Nneoma O Duru,Austin J Stoner,Christopher Frey,Nicole S Pham,Henry B Ellis,Matthew R Schmitz,Yi-Meng Yen,Marc A Tompkins,Theodore J Ganley,Phil Wilson,Molly C Meadows,Charles Chan,Kevin G Shea
{"title":"Knee Chondral Shear Injury Repair: A Biomechanical Laboratory Comparison of Suture Bridge to Chondral Pin Fixation.","authors":"Nneoma O Duru,Austin J Stoner,Christopher Frey,Nicole S Pham,Henry B Ellis,Matthew R Schmitz,Yi-Meng Yen,Marc A Tompkins,Theodore J Ganley,Phil Wilson,Molly C Meadows,Charles Chan,Kevin G Shea","doi":"10.1177/03635465261436052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\r\nDelamination of chondral fragments in pediatric patients is common and is usually caused by osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) or patellar dislocations. For fragments with minimal to no bone, fixation with screws may not be ideal due to hardware prominence on the cartilage or suboptimal screw purchase, which can result in hardware migration and loss of fixation. Lower-profile chondral fixation devices may be ideal in these circumstances, such as the suture bridge fixation construct and bioabsorbable chondral pin fixation.\r\n\r\nHYPOTHESIS\r\nSuture bridge constructs would provide superior fixation over chondral pins for chondral shear injury fragments.\r\n\r\nSTUDY DESIGN\r\nControlled laboratory study.\r\n\r\nMETHODS\r\nSeven pediatric cadaveric femurs were utilized. Circular lesions, 15 mm in diameter, were created on both femoral condyles. One lesion was randomized to chondral pin repair, while the other received suture bridge repair using 2-0 suture fixated with suture anchors. Each specimen was then potted before undergoing biomechanical testing on a materials testing frame. Each construct underwent precyclic rotational shear testing, cyclic loading, and postcyclic rotational shear testing. The stiffness (N·m/deg) of each repair during pre- and postcyclic rotational shear testing was recorded and compared using paired t tests.\r\n\r\nRESULTS\r\nSuture bridge fixations, compared with chondral pin fixations, demonstrated significantly higher precycle stiffness (0.0113 vs 0.0067 N·m/deg; P = .0359) and postcycle stiffness (0.0215 vs 0.0089 N·m/deg; P = .0421). While all suture bridge repairs remained intact, 5 of 7 chondral pin repairs fully detached by the end of biomechanical testing.\r\n\r\nCONCLUSION\r\nSuture bridge repair demonstrated significantly higher fixation stiffness and durability compared with chondral dart repair in the pediatric cadaveric model.\r\n\r\nCLINICAL RELEVANCE\r\nThis study attempts to find the biomechanically superior construct for pediatric chondral shear injuries.","PeriodicalId":517411,"journal":{"name":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"3635465261436052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03635465261436052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Delamination of chondral fragments in pediatric patients is common and is usually caused by osteochondritis dissecans (OCD) or patellar dislocations. For fragments with minimal to no bone, fixation with screws may not be ideal due to hardware prominence on the cartilage or suboptimal screw purchase, which can result in hardware migration and loss of fixation. Lower-profile chondral fixation devices may be ideal in these circumstances, such as the suture bridge fixation construct and bioabsorbable chondral pin fixation.
HYPOTHESIS
Suture bridge constructs would provide superior fixation over chondral pins for chondral shear injury fragments.
STUDY DESIGN
Controlled laboratory study.
METHODS
Seven pediatric cadaveric femurs were utilized. Circular lesions, 15 mm in diameter, were created on both femoral condyles. One lesion was randomized to chondral pin repair, while the other received suture bridge repair using 2-0 suture fixated with suture anchors. Each specimen was then potted before undergoing biomechanical testing on a materials testing frame. Each construct underwent precyclic rotational shear testing, cyclic loading, and postcyclic rotational shear testing. The stiffness (N·m/deg) of each repair during pre- and postcyclic rotational shear testing was recorded and compared using paired t tests.
RESULTS
Suture bridge fixations, compared with chondral pin fixations, demonstrated significantly higher precycle stiffness (0.0113 vs 0.0067 N·m/deg; P = .0359) and postcycle stiffness (0.0215 vs 0.0089 N·m/deg; P = .0421). While all suture bridge repairs remained intact, 5 of 7 chondral pin repairs fully detached by the end of biomechanical testing.
CONCLUSION
Suture bridge repair demonstrated significantly higher fixation stiffness and durability compared with chondral dart repair in the pediatric cadaveric model.
CLINICAL RELEVANCE
This study attempts to find the biomechanically superior construct for pediatric chondral shear injuries.
背景:儿童患者软骨碎片分层是常见的,通常由夹层性骨软骨炎(OCD)或髌骨脱位引起。对于很少或没有骨头的碎片,由于软骨上的硬体突出或螺钉购买不理想,螺钉固定可能不理想,这可能导致硬体迁移和固定丧失。在这些情况下,较低轮廓的软骨固定装置可能是理想的,例如缝线桥固定结构和生物可吸收的软骨针固定。假设对于软骨剪切损伤碎片,骨桥结构将提供比软骨针更好的固定。研究设计:对照实验室研究。方法采用7根小儿尸体股骨。在两个股骨髁上形成直径为15mm的圆形病变。一个病变随机接受软骨针修复,而另一个病变接受缝合桥修复,使用2-0缝合与缝合锚钉固定。在材料测试架上进行生物力学测试之前,将每个标本装入容器。每个结构都进行了循环前旋转剪切试验、循环加载和循环后旋转剪切试验。在循环前后的旋转剪切试验中,记录每个修复的刚度(N·m/度),并使用配对t检验进行比较。结果缝线桥固定与软骨针固定相比,循环前刚度(0.0113 vs 0.0067 N·m/deg, P = 0.059)和循环后刚度(0.0215 vs 0.0089 N·m/deg, P = 0.0421)显著提高。所有缝合桥修复体保持完整,7个软骨针修复体中有5个在生物力学测试结束时完全分离。结论在小儿尸体模型中,缝合桥修复比软骨翼修复具有更高的固定刚度和耐久性。临床意义本研究试图寻找生物力学性能优越的儿童软骨剪切损伤构建体。