Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser and Photochemical Functionalization of Polyetheretherketone Post Surface: Comparative Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation Using Total-Etch and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.

IF 1.8 Q2 SURGERY
Saleh Ali Alqahtani
{"title":"Erbium-Doped Yttrium Aluminum Garnet Laser and Photochemical Functionalization of Polyetheretherketone Post Surface: Comparative Push-Out Bond Strength Evaluation Using Total-Etch and Self-Adhesive Resin Cements.","authors":"Saleh Ali Alqahtani","doi":"10.1177/25785478261442478","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>Evaluating the effect of surface conditioning protocols-sulfuric acid (SA), Er: YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser, and Rose Bengal-activated photochemical functionalization (RB-PCF)-on the surface roughness (R<sub>a</sub>) and push-out bond strength (PBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) posts bonded to canal dentin using total-etch conventional resin cement (TE-CRC) and self-adhesive resin cement (SARC).</p><p><strong>Material and method: </strong>Briefly, 60 extracted, caries-free human maxillary canines were decoronated to 15 mm root length. Endodontic therapy was performed using the ProTaper Next system, followed by obturation. Post space preparation was carried out with Peeso reamers. Briefly, 90 PEEK posts were allocated into 3 groups (<i>n</i> = 30) based on the surface conditioning methods. Group 1: SA, Group 2: Er: YAG laser, Group 3: RB-PCF. R<sub>a</sub> was assessed using a profilometer, and surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The remaining 20 posts were subdivided based on the cement type used for bonding to canal dentin: TE-CRC and SARC (<i>n</i> = 10 each). Specimens were sectioned into cervical, middle, and apical thirds and tested for PBS, after which failure modes were examined. Data analysis was performed using analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey (<i>p</i> < 0.05).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Group 1 (SA) showed the highest R<sub>a</sub> (1.32 ± 0.32 µm), while Group 3 (RB-PCF) exhibited the lowest R<sub>a</sub> (0.56 ± 0.21 µm). The highest PBS was observed in the cervical third of Group 1A (SA + TE-CRC), whereas the lowest occurred in the apical third of Group 3A (RB-PCF + TE-CRC).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Er: YAG laser conditioning appears to be a viable alternative to SA for surface pretreatment of PEEK posts. Self etch resin cement showed improved performance compared with TE-CRC.</p>","PeriodicalId":94169,"journal":{"name":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","volume":" ","pages":"378-386"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Photobiomodulation, photomedicine, and laser surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25785478261442478","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Evaluating the effect of surface conditioning protocols-sulfuric acid (SA), Er: YAG (erbium-doped yttrium aluminum garnet) laser, and Rose Bengal-activated photochemical functionalization (RB-PCF)-on the surface roughness (Ra) and push-out bond strength (PBS) of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) posts bonded to canal dentin using total-etch conventional resin cement (TE-CRC) and self-adhesive resin cement (SARC).

Material and method: Briefly, 60 extracted, caries-free human maxillary canines were decoronated to 15 mm root length. Endodontic therapy was performed using the ProTaper Next system, followed by obturation. Post space preparation was carried out with Peeso reamers. Briefly, 90 PEEK posts were allocated into 3 groups (n = 30) based on the surface conditioning methods. Group 1: SA, Group 2: Er: YAG laser, Group 3: RB-PCF. Ra was assessed using a profilometer, and surface topography was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. The remaining 20 posts were subdivided based on the cement type used for bonding to canal dentin: TE-CRC and SARC (n = 10 each). Specimens were sectioned into cervical, middle, and apical thirds and tested for PBS, after which failure modes were examined. Data analysis was performed using analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey (p < 0.05).

Results: Group 1 (SA) showed the highest Ra (1.32 ± 0.32 µm), while Group 3 (RB-PCF) exhibited the lowest Ra (0.56 ± 0.21 µm). The highest PBS was observed in the cervical third of Group 1A (SA + TE-CRC), whereas the lowest occurred in the apical third of Group 3A (RB-PCF + TE-CRC).

Conclusion: Er: YAG laser conditioning appears to be a viable alternative to SA for surface pretreatment of PEEK posts. Self etch resin cement showed improved performance compared with TE-CRC.

掺铒钇铝石榴石激光和聚醚醚酮柱表面光化学功能化:用全蚀刻和自粘树脂水泥比较推出键强度评价。
目的:评价硫酸(SA)、Er: YAG(铒掺杂钇铝石榴石)激光和玫瑰红活化光化学官能化(RB-PCF)三种表面处理方案对全蚀刻常规树脂水泥(TE-CRC)和自粘树脂水泥(SARC)与根管牙本质结合的聚醚醚酮(PEEK)桩表面粗糙度(Ra)和外展粘结强度(PBS)的影响。材料和方法:简单地说,提取60颗无龋的人上颌犬,装饰至根长15mm。使用ProTaper Next系统进行牙髓治疗,随后进行封闭。用Peeso铰刀进行了桩位准备。简单地说,根据表面处理方法将90个PEEK桩分为3组(n = 30)。组1:SA,组2:Er: YAG激光器,组3:RB-PCF。使用轮廓仪评估Ra,并通过扫描电子显微镜评估表面形貌。剩余的20个桩根据粘接根管牙本质的水泥类型细分为TE-CRC和SARC(各10个)。将标本切成颈部、中部和根尖三分之一,并进行PBS测试,之后检查失效模式。数据分析采用方差分析和事后分析(p < 0.05)。结果:组1 (SA) Ra最高(1.32±0.32µm),组3 (RB-PCF) Ra最低(0.56±0.21µm)。PBS在1A组(SA + TE-CRC)中最高,而在3A组(RB-PCF + TE-CRC)中最低。结论:Er: YAG激光预处理是一种可行的替代SA的PEEK桩表面预处理方法。与TE-CRC相比,自蚀刻树脂水泥的性能有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Photobiomodulation, Photomedicine, and Laser Surgery Editor-in-Chief: Michael R Hamblin, PhD Co-Editor-in-Chief: Heidi Abrahamse, PhD
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书