Jarno Hakkers,Yvonne C M de Waal,Barzi Gareb,Henny J A Meijer,Gerry M Raghoebar
{"title":"Surgical Reconstructive Peri-Implantitis Treatment for 3- and 4-Wall Bone Defects: A Single-Blind Randomised Controlled Trial With a 1-Year Follow-Up.","authors":"Jarno Hakkers,Yvonne C M de Waal,Barzi Gareb,Henny J A Meijer,Gerry M Raghoebar","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIM\r\nTo evaluate the effect of a reconstructive procedure during surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in 3- or 4-wall bone defects on clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year follow-up.\r\n\r\nMATERIALS AND METHODS\r\nFifty-two patients with peri-implantitis were randomly assigned to surgical treatment with (n = 27) or without (n = 25) a reconstructive procedure using autologous bone, xenograft and a collagen membrane. Primary outcomes were the mean peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and radiographic marginal bone level (MBL). Bleeding on probing (BoP) was the prespecified primary outcome in the original protocol; the present report emphasises PPD and MBL outcomes relevant to reconstructive treatment. Secondary outcomes included BoP, disease resolution (composite treatment outcome), suppuration (SoP), mid-buccal recession (Midbuc REC) and keratinised mucosa (Midbuc KM). Data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects models.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nMixed-effects models showed that patients in the test group showed enhanced marginal bone levels at all follow-ups (β = -0.85 to -1.65 mm; p ≤ 0.04) and less mid-buccal recession (β = -1.06 to -1.68 mm; p ≤ 0.01) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed for PPD, BoP, SoP, Midbuc KM or disease resolution.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nWhile the adjunctive reconstructive procedure did not significantly influence peri-implant PPD, BoP, SoP or disease resolution, it was associated with improved radiographic marginal bone levels and reduced mid-buccal soft-tissue recession.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"68 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70123","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
AIM
To evaluate the effect of a reconstructive procedure during surgical treatment of peri-implantitis in 3- or 4-wall bone defects on clinical and radiographic outcomes after 1 year follow-up.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Fifty-two patients with peri-implantitis were randomly assigned to surgical treatment with (n = 27) or without (n = 25) a reconstructive procedure using autologous bone, xenograft and a collagen membrane. Primary outcomes were the mean peri-implant probing depth (PPD) and radiographic marginal bone level (MBL). Bleeding on probing (BoP) was the prespecified primary outcome in the original protocol; the present report emphasises PPD and MBL outcomes relevant to reconstructive treatment. Secondary outcomes included BoP, disease resolution (composite treatment outcome), suppuration (SoP), mid-buccal recession (Midbuc REC) and keratinised mucosa (Midbuc KM). Data were analysed using multilevel mixed-effects models.
RESULTS
Mixed-effects models showed that patients in the test group showed enhanced marginal bone levels at all follow-ups (β = -0.85 to -1.65 mm; p ≤ 0.04) and less mid-buccal recession (β = -1.06 to -1.68 mm; p ≤ 0.01) compared to the control group. No significant differences were observed for PPD, BoP, SoP, Midbuc KM or disease resolution.
CONCLUSION
While the adjunctive reconstructive procedure did not significantly influence peri-implant PPD, BoP, SoP or disease resolution, it was associated with improved radiographic marginal bone levels and reduced mid-buccal soft-tissue recession.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.