Harnessing the power of machine and deep learning for transferring joint species distribution models considering the structure of biotic interactions

IF 4.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Ecography Pub Date : 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1002/ecog.08269
Marco Basile, Maximilian Pichler, Francesco Valerio, Lorenzo Balducci, Francesco Chianucci, Sérgio Godinho, Francesco Rota, Frédéric Archaux, Christophe Bouget, Gediminas Brazaitis, Thomas Campagnaro, Ettore D'Andrea, Luc De Keersmaeker, Wouter Dekoninck, Pallieter De Smedt, Zoltán Elek, Itziar García- Mijangos, Frédéric Gosselin, Marion Gosselin, Andrin Gross, Elena Haeler, Sebastian Kepfer- Rojas, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Daniel Kozák, Thibault Lachat, Carlos Miguel Landivar Albis, Anja Leyman, Xiang Liu, Anders Mårell, Radim Matula, Martin Mikoláš, Péter Ódor, Yoan Paillet, Kastytis Šimkevičius, Tommaso Sitzia, Silvia Stofer, Nicolas Strebel, Miroslav Svoboda, Flóra Tinya, Mariana Ujházyová, Kris Vandekerkhove, Kris Verheyen, Michael Wohlwend, Fotios Xystrakis, Sabina Burrascano
{"title":"Harnessing the power of machine and deep learning for transferring joint species distribution models considering the structure of biotic interactions","authors":"Marco Basile, Maximilian Pichler, Francesco Valerio, Lorenzo Balducci, Francesco Chianucci, Sérgio Godinho, Francesco Rota, Frédéric Archaux, Christophe Bouget, Gediminas Brazaitis, Thomas Campagnaro, Ettore D'Andrea, Luc De Keersmaeker, Wouter Dekoninck, Pallieter De Smedt, Zoltán Elek, Itziar García- Mijangos, Frédéric Gosselin, Marion Gosselin, Andrin Gross, Elena Haeler, Sebastian Kepfer- Rojas, Nathalie Korboulewsky, Daniel Kozák, Thibault Lachat, Carlos Miguel Landivar Albis, Anja Leyman, Xiang Liu, Anders Mårell, Radim Matula, Martin Mikoláš, Péter Ódor, Yoan Paillet, Kastytis Šimkevičius, Tommaso Sitzia, Silvia Stofer, Nicolas Strebel, Miroslav Svoboda, Flóra Tinya, Mariana Ujházyová, Kris Vandekerkhove, Kris Verheyen, Michael Wohlwend, Fotios Xystrakis, Sabina Burrascano","doi":"10.1002/ecog.08269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The transferability of single or joint species distribution models ((j)SDMs) depends on their ability to predict beyond the observed environmental range and to remain consistent despite shifts in biotic interactions. Transfer accuracy may be improved by recent advances in the application of deep learning that provide greater flexibility and potentially superior predictive accuracy than traditional approaches. We implemented jSDMs with deep and machine learning algorithms and measured the transfer accuracy from continental to regional areas in communities with different species composition. We ran jSDMs with deep neural networks (DNN), elastic net (EN), and stacked SDMs (sSDM) with random forests (RF). We used 134 689 occurrence records representing 1776 species of six taxonomic groups (beetles, birds, bryophytes, fungi, lichens and plants) from 2387 forest plots in Europe. We employed an agnostic modelling approach that covered most of the environmental conditions by including more than 100 satellite-derived variables and 98 climatic variables. The predictive power of the models within the training continental area was evaluated using AUC, whereas the transfer accuracy in the regional area was evaluated with the Boyce index calculated with independent presence records. We found that the DNN–jSDMs outperformed other models at continental scale, but model transfer from continental to regional extent was less accurate. We found that the accuracy of regional predictions was higher for taxonomic groups with better representation in the continental data, such as birds, bryophytes and plants. Depending on the algorithm and the taxonomic group, we achieved acceptable (Boyce > 0) to accurate (Boyce > 0.5) transferability for 32–78% of the species. Our findings underscored the need of considering trade-offs among hyperparameter tuning, spatial scales and model complexity. Our findings also suggest that the varying biotic interaction structures and, particularly, the different species compositions of the transfer areas, may affect model transferability more than previously considered.","PeriodicalId":51026,"journal":{"name":"Ecography","volume":"440 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecography","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ecog.08269","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The transferability of single or joint species distribution models ((j)SDMs) depends on their ability to predict beyond the observed environmental range and to remain consistent despite shifts in biotic interactions. Transfer accuracy may be improved by recent advances in the application of deep learning that provide greater flexibility and potentially superior predictive accuracy than traditional approaches. We implemented jSDMs with deep and machine learning algorithms and measured the transfer accuracy from continental to regional areas in communities with different species composition. We ran jSDMs with deep neural networks (DNN), elastic net (EN), and stacked SDMs (sSDM) with random forests (RF). We used 134 689 occurrence records representing 1776 species of six taxonomic groups (beetles, birds, bryophytes, fungi, lichens and plants) from 2387 forest plots in Europe. We employed an agnostic modelling approach that covered most of the environmental conditions by including more than 100 satellite-derived variables and 98 climatic variables. The predictive power of the models within the training continental area was evaluated using AUC, whereas the transfer accuracy in the regional area was evaluated with the Boyce index calculated with independent presence records. We found that the DNN–jSDMs outperformed other models at continental scale, but model transfer from continental to regional extent was less accurate. We found that the accuracy of regional predictions was higher for taxonomic groups with better representation in the continental data, such as birds, bryophytes and plants. Depending on the algorithm and the taxonomic group, we achieved acceptable (Boyce > 0) to accurate (Boyce > 0.5) transferability for 32–78% of the species. Our findings underscored the need of considering trade-offs among hyperparameter tuning, spatial scales and model complexity. Our findings also suggest that the varying biotic interaction structures and, particularly, the different species compositions of the transfer areas, may affect model transferability more than previously considered.
利用机器和深度学习的力量转移考虑生物相互作用结构的联合物种分布模型
单一或联合物种分布模型(SDMs)的可转移性取决于它们预测超出观测环境范围的能力,以及在生物相互作用发生变化时保持一致性的能力。最近深度学习应用的进展可能会提高迁移精度,深度学习提供了比传统方法更大的灵活性和潜在的更高的预测精度。我们利用深度学习和机器学习算法实现了jSDMs,并测量了不同物种组成的群落从大陆到区域的迁移精度。我们使用深度神经网络(DNN)、弹性网络(EN)和随机森林(RF)的堆叠sdm (sSDM)运行jsdm。本研究利用了2387个欧洲森林样地的6个类群(甲虫、鸟类、苔藓植物、真菌、地衣和植物)1776种的134 689条发生记录。我们采用了一种不可知论建模方法,通过包括100多个卫星衍生变量和98个气候变量,涵盖了大多数环境条件。使用AUC评估模型在训练大陆区域内的预测能力,使用独立存在记录计算的Boyce指数评估区域内的转移精度。我们发现DNN-jSDMs在大陆尺度上优于其他模式,但从大陆到区域范围的模式转移精度较低。我们发现,对于在大陆数据中代表性较好的分类类群,如鸟类、苔藓植物和植物,区域预测的准确性更高。根据算法和分类群的不同,我们在32-78%的物种中实现了可接受(Boyce > 0)到准确(Boyce > 0.5)的可转移性。我们的研究结果强调了需要考虑超参数调整、空间尺度和模型复杂性之间的权衡。我们的研究结果还表明,不同的生物相互作用结构,特别是迁移区域的不同物种组成,可能比以前认为的更能影响模型的可转移性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ecography
Ecography 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
3.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
8-16 weeks
期刊介绍: ECOGRAPHY publishes exciting, novel, and important articles that significantly advance understanding of ecological or biodiversity patterns in space or time. Papers focusing on conservation or restoration are welcomed, provided they are anchored in ecological theory and convey a general message that goes beyond a single case study. We encourage papers that seek advancing the field through the development and testing of theory or methodology, or by proposing new tools for analysis or interpretation of ecological phenomena. Manuscripts are expected to address general principles in ecology, though they may do so using a specific model system if they adequately frame the problem relative to a generalized ecological question or problem. Purely descriptive papers are considered only if breaking new ground and/or describing patterns seldom explored. Studies focused on a single species or single location are generally discouraged unless they make a significant contribution to advancing general theory or understanding of biodiversity patterns and processes. Manuscripts merely confirming or marginally extending results of previous work are unlikely to be considered in Ecography. Papers are judged by virtue of their originality, appeal to general interest, and their contribution to new developments in studies of spatial and temporal ecological patterns. There are no biases with regard to taxon, biome, or biogeographical area.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书