The use of pain scales in scientific studies on dentin hypersensitivity: A scoping study.

IF 17.8 1区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
C Gupta,M Barber,F Boissonade,N Flannigan,N Wong,B J Gibson
{"title":"The use of pain scales in scientific studies on dentin hypersensitivity: A scoping study.","authors":"C Gupta,M Barber,F Boissonade,N Flannigan,N Wong,B J Gibson","doi":"10.1111/prd.70043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\r\nThis scoping review aimed to identify the pain scales used to clinically evaluate dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in existing literature and the references provided for their selection.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nThe scoping review followed the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. An electronic search of the literature was conducted across Web of Science, PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible studies included adult participants with DH who were assessed using pain scales. After screening, data were extracted and synthesised to identify the most commonly used pain scales and the theoretical and methodological justification for their use.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSeventy-one studies were included in the review, and most of them were randomised studies (randomised clinical studies + RCTs = 81.7%). The visual analog scale (VAS) was the most frequently used pain measurement, followed by the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity scale (SCASS). Use of both scales together was also identified as a common practice. There were inconsistencies in the references provided as the rationale for the use of the pain measurement tools.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSIONS\r\nVAS and SCASS are unidimensional scales that are used in DH research without an adequate theoretical understanding of the condition and methodological considerations. More research needs to be conducted on the methodological suitability of the pain scales and the conceptual understanding of pain management in DH.","PeriodicalId":19736,"journal":{"name":"Periodontology 2000","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Periodontology 2000","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/prd.70043","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

OBJECTIVE This scoping review aimed to identify the pain scales used to clinically evaluate dentin hypersensitivity (DH) in existing literature and the references provided for their selection. METHODS The scoping review followed the PRISMA and JBI guidelines. An electronic search of the literature was conducted across Web of Science, PubMed (Medline), Scopus, and CINAHL. Eligible studies included adult participants with DH who were assessed using pain scales. After screening, data were extracted and synthesised to identify the most commonly used pain scales and the theoretical and methodological justification for their use. RESULTS Seventy-one studies were included in the review, and most of them were randomised studies (randomised clinical studies + RCTs = 81.7%). The visual analog scale (VAS) was the most frequently used pain measurement, followed by the Schiff Cold Air Sensitivity scale (SCASS). Use of both scales together was also identified as a common practice. There were inconsistencies in the references provided as the rationale for the use of the pain measurement tools. CONCLUSIONS VAS and SCASS are unidimensional scales that are used in DH research without an adequate theoretical understanding of the condition and methodological considerations. More research needs to be conducted on the methodological suitability of the pain scales and the conceptual understanding of pain management in DH.
疼痛量表在牙本质过敏科学研究中的应用:一项范围研究。
目的本综述旨在确定现有文献中用于临床评估牙本质过敏(DH)的疼痛量表,并为其选择提供参考。方法按照PRISMA和JBI指南进行范围审查。通过Web of Science、PubMed (Medline)、Scopus和CINAHL对文献进行了电子检索。符合条件的研究包括患有DH的成年参与者,他们使用疼痛量表进行评估。筛选后,提取数据并进行综合,以确定最常用的疼痛量表及其使用的理论和方法依据。结果纳入71项研究,以随机化研究居多(随机化临床研究+ rct = 81.7%)。视觉模拟量表(VAS)是最常用的疼痛测量方法,其次是希夫冷空气敏感性量表(SCASS)。同时使用两种尺度也被认为是一种常见的做法。作为使用疼痛测量工具的基本原理,参考文献中存在不一致之处。结论svas和SCASS是一种单维量表,在卫生保健研究中没有充分的理论认识和方法考虑。需要对疼痛量表的方法学适用性和DH对疼痛管理的概念理解进行更多的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Periodontology 2000
Periodontology 2000 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
34.10
自引率
2.20%
发文量
62
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Periodontology 2000 is a series of monographs designed for periodontists and general practitioners interested in periodontics. The editorial board selects significant topics and distinguished scientists and clinicians for each monograph. Serving as a valuable supplement to existing periodontal journals, three monographs are published annually, contributing specialized insights to the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书