[Informed decisions, optimized consent : navigating medical information in the era of medicine 2.0].

Revue medicale de Liege Pub Date : 2026-04-01
Justine Gudelj, Anne-Sophie Wery, Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, Olivier Wery
{"title":"[Informed decisions, optimized consent : navigating medical information in the era of medicine 2.0].","authors":"Justine Gudelj, Anne-Sophie Wery, Jérôme Schoenmaeckers, Olivier Wery","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Among the precepts of medical ethics, the duty to inform holds fundamental importance. The obligation to obtain informed consent before any surgical or medical intervention has evolved progressively over the last decades, in parallel with advances in medical practice. The abundance of medical information accessible online, often unverified, influences patients' perception and understanding. While this access to knowledge empowers individuals, it also complicates the transmission of clear and reliable medical information. Physicians now face patients who are exposed to various, sometimes erroneous, sources, while still confronting traditional challenges such as linguistic and cultural barriers, as well as time constraints due to substantial workloads. The central ethical challenge for practitioners is to develop strategies that navigate these multiple information sources, ensuring that patients have the necessary elements to make fully informed decisions. This requires ensuring the reliability of the information provided and fostering an open and critical dialogue to obtain valid and informed consent.</p>","PeriodicalId":94201,"journal":{"name":"Revue medicale de Liege","volume":"81 4","pages":"225-230"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revue medicale de Liege","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Among the precepts of medical ethics, the duty to inform holds fundamental importance. The obligation to obtain informed consent before any surgical or medical intervention has evolved progressively over the last decades, in parallel with advances in medical practice. The abundance of medical information accessible online, often unverified, influences patients' perception and understanding. While this access to knowledge empowers individuals, it also complicates the transmission of clear and reliable medical information. Physicians now face patients who are exposed to various, sometimes erroneous, sources, while still confronting traditional challenges such as linguistic and cultural barriers, as well as time constraints due to substantial workloads. The central ethical challenge for practitioners is to develop strategies that navigate these multiple information sources, ensuring that patients have the necessary elements to make fully informed decisions. This requires ensuring the reliability of the information provided and fostering an open and critical dialogue to obtain valid and informed consent.

[知情决策,优化同意:医学2.0时代的医疗信息导航]。
在医德戒律中,告知义务具有根本的重要性。在过去几十年中,随着医疗实践的进步,在进行任何手术或医疗干预之前获得知情同意的义务已逐步演变。网上可获得的大量医疗信息往往未经证实,影响了患者的感知和理解。虽然这种获取知识的途径增强了个人的能力,但也使清晰可靠的医疗信息的传递变得复杂。医生现在面对的病人接触到各种各样的信息来源,有时是错误的,同时仍然面临着传统的挑战,如语言和文化障碍,以及由于工作量大而造成的时间限制。从业人员面临的核心伦理挑战是制定策略,驾驭这些多种信息来源,确保患者有必要的因素做出充分知情的决定。这需要确保所提供信息的可靠性,并促进公开和关键的对话,以获得有效和知情的同意。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书