Marco Basile, Maximilian Pichler, Francesco Valerio, Lorenzo Balducci, Francesco Chianucci, Sérgio Godinho, Francesco Rota, Frédéric Archaux, Christophe Bouget, Gediminas Brazaitis, Thomas Campagnaro, Ettore D'Andrea, Luc De Keersmaeker, Wouter Dekoninck, Pallieter De Smedt, Zoltán Elek, Itziar García- Mijangos, Frédéric Gosselin, Marion Gosselin, Andrin Gross, Elena Haeler, Sebastian Kepfer- Rojas, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Daniel Kozák, Thibault Lachat, Carlos Miguel Landivar Albis, Anja Leyman, Xiang Liu, Anders Mårell, Radim Matula, Martin Mikoláš, Péter Ódor, Yoan Paillet, Kastytis Šimkevičius, Tommaso Sitzia, Silvia Stofer, Nicolas Strebel, Miroslav Svoboda, Flóra Tinya, Mariana Ujházyová, Kris Vandekerkhove, Kris Verheyen, Michael Wohlwend, Fotios Xystrakis, Sabina Burrascano
{"title":"Harnessing the power of machine and deep learning for transferring joint species distribution models considering the structure of biotic interactions","authors":"Marco Basile, Maximilian Pichler, Francesco Valerio, Lorenzo Balducci, Francesco Chianucci, Sérgio Godinho, Francesco Rota, Frédéric Archaux, Christophe Bouget, Gediminas Brazaitis, Thomas Campagnaro, Ettore D'Andrea, Luc De Keersmaeker, Wouter Dekoninck, Pallieter De Smedt, Zoltán Elek, Itziar García- Mijangos, Frédéric Gosselin, Marion Gosselin, Andrin Gross, Elena Haeler, Sebastian Kepfer- Rojas, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Daniel Kozák, Thibault Lachat, Carlos Miguel Landivar Albis, Anja Leyman, Xiang Liu, Anders Mårell, Radim Matula, Martin Mikoláš, Péter Ódor, Yoan Paillet, Kastytis Šimkevičius, Tommaso Sitzia, Silvia Stofer, Nicolas Strebel, Miroslav Svoboda, Flóra Tinya, Mariana Ujházyová, Kris Vandekerkhove, Kris Verheyen, Michael Wohlwend, Fotios Xystrakis, Sabina Burrascano","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transferability of single or joint species distribution models ((j)SDMs) depends on their ability to predict beyond the observed environmental range and to remain consistent despite shifts in biotic interactions. Transfer accuracy may be improved by recent advances in the application of deep learning that provide greater flexibility and potentially superior predictive accuracy than traditional approaches. We implemented jSDMs with deep and machine learning algorithms and measured the transfer accuracy from continental to regional areas in communities with different species composition. We ran jSDMs with deep neural networks (DNN), elastic net (EN), and stacked SDMs (sSDM) with random forests (RF). We used 134 689 occurrence records representing 1776 species of six taxonomic groups (beetles, birds, bryophytes, fungi, lichens and plants) from 2387 forest plots in Europe. We employed an agnostic modelling approach that covered most of the environmental conditions by including more than 100 satellite-derived variables and 98 climatic variables. The predictive power of the models within the training continental area was evaluated using AUC, whereas the transfer accuracy in the regional area was evaluated with the Boyce index calculated with independent presence records. We found that the DNN–jSDMs outperformed other models at continental scale, but model transfer from continental to regional extent was less accurate. We found that the accuracy of regional predictions was higher for taxonomic groups with better representation in the continental data, such as birds, bryophytes and plants. Depending on the algorithm and the taxonomic group, we achieved acceptable (Boyce > 0) to accurate (Boyce > 0.5) transferability for 32–78% of the species. Our findings underscored the need of considering trade-offs among hyperparameter tuning, spatial scales and model complexity. Our findings also suggest that the varying biotic interaction structures and, particularly, the different species compositions of the transfer areas, may affect model transferability more than previously considered.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"440 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The transferability of single or joint species distribution models ((j)SDMs) depends on their ability to predict beyond the observed environmental range and to remain consistent despite shifts in biotic interactions. Transfer accuracy may be improved by recent advances in the application of deep learning that provide greater flexibility and potentially superior predictive accuracy than traditional approaches. We implemented jSDMs with deep and machine learning algorithms and measured the transfer accuracy from continental to regional areas in communities with different species composition. We ran jSDMs with deep neural networks (DNN), elastic net (EN), and stacked SDMs (sSDM) with random forests (RF). We used 134 689 occurrence records representing 1776 species of six taxonomic groups (beetles, birds, bryophytes, fungi, lichens and plants) from 2387 forest plots in Europe. We employed an agnostic modelling approach that covered most of the environmental conditions by including more than 100 satellite-derived variables and 98 climatic variables. The predictive power of the models within the training continental area was evaluated using AUC, whereas the transfer accuracy in the regional area was evaluated with the Boyce index calculated with independent presence records. We found that the DNN–jSDMs outperformed other models at continental scale, but model transfer from continental to regional extent was less accurate. We found that the accuracy of regional predictions was higher for taxonomic groups with better representation in the continental data, such as birds, bryophytes and plants. Depending on the algorithm and the taxonomic group, we achieved acceptable (Boyce > 0) to accurate (Boyce > 0.5) transferability for 32–78% of the species. Our findings underscored the need of considering trade-offs among hyperparameter tuning, spatial scales and model complexity. Our findings also suggest that the varying biotic interaction structures and, particularly, the different species compositions of the transfer areas, may affect model transferability more than previously considered.
期刊介绍:
ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem.
Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography.
Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.