A flexible model of food security: Estimation and implications for prediction

IF 4.9 2区 经济学 Q1 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY
American Journal of Agricultural Economics Pub Date : 2026-04-02 Epub Date: 2025-08-28 DOI:10.1111/ajae.70012
Will Davis, José Xilau, Rusty Tchernis, Christian Gregory
{"title":"A flexible model of food security: Estimation and implications for prediction","authors":"Will Davis,&nbsp;José Xilau,&nbsp;Rusty Tchernis,&nbsp;Christian Gregory","doi":"10.1111/ajae.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We propose a novel Bayesian Graded Response Model (BGRM) for measuring household-level food security and other latent traits. The BGRM produces continuous food security estimates along with household-level measures of estimation uncertainty. Unlike the USDA's official model, the BGRM accommodates both binary and ordered polytomous items. We further extend the model to allow for any combination of binary, ordered polytomous, and even continuous variables. To demonstrate the model's features, we estimate the BGRM using responses to the 10 adult core Food Security Module questions from the 2017–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results show non-trivial uncertainty in household-level food security estimates and overlap across USDA-defined food security categories. As a robustness check, we estimate the model with Current Population Survey data, finding qualitatively similar results. We illustrate an application of the continuous food security estimates by calculating Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke indices which capture the prevalence, depth, and severity of food insecurity. To demonstrate flexibility in variable selection, we also include a continuous variable, household-level <i>monthly food spending</i>, capturing both economic access and experiential food security information in a single latent construct. The adaptability of the BGRM positions it as a versatile tool for measuring food security and related latent traits, particularly when measures of uncertainty or a mix of different variable types are required. While the empirical application illustrates model capabilities, the primary contribution of the study is methodological.</p>","PeriodicalId":55537,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","volume":"108 3","pages":"954-980"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Agricultural Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajae.70012","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We propose a novel Bayesian Graded Response Model (BGRM) for measuring household-level food security and other latent traits. The BGRM produces continuous food security estimates along with household-level measures of estimation uncertainty. Unlike the USDA's official model, the BGRM accommodates both binary and ordered polytomous items. We further extend the model to allow for any combination of binary, ordered polytomous, and even continuous variables. To demonstrate the model's features, we estimate the BGRM using responses to the 10 adult core Food Security Module questions from the 2017–2018 National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Results show non-trivial uncertainty in household-level food security estimates and overlap across USDA-defined food security categories. As a robustness check, we estimate the model with Current Population Survey data, finding qualitatively similar results. We illustrate an application of the continuous food security estimates by calculating Foster, Greer, and Thorbecke indices which capture the prevalence, depth, and severity of food insecurity. To demonstrate flexibility in variable selection, we also include a continuous variable, household-level monthly food spending, capturing both economic access and experiential food security information in a single latent construct. The adaptability of the BGRM positions it as a versatile tool for measuring food security and related latent traits, particularly when measures of uncertainty or a mix of different variable types are required. While the empirical application illustrates model capabilities, the primary contribution of the study is methodological.

一个灵活的粮食安全模型:估算及其对预测的影响
我们提出了一种新的贝叶斯分级响应模型(BGRM)来衡量家庭层面的粮食安全和其他潜在特征。BGRM产生连续的粮食安全估计以及家庭层面的估计不确定性措施。与美国农业部的官方模型不同,BGRM同时容纳二元和有序的多元项目。我们进一步扩展了该模型,以允许二元、有序多元甚至连续变量的任何组合。为了展示模型的特征,我们使用对2017-2018年国家健康与营养检查调查(NHANES)中10个成人核心食品安全模块问题的回答来估计BGRM。结果显示,在家庭层面的粮食安全估计中存在不小的不确定性,并且美国农业部定义的粮食安全类别存在重叠。作为稳健性检查,我们用当前人口调查数据估计模型,发现质量相似的结果。我们通过计算捕捉粮食不安全的普遍性、深度和严重性的Foster、Greer和Thorbecke指数来说明连续粮食安全估计的应用。为了展示变量选择的灵活性,我们还包括一个连续变量,家庭层面的每月食品支出,在一个潜在结构中捕获经济获取和经验食品安全信息。BGRM的适应性使其成为衡量粮食安全和相关潜在特征的通用工具,特别是在需要测量不确定性或不同变量类型的混合时。虽然实证应用说明了模型的能力,但研究的主要贡献是方法论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Agricultural Economics
American Journal of Agricultural Economics 管理科学-农业经济与政策
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.80%
发文量
77
审稿时长
12-24 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Agricultural Economics provides a forum for creative and scholarly work on the economics of agriculture and food, natural resources and the environment, and rural and community development throughout the world. Papers should relate to one of these areas, should have a problem orientation, and should demonstrate originality and innovation in analysis, methods, or application. Analyses of problems pertinent to research, extension, and teaching are equally encouraged, as is interdisciplinary research with a significant economic component. Review articles that offer a comprehensive and insightful survey of a relevant subject, consistent with the scope of the Journal as discussed above, will also be considered. All articles published, regardless of their nature, will be held to the same set of scholarly standards.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书