Graman Revisited Once Again: A Reanalysis of the Late Holocene Legacy Faunal Assemblage From GB4 Rockshelter, New South Wales

IF 1 3区 历史学 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Archaeology in Oceania Pub Date : 2026-04-13 Epub Date: 2026-03-19 DOI:10.1002/arco.70022
Loukas George Koungoulos, Jane Balme, Sue O'Connor
{"title":"Graman Revisited Once Again: A Reanalysis of the Late Holocene Legacy Faunal Assemblage From GB4 Rockshelter, New South Wales","authors":"Loukas George Koungoulos,&nbsp;Jane Balme,&nbsp;Sue O'Connor","doi":"10.1002/arco.70022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The archaeological site Graman B4 provided one of the first records of substantial dietary change in ancient Australian Aboriginal society. Initial examination of the faunal remains from this site suggested that Late Holocene hunters reduced their focus on high-ranked kangaroos to increasingly rely on arboreal possums; and that these subsistence changes were concurrent with changes in foragers’ toolkits, namely discontinuation of backed artefacts and adoption of ground-edged axes. These phenomena apparently echoed technological and subsistence developments observed elsewhere in Australia during the Late Holocene. Recent analysis of material from elsewhere in the Graman complex (GB1) did not match this pattern. However, differences in the chronology of the two sites meant that GB4 itself required reexamination to resolve this issue. Here, we describe a zooarchaeological reanalysis of GB4's faunal assemblage. Reanalysis shows that this site contains a substantially greater diversity of fauna than originally published and or which is known from GB1. Both sites, however, indicate that large macropods were always the main source of animal protein at Graman, with an emergent specialisation on possums from ∼3250 calBP. There is little evidence of adverse environmental change at Graman, and hunting activity or productivity appear to increase at the onset of the ENSO intensification and with the arrival of the dingo. We explore the possibility that novel extractive technologies, including tamed dingoes used in hunting, may be connected to the economic restructuring observed during the Late Holocene at Graman.</p>","PeriodicalId":46465,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology in Oceania","volume":"61 1","pages":"199-220"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/arco.70022","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology in Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/arco.70022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The archaeological site Graman B4 provided one of the first records of substantial dietary change in ancient Australian Aboriginal society. Initial examination of the faunal remains from this site suggested that Late Holocene hunters reduced their focus on high-ranked kangaroos to increasingly rely on arboreal possums; and that these subsistence changes were concurrent with changes in foragers’ toolkits, namely discontinuation of backed artefacts and adoption of ground-edged axes. These phenomena apparently echoed technological and subsistence developments observed elsewhere in Australia during the Late Holocene. Recent analysis of material from elsewhere in the Graman complex (GB1) did not match this pattern. However, differences in the chronology of the two sites meant that GB4 itself required reexamination to resolve this issue. Here, we describe a zooarchaeological reanalysis of GB4's faunal assemblage. Reanalysis shows that this site contains a substantially greater diversity of fauna than originally published and or which is known from GB1. Both sites, however, indicate that large macropods were always the main source of animal protein at Graman, with an emergent specialisation on possums from ∼3250 calBP. There is little evidence of adverse environmental change at Graman, and hunting activity or productivity appear to increase at the onset of the ENSO intensification and with the arrival of the dingo. We explore the possibility that novel extractive technologies, including tamed dingoes used in hunting, may be connected to the economic restructuring observed during the Late Holocene at Graman.

Abstract Image

再次访问格拉曼:对新南威尔士州GB4 Rockshelter晚全新世遗留动物组合的重新分析
考古遗址Graman B4提供了古代澳大利亚土著社会饮食发生重大变化的最早记录之一。对该遗址动物群遗骸的初步研究表明,全新世晚期的猎人减少了对高级袋鼠的关注,越来越多地依赖于树栖负鼠;这些生存变化与采集者工具箱的变化同时发生,即停止使用有背的人工制品和采用磨边轴。这些现象显然与全新世晚期在澳大利亚其他地方观察到的技术和生存发展相呼应。最近对格拉曼复合体(GB1)其他地方的材料的分析与这种模式不符。然而,这两个地点的年代差异意味着GB4本身需要重新检查才能解决这个问题。在这里,我们描述了对GB4的动物群组合的动物考古学重新分析。重新分析表明,该遗址包含的动物群多样性比最初公布的或从GB1已知的要大得多。然而,这两个地点都表明,大型巨足动物一直是Graman动物蛋白质的主要来源,并且从3250 calBP开始就出现了负鼠的专门研究。格拉曼几乎没有不利环境变化的证据,狩猎活动或生产力似乎在ENSO加剧的开始和野狗的到来时有所增加。我们探索了新的采掘技术的可能性,包括用于狩猎的驯服澳洲野狗,可能与格拉曼晚全新世观察到的经济重组有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: Archaeology in Oceania is published online and in print versions three times a year: April, July, October. It accepts articles and research reports in prehistoric and historical archaeology, modern material culture and human biology of ancient and modern human populations. Its primary geographic focus is Australia, the islands of the Pacific Ocean and lands of the western Pacific rim. All articles and research reports accepted as being within the remit of the journal and of appropriate standard will be reviewed by two scholars; authors will be informed of these comments though not necessarily of the reviewer’s names.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书