“There Are Risks, but I Will Use It Anyway”: Predicting the Urge to Regulate and the Intended Use of Generative AI Among Youth in Four Countries

IF 4.9 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Jörg Matthes, Selma Hodzic, Anja Stevic, Andreas Nanz, Alice Binder, Michael Chan, Ljubiša Bojić
{"title":"“There Are Risks, but I Will Use It Anyway”: Predicting the Urge to Regulate and the Intended Use of Generative AI Among Youth in Four Countries","authors":"Jörg Matthes,&nbsp;Selma Hodzic,&nbsp;Anja Stevic,&nbsp;Andreas Nanz,&nbsp;Alice Binder,&nbsp;Michael Chan,&nbsp;Ljubiša Bojić","doi":"10.1155/hbe2/3060652","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Generative AI is rapidly evolving, yet our understanding of how the public assesses and evaluates this technology remains limited. This is particularly true for youths who traditionally are early adopters of new technologies. Our study investigates how sociodemographic variables as well as risk perceptions influence youths′ future urge to regulate as well as their future intention to use generative AI in Indonesia, Austria, Serbia, and Hong Kong (China). Using quota-based survey data, we find a limited explanatory value of sociodemographic variables. Interestingly, our findings suggest that information-related risks cannot increase the urge to regulate as well as dampen the intended use among youth. However, perceived social risks unequivocally explain the urge to regulate across countries. Also, the effect of perceived social risks on the urge to regulate is reduced with rising levels of prior use of generative AI. By and large, findings suggest that young individuals perceive risks, but that does not necessarily dampen their own willingness to use generative AI. Implications are discussed. This study is among the first to offer cross-cultural insights into how youth across both European and Asian contexts perceive and engage with generative AI.</p>","PeriodicalId":36408,"journal":{"name":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","volume":"2026 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/hbe2/3060652","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/hbe2/3060652","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Generative AI is rapidly evolving, yet our understanding of how the public assesses and evaluates this technology remains limited. This is particularly true for youths who traditionally are early adopters of new technologies. Our study investigates how sociodemographic variables as well as risk perceptions influence youths′ future urge to regulate as well as their future intention to use generative AI in Indonesia, Austria, Serbia, and Hong Kong (China). Using quota-based survey data, we find a limited explanatory value of sociodemographic variables. Interestingly, our findings suggest that information-related risks cannot increase the urge to regulate as well as dampen the intended use among youth. However, perceived social risks unequivocally explain the urge to regulate across countries. Also, the effect of perceived social risks on the urge to regulate is reduced with rising levels of prior use of generative AI. By and large, findings suggest that young individuals perceive risks, but that does not necessarily dampen their own willingness to use generative AI. Implications are discussed. This study is among the first to offer cross-cultural insights into how youth across both European and Asian contexts perceive and engage with generative AI.

Abstract Image

“风险是存在的,但我无论如何都会使用它”:预测四个国家的年轻人对生成式人工智能的监管冲动和预期用途
生成式人工智能正在迅速发展,但我们对公众如何评估和评估这项技术的理解仍然有限。对于传统上是新技术早期采用者的年轻人来说尤其如此。我们的研究调查了社会人口变量以及风险感知如何影响印度尼西亚、奥地利、塞尔维亚和中国香港的年轻人未来监管的冲动,以及他们未来使用生成式人工智能的意图。使用基于配额的调查数据,我们发现社会人口变量的解释价值有限。有趣的是,我们的研究结果表明,与信息相关的风险既不能增加青少年对信息的管制冲动,也不能抑制青少年对信息的预期使用。然而,感知到的社会风险明确解释了各国监管的紧迫性。此外,感知到的社会风险对监管冲动的影响随着事先使用生成式人工智能的水平的提高而降低。总的来说,研究结果表明,年轻人能够感知风险,但这并不一定会抑制他们自己使用生成式人工智能的意愿。讨论了影响。这项研究是首批提供跨文化见解的研究之一,旨在了解欧洲和亚洲的年轻人如何感知和参与生成式人工智能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies
Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
17.20
自引率
8.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies is an interdisciplinary journal dedicated to publishing high-impact research that enhances understanding of the complex interactions between diverse human behavior and emerging digital technologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书