things, blockchain, metaverse and AI, have increasingly been operating as an occasion for interaction among governments, public-sector organisations, individuals, firms and societal actors (e.g., Brown and Thompson 2011; Chua and Storey 2022; Dunleavy et al. 2006; Engesmo and Panteli 2020; Kauffman and Techatassanasoontorn 2009; Meijer 2015; Oborn et al. 2019; Reddick 2004; Su 2011).

In the IS literature, a collection of studies has explored ICT-enabled governance and development in the rural context, taking the first step to unpack the potential of ICTs for rural e-governance. For example, first, technology-related initiatives can improve digital adoption and bridge the digital divide in regions, including rural areas, under poverty (Masiero and Das 2019; Srivastava and Shainesh 2015; Venkatesh and Sykes 2013). Second, ICTs can contribute to women's income (Bailur and Masiero 2017) and health by increasing access to medical care and reducing mortality (Venkatesh et al. 2020). Third, e-commerce has been transforming rural economies, contributing to the formation of rural e-commerce ecosystems (Leong et al. 2016), the development of rural community's capabilities (Cui et al. 2019), the elimination of poverty (Jha et al. 2016; Li et al. 2019), as well as social innovation and sustainability (Tim et al. 2021).

Meanwhile, how to design, develop, deploy, leverage and evaluate ICTs for rural e-governance remains a complex question for policymakers and practitioners, and an underexplored yet important research area for academics. In the rest of this article, we first provide a brief overview of the evolution of ICTs in e-governance, based on both academic research and practitioner insights. Drawing on the literature, we also identify several themes which represent both challenges and opportunities in the design and use of ICTs for rural e-governance. Then, we present a framework for conceptualising and envisioning research on ICTs for rural e-governance. Building on this framework, next, we introduce the articles in this special issue and discuss how these studies contribute to the research on rural e-governance in different but complementary ways. Finally, we explore potential opportunities and directions for future research on ICTs and rural e-governance.

The landscape of e-governance has evolved significantly over the past decades. The evolution spanned multiple areas, including the specific ICTs adopted, the institutional, organisational, cultural and social environments surrounding the technologies, and the socioeconomic conditions in diverse regions around the world in which these technologies have been designed, deployed and adopted. In the following, we focus on tracing the evolution of technologies for e-governance. Table 1 provides a summary of the evolution.

Since computers and telecommunication technologies started being systematically adopted in the public sector, the specific types of ICTs for e-governance can be broadly categorised into several periods (e.g., Dawes 2008): the era of mainframes pre-1990s, the era of personal computers during the 1990s, the era of the Internet and what became known as Web 1.0 in the late 1990s and early 2000s, the era of Web 2.0 post-2000s and the age of diverse potentially disruptive technologies, from blockchain to artificial intelligence.

E-governance in the rural context, in particular, presents unique challenges and opportunities. Research in the field of rural studies and related disciplines suggests that rural regions have traditionally struggled to adapt to and benefit from, the digital economy (e.g., Malecki 2003; Venkatachalam and McDowell 2003; Warren 2007). In today's digital age, a significant digital divide remains between rural and urban regions, impacting the governance and development of rural regions around the world. Specifically, the design and use of digital technology have been uneven between urban and rural regions and uneven among rural communities worldwide. Such disparities are observed in both developed and developing economies (Roberts et al. 2017). A review of the existing research demonstrates several most salient themes which represent both challenges and opportunities in the design and use of ICTs for rural e-governance.

Existing research and practice have demonstrated the value and potential of ICTs in socioeconomic development, including the development of rural regions (e.g., Díaz Andrade et al. 2019; Heeks et al. 2021; Nicholson et al. 2021). Faced with the ambiguous, multifaceted and interdisciplinary nature (e.g., Rittel and Webber 1973; Simon 1996) of complex phenomena such as rural e-governance, the increasing advancement and adoption of ICTs can contribute to the designing of innovative solutions (e.g., Brown 2009; Manzini 2015). Existing research on e-governance in general has shown that strategically planning and designing e-governance initiatives, taking into account diverse elements including technologies, policies and stakeholders, can help achieve the intended benefits while addressing barriers to e-governance initiatives (e.g., Dawes et al. 2016; Janssen et al. 2020).

In the field of information systems, designing ICT-based solutions to complex socioeconomic problems has been a prominent theme. A subset of studies in IS and related literatures has addressed the topic of designing solutions for e-governance (e.g., Goldkuhl 2016). The design of use of ICTs as solutions has also proven successful in rural regions (e.g., Venkatesh and Sykes 2013). To help academics and practitioners conceptualise existing research and envision future work on ICTs for rural e-governance, in the following, we present a research framework. It should be noted that the goal of the framework is not to provide a comprehensive taxonomy of the literature, but to develop a roadmap for research such as different studies can collectively contribute to designing ICT-based solutions for rural e-governance (Figure 1).

In the following, we introduce the three articles in this special issue. The articles address different aspects of rural e-governance and apply divergent methods, including quantitative, qualitative, mixed methods and design-based research. We also use these articles to illustrate the conceptual framework presented above (Figure 2).

The first paper, ‘Challenges in developing information and communication technology (ICT) use for rural e-governance: An ecology perspective’, by Shou et al. (2025), analyses various ICT applications that could enhance e-governance within the different sectors of rural landscapes. The theoretical foundation of the paper is the ecological perspective (e.g., Nardi and O'Day 2000) which has been adopted and applied in the IS literature to explore diverse phenomena (e.g., Miranda et al. 2022; Wang 2021). In the context of rural e-governance, the lens of ecology emphasises the heterogeneity and intricate relationships between different elements within rural digital ecosystems. Based on the ecological perspective, this study adopts a research method which combines a quantitative investigation of the significant but varying impacts of ICT utilisation on rural e-governance, with a qualitative analysis for identifying a diverse set of challenges in rural e-governance and proposing a set of strategies. These strategies can offer guidance for policymakers in addressing the identified challenges and advancing rural e-governance. Overall, this study is positioned in the top right area of the research framework, as it unpacks the interconnected, ICT-based ecosystem in rural regions and develops valuable intervention strategies for policymakers.

The second paper, ‘Can information and communication technology drive effective spatial governance in rural areas? Emergence of e-participation ecosystem from rural China’ by Tong et al. (2025), focuses on the design and use of ICTs for spatial and territorial governance (Angelidou 2014; Dadashpoor and Yousefi 2018; Gagliardi et al. 2017; Santinha and Anselmo de Castro 2010; Sun et al. 2021, 2024) in the context of rural areas. Specifically, the research reports on the design, implementation and outcome of an ICT-based technique, involving the collaborative efforts of designers, government officials and villagers in rural communities. While the study also demonstrates the value of ICTs in rural e-governance, compared to the other papers in the special issue, this study concentrates on a specific instance of technology and its use case and impact, which places the study in the bottom left area of the research framework.

The third paper, ‘How do information and communication technology platforms shape rural e-governance: The case of Zhao-lou Village on the WeCounty platform’, by Chen, Cheng, et al. (2025), analyses the impact of a digital platform on policy deployment. Specifically, the study has shown how the platform can shape the tension and interaction between key stakeholders, including local governments and villagers, in the rural context. Using positivist case studies as research strategy (Su 2018; Yin 2014), The paper's findings offer nuanced insights into the mechanisms by which ICT influences rural e-governance. For example, the study finds that facing the tension between governments and villagers, digital platforms and related activities could enhance interaction between the two stakeholders and ultimately promote a compromise, thereby contributing to effective policy deployment. Overall, this study can be positioned in the middle area of the research framework, as the study seeks to link an individual digital platform to ICT-enabled social processes surrounding the platform, while unpacking the connection between technology and policy.

In summary, existing research in multiple disciplines has explored the important, complex and dynamic domain of rural e-governance. Globally, as ICTs rapidly advance and the socioeconomic environments in rural regions evolve, new opportunities and challenges arise in these traditionally underserved and understudied communities, presenting unique questions for academics, policymakers and practitioners in both public and private sectors. Among different academic fields, IS could be in a unique position, with the potential to bridge learning from different disciplines and offer important insights into designing ICT-related solutions for rural e-governance. The research framework presented in this paper has highlighted the versatility and diversity of IS research. Based on the framework, we identify several potential avenues for future research.

This article is based on the existing literature.

Abstract Image

信息通信技术与农村电子政务:从数字设计到公共政策
在过去的三十年中,信息和通信技术(ict)显著地塑造了全球公共组织和公共政策的出现和演变。信息通信技术的迅速发展促进了电子政务的发展,电子政务广泛包括在政府管理、公共服务、利益攸关方参与和其他活动中使用信息通信技术。根据联合国《2024年电子政务调查》,世界各地越来越多地利用信息通信技术来增强政府服务,而“服务的快速数字化、向远程工作的转变、人工智能(AI)的整合、对数字身份和数据管理的重视,以及在决策中更多地使用数据和新兴技术是关键的全球大趋势”(联合国2024年,21日)。尽管公共部门采用了信息通信技术,电子政务也取得了进展,但在当今的数字时代,农村社区仍然得不到充分的服务(联合国,2024年),在某种程度上,电子政务文献对农村社区的研究也不足。今天,超过40%的世界人口生活在农村地区(联合国2018年;世界银行2024年),包括资源有限和基础设施不足的地区,可能对公共服务和社会经济发展构成重大挑战。信息通信技术带来了独特的价值主张和承诺,同时也带来了风险和挑战。在扩大农村社区获得数字基础设施的机会、农业创新和加强粮食安全、部署医疗保健应用和服务、促进性别平等、减少包括数字鸿沟在内的不平等、促进教育和就业、可持续发展和保护濒危动物等领域,机会尤其突出(国际电联2021年)。来自公共政策、农村研究、发展社会学、发展经济学和信息系统(IS)等多个领域的研究反映了电子政务的多层面和复杂性,探讨了相关主题(例如,Banerjee et al. 2020; Dawes 2008; Salemink et al. 2017; Slavova and Metiu 2022; Xiao et al. 2013)。在这些领域中,以技术为重点的信息通信系统具有独特的潜力,可以对信息通信技术在实现和改善公共服务方面的作用产生细致而有价值的见解。信息通信技术文献的研究结果展示并详细说明了不同形式的信息通信技术,从大型机、台式机、互联网和蜂窝服务等成熟技术,到云、移动应用、物联网、区块链、元宇宙和人工智能等新兴技术,如何越来越多地作为政府、公共部门组织、个人、公司和社会行动者之间互动的场合(例如,Brown and Thompson 2011;Chua and Storey 2022;Dunleavy et al. 2006;Engesmo and Panteli 2020;Kauffman and techatassansonon2009;梅耶尔2015;Oborn等人,2019;Reddick 2004;苏2011)。在信息系统文献中,一系列研究探讨了农村背景下利用信息通信技术的治理和发展,迈出了揭示信息通信技术在农村电子治理方面潜力的第一步。例如,首先,与技术相关的举措可以改善数字应用,弥合贫困地区(包括农村地区)的数字鸿沟(Masiero和Das, 2019年;Srivastava和Shainesh, 2015年;Venkatesh和Sykes, 2013年)。其次,信息通信技术可以通过增加获得医疗保健的机会和降低死亡率(Venkatesh et al. 2020),促进妇女的收入(Bailur和Masiero, 2017)和健康。第三,电子商务正在改变农村经济,促进了农村电子商务生态系统的形成(Leong et al. 2016)、农村社区能力的发展(Cui et al. 2019)、消除贫困(Jha et al. 2016; Li et al. 2019)以及社会创新和可持续性(Tim et al. 2021)。与此同时,如何为农村电子政务设计、开发、部署、利用和评估信息通信技术,仍然是政策制定者和实践者面临的一个复杂问题,也是学术界尚未充分探索但重要的研究领域。在本文的其余部分中,我们首先基于学术研究和实践者的见解,简要概述了电子政务中ict的发展。根据文献,我们还确定了几个主题,这些主题代表了在农村电子政务中设计和使用信息通信技术的挑战和机遇。然后,我们提出了一个框架,用于概念化和设想用于农村电子政务的信息通信技术研究。在此框架的基础上,接下来,我们将介绍本期特刊中的文章,并讨论这些研究如何以不同但互补的方式为农村电子政务研究做出贡献。最后,我们探讨了信息通信技术和农村电子政务未来研究的潜在机会和方向。 在过去的几十年里,电子政务的前景发生了重大变化。这一演变跨越多个领域,包括所采用的具体信息通信技术,围绕这些技术的制度、组织、文化和社会环境,以及世界各地设计、部署和采用这些技术的不同地区的社会经济条件。在下文中,我们将重点关注电子政务技术的发展。表1提供了演进的摘要。由于计算机和电信技术开始在公共部门系统地采用,电子政务的信息通信技术的具体类型可以大致分为几个时期(例如,Dawes 2008):上世纪90年代之前的大型机时代、90年代的个人电脑时代、90年代末和21世纪初的互联网时代以及后来被称为Web 1.0的时代、21世纪后的Web 2.0时代,以及从区块链到人工智能等各种潜在颠覆性技术的时代。特别是农村的电子政务带来了独特的挑战和机遇。农村研究和相关学科领域的研究表明,农村地区传统上一直难以适应数字经济并从中受益(例如,Malecki 2003; Venkatachalam和McDowell 2003; Warren 2007)。在当今数字时代,城乡之间仍然存在巨大的数字鸿沟,影响着世界各地农村地区的治理和发展。具体而言,数字技术的设计和使用在城市和农村地区之间以及在世界各地的农村社区之间都是不平衡的。这种差异在发达经济体和发展中经济体都可以观察到(Roberts et al. 2017)。对现有研究的回顾表明,在设计和使用ict促进农村电子政务方面,有几个最突出的主题既代表挑战,也代表机遇。现有的研究和实践已经证明了ict在社会经济发展(包括农村地区的发展)中的价值和潜力(例如,Díaz Andrade等人,2019;Heeks等人,2021;Nicholson等人,2021)。面对农村电子政务等复杂现象的模糊性、多面性和跨学科性质(例如,Rittel and Webber 1973; Simon 1996),信息通信技术的日益进步和采用有助于设计创新解决方案(例如,Brown 2009; Manzini 2015)。现有的电子政务研究表明,考虑到技术、政策和利益相关者等多种因素,对电子政务计划进行战略规划和设计,可以帮助实现预期收益,同时解决电子政务计划的障碍(例如,Dawes et al. 2016; Janssen et al. 2020)。在信息系统领域,设计基于信息通信技术的解决方案来解决复杂的社会经济问题一直是一个突出的主题。信息系统研究和相关文献的一个子集讨论了设计电子政务解决方案的主题(例如,Goldkuhl 2016)。利用信通技术作为解决方案的设计在农村地区也被证明是成功的(例如,Venkatesh和Sykes, 2013年)。为了帮助学者和实践者对现有研究进行概念化,并设想ict在农村电子政务方面的未来工作,我们在下文中提出了一个研究框架。值得注意的是,该框架的目标不是提供文献的全面分类,而是为研究制定路线图,例如不同的研究可以共同为设计基于ict的农村电子政务解决方案做出贡献(图1)。下面,我们将介绍本期特刊的三篇文章。文章涉及农村电子政务的不同方面,并采用不同的方法,包括定量、定性、混合方法和基于设计的研究。我们还使用这些文章来说明上面提出的概念框架(图2)。第一篇论文,“发展信息和通信技术(ICT)用于农村电子政务的挑战:生态学视角”,由Shou等人(2025)撰写,分析了可以在农村景观的不同部门中加强电子政务的各种ICT应用。本文的理论基础是生态学视角(例如,Nardi和O’day 2000),该视角在is文献中被采用并应用于探索多种现象(例如,Miranda et al. 2022; Wang 2021)。在农村电子政务的背景下,生态学的视角强调了农村数字生态系统中不同元素之间的异质性和复杂关系。 基于生态学视角,本研究采用了一种研究方法,即对ICT利用对农村电子政务的重大但不同的影响进行定量调查,并通过定性分析来识别农村电子政务面临的各种挑战,并提出一套策略。这些战略可以为政策制定者提供指导,以应对已确定的挑战并推进农村电子政务。总体而言,本研究位于研究框架的右上角,因为它揭示了农村地区互联的、基于信息通信技术的生态系统,并为政策制定者制定了有价值的干预策略。第二篇论文“信息和通信技术能否推动农村地区有效的空间治理?”Tong等人(2025)的《中国农村电子参与生态系统的出现》,重点关注农村地区背景下ict在空间和领土治理中的设计和使用(Angelidou 2014; Dadashpoor和Yousefi 2018; Gagliardi等人2017;Santinha和Anselmo de Castro 2010; Sun等人2021、2024)。具体而言,该研究报告了基于信息通信技术的设计、实施和结果,涉及设计师、政府官员和农村社区村民的合作努力。虽然与本期特刊的其他论文相比,本研究也展示了信息通信技术在农村电子政务中的价值,但本研究侧重于技术的具体实例及其用例和影响,这将本研究置于研究框架的左下方区域。陈、程等人(2025)的第三篇论文《信息通信技术平台如何塑造农村电子政务:以微县平台上的赵楼村为例》分析了数字平台对政策部署的影响。具体而言,该研究显示了该平台如何在农村环境中塑造关键利益相关者(包括地方政府和村民)之间的紧张关系和互动。采用实证案例研究作为研究策略(Su 2018; Yin 2014),本文的研究结果对ICT影响农村电子政务的机制提供了细致入微的见解。例如,研究发现,面对政府与村民之间的紧张关系,数字平台和相关活动可以增强两个利益相关者之间的互动,最终促进妥协,从而有助于有效的政策部署。总体而言,本研究可以定位在研究框架的中间区域,因为该研究试图将单个数字平台与围绕该平台的信息通信技术支持的社会进程联系起来,同时揭示技术与政策之间的联系。综上所述,现有的多学科研究已经探索了农村电子政务的重要、复杂和动态领域。在全球范围内,随着信息通信技术的快速发展和农村地区社会经济环境的演变,这些传统上服务不足和研究不足的社区出现了新的机遇和挑战,给公共和私营部门的学者、政策制定者和从业者提出了独特的问题。在不同的学术领域中,信息系统可能处于独特的地位,有可能衔接不同学科的学习,并为设计与信息通信技术相关的农村电子政务解决方案提供重要见解。本文提出的研究框架突出了信息系统研究的多功能性和多样性。基于该框架,我们确定了未来研究的几个潜在途径。本文是在已有文献的基础上进行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Information Systems Journal
Information Systems Journal INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
14.60
自引率
7.80%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Information Systems Journal (ISJ) is an international journal promoting the study of, and interest in, information systems. Articles are welcome on research, practice, experience, current issues and debates. The ISJ encourages submissions that reflect the wide and interdisciplinary nature of the subject and articles that integrate technological disciplines with social, contextual and management issues, based on research using appropriate research methods.The ISJ has particularly built its reputation by publishing qualitative research and it continues to welcome such papers. Quantitative research papers are also welcome but they need to emphasise the context of the research and the theoretical and practical implications of their findings.The ISJ does not publish purely technical papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书