Risks of uterus transplantation: a scoping review.

IF 1.4
Sibele Maria Schuantes-Paim, Dani Ejzenberg, Beatriz Souza Braga Mergulhão, Gabriela Mininel de Medeiros, Anne Caroline Neves Geraldo, Vinícius Temóteo Ferrari, Bartira de Aguiar Roza, Janine Schirmer
{"title":"Risks of uterus transplantation: a scoping review.","authors":"Sibele Maria Schuantes-Paim, Dani Ejzenberg, Beatriz Souza Braga Mergulhão, Gabriela Mininel de Medeiros, Anne Caroline Neves Geraldo, Vinícius Temóteo Ferrari, Bartira de Aguiar Roza, Janine Schirmer","doi":"10.61622/rbgo/2026rbgo14","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To map risks related to uterus transplantation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Were included studies published in scientific journals that described complications, adverse events, and risks in women who were uterine transplant recipients, living uterine donors, and newborns, infants and children born from transplanted uteri. A modified version of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis was used for data collection, and the data were quantitatively analyzed through the development of risk categories and risks rates calculation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total 44 studies from 13 countries were included. Mapped 115 patients, 62 recipients, 34 donors, and 19 newborns, infants, and children born from transplanted uteri, 324 complications and adverse events across 25 risk categories. An online system (UTx Observatory) was developed. Among recipients, 77.5% received uteri from living donors, and 22.5% from deceased donors with most prevalent immunological, vascular, infectious, and prematurity risks. Recipients of deceased donor uteri had a higher adjusted risk rate. Among living donors, most prevalent risks were neurological, infectious, and urological risks. Laparotomy (76.5%) was associated with a higher adjusted risk rate than robotic-assisted surgery (23.5%) for uterus donation. Mainly risks mapped from newborns, infants, and children were respiratory, development-related, and malformations.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study and the UTx Observatory provide a foundation for developing targeted risk-mitigation strategies, shaping future studies and interventions, and informing health teams, authorities, and patients involved in uterus transplantation.Open Science Framework (OSF): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/524UT.</p>","PeriodicalId":74699,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","volume":"48 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078511/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.61622/rbgo/2026rbgo14","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To map risks related to uterus transplantation.

Methods: Scoping review based on the Joanna Briggs Institute method. Were included studies published in scientific journals that described complications, adverse events, and risks in women who were uterine transplant recipients, living uterine donors, and newborns, infants and children born from transplanted uteri. A modified version of Failure Modes and Effects Analysis was used for data collection, and the data were quantitatively analyzed through the development of risk categories and risks rates calculation.

Results: In total 44 studies from 13 countries were included. Mapped 115 patients, 62 recipients, 34 donors, and 19 newborns, infants, and children born from transplanted uteri, 324 complications and adverse events across 25 risk categories. An online system (UTx Observatory) was developed. Among recipients, 77.5% received uteri from living donors, and 22.5% from deceased donors with most prevalent immunological, vascular, infectious, and prematurity risks. Recipients of deceased donor uteri had a higher adjusted risk rate. Among living donors, most prevalent risks were neurological, infectious, and urological risks. Laparotomy (76.5%) was associated with a higher adjusted risk rate than robotic-assisted surgery (23.5%) for uterus donation. Mainly risks mapped from newborns, infants, and children were respiratory, development-related, and malformations.

Conclusion: The study and the UTx Observatory provide a foundation for developing targeted risk-mitigation strategies, shaping future studies and interventions, and informing health teams, authorities, and patients involved in uterus transplantation.Open Science Framework (OSF): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/524UT.

子宫移植的风险:范围综述。
目的:了解子宫移植的相关危险因素。方法:根据Joanna Briggs研究所的方法进行范围审查。我们纳入了发表在科学期刊上的研究,这些研究描述了子宫移植受者、活体子宫供者、新生儿、婴儿和子宫移植后出生的儿童的并发症、不良事件和风险。采用修正版的《失效模式与效应分析》进行数据收集,并通过制定风险类别和计算风险率对数据进行定量分析。结果:共纳入来自13个国家的44项研究。绘制了115名患者、62名受体、34名供体和19名新生儿、婴儿和从移植子宫出生的儿童、25个风险类别的324例并发症和不良事件。开发了一个在线系统(UTx天文台)。在受者中,77.5%的人接受的子宫来自活体供体,22.5%的人接受的子宫来自具有最普遍的免疫、血管、感染和早产风险的已故供体。接受已故捐赠者子宫的人调整后的风险率更高。在活体捐赠者中,最普遍的风险是神经系统、感染和泌尿系统风险。剖腹手术(76.5%)与机器人辅助手术(23.5%)相比,子宫捐赠的调整风险率更高。从新生儿、婴儿和儿童绘制的主要风险是呼吸、发育相关和畸形。结论:该研究和UTx观察站为制定有针对性的风险缓解策略、塑造未来的研究和干预措施、告知卫生团队、当局和涉及子宫移植的患者提供了基础。开放科学框架(OSF): https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/524UT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书