Frequency and severity of systemic reactions during beta-lactam skin testing in adults with immediate hypersensitivity allergy.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 ALLERGY
Patricia Letón-Cabanillas, Blanca Noguerado-Mellado, Patricia Quijada-Morales, Gema Salas-Parra, Patricia Rojas-Pérez-Ezquerra
{"title":"Frequency and severity of systemic reactions during beta-lactam skin testing in adults with immediate hypersensitivity allergy.","authors":"Patricia Letón-Cabanillas, Blanca Noguerado-Mellado, Patricia Quijada-Morales, Gema Salas-Parra, Patricia Rojas-Pérez-Ezquerra","doi":"10.1186/s13223-026-01032-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Hypersensitivity to beta-lactams (BL) is the most frequent drug allergy, and skin testing (ST) remains the first-line diagnostic tool. Although generally safe, systemic reactions (SR) during ST are a concern. We conducted a 7-year ambispective study (2018-2025) including 216 adults with confirmed immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to BL, established by positive skin tests (ST) or drug challenge tests (DCT). Among them, 138 (63.9%) had positive ST, predominantly intradermal tests (IDT; 93.5%). Five patients (3.6% of ST-positive; 2.3% of the entire cohort) developed SR during ST, all after IDT following negative skin prick tests (SPT). Reactions were mostly mild (urticaria, generalized pruritus, erythema), although one anaphylaxis occurred. All were rapidly controlled with symptomatic treatment. Surprisingly, all patients with SR had urticaria-angioedema as their index reaction; none had experienced prior anaphylaxis. A significant shorter time interval between the index reaction and allergy evaluation was observed in SR patients (mean 23.6 vs. 48.8 months, p = 0.02). No significant associations were identified for age, sex, culprit BL, or specific IgE. SR during BL ST are infrequent but clinically relevant. SPT appears highly safe, whereas IDT requires particular caution, especially when performed shortly after the index reaction.</p>","PeriodicalId":51302,"journal":{"name":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13214350/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Allergy Asthma and Clinical Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13223-026-01032-2","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ALLERGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Hypersensitivity to beta-lactams (BL) is the most frequent drug allergy, and skin testing (ST) remains the first-line diagnostic tool. Although generally safe, systemic reactions (SR) during ST are a concern. We conducted a 7-year ambispective study (2018-2025) including 216 adults with confirmed immediate hypersensitivity reactions (HSR) to BL, established by positive skin tests (ST) or drug challenge tests (DCT). Among them, 138 (63.9%) had positive ST, predominantly intradermal tests (IDT; 93.5%). Five patients (3.6% of ST-positive; 2.3% of the entire cohort) developed SR during ST, all after IDT following negative skin prick tests (SPT). Reactions were mostly mild (urticaria, generalized pruritus, erythema), although one anaphylaxis occurred. All were rapidly controlled with symptomatic treatment. Surprisingly, all patients with SR had urticaria-angioedema as their index reaction; none had experienced prior anaphylaxis. A significant shorter time interval between the index reaction and allergy evaluation was observed in SR patients (mean 23.6 vs. 48.8 months, p = 0.02). No significant associations were identified for age, sex, culprit BL, or specific IgE. SR during BL ST are infrequent but clinically relevant. SPT appears highly safe, whereas IDT requires particular caution, especially when performed shortly after the index reaction.

急性超敏性过敏成人β -内酰胺皮肤试验期间全身反应的频率和严重程度。
对β -内酰胺过敏(BL)是最常见的药物过敏,皮肤试验(ST)仍然是一线诊断工具。虽然总体上是安全的,但ST期间的全身反应(SR)是一个值得关注的问题。我们进行了一项为期7年的双侧研究(2018-2025),包括216名经皮肤试验(ST)或药物激发试验(DCT)阳性证实对BL有立即超敏反应(HSR)的成年人。其中ST阳性138例(63.9%),以皮内试验为主(IDT, 93.5%)。5名患者(3.6% ST阳性,2.3%整个队列)在ST期间发生SR,均在皮肤点刺试验(SPT)阴性后的IDT后发生。反应大多是轻微的(荨麻疹,全身瘙痒,红斑),尽管发生了一次过敏反应。所有病例均经对症治疗后迅速得到控制。令人惊讶的是,所有SR患者的主要反应都是荨麻疹-血管性水肿;既往均无过敏反应。SR患者的指数反应与过敏评价之间的时间间隔显著缩短(平均23.6个月对48.8个月,p = 0.02)。未发现年龄、性别、罪魁祸首BL或特异性IgE有显著相关性。BL - ST期间的SR不常见,但有临床意义。SPT似乎非常安全,而IDT需要特别小心,特别是在指数反应后不久进行时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
3.70%
发文量
96
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology (AACI), the official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (CSACI), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and treatment of allergic and immunologic disease. By offering a high-visibility forum for new insights and discussions, AACI provides a platform for the dissemination of allergy and clinical immunology research and reviews amongst allergists, pulmonologists, immunologists and other physicians, healthcare workers, medical students and the public worldwide. AACI reports on basic research and clinically applied studies in the following areas and other related topics: asthma and occupational lung disease, rhinoconjunctivitis and rhinosinusitis, drug hypersensitivity, allergic skin diseases, urticaria and angioedema, venom hypersensitivity, anaphylaxis and food allergy, immunotherapy, immune modulators and biologics, immune deficiency and autoimmunity, T cell and B cell functions, regulatory T cells, natural killer cells, mast cell and eosinophil functions, complement abnormalities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书