Risk Factors Associated With Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus Infections in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Tehran.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q3 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Haniyeh Khalili, Mona Mahrooghi, Shahin Najar-Peerayeh, Shabnam Zeighamy Alamdary, Hossein Najd Sepas, Bita Bakhshi
{"title":"Risk Factors Associated With Methicillin-Resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> Infections in Patients With Diabetic Foot Ulcers in Tehran.","authors":"Haniyeh Khalili, Mona Mahrooghi, Shahin Najar-Peerayeh, Shabnam Zeighamy Alamdary, Hossein Najd Sepas, Bita Bakhshi","doi":"10.1155/cjid/5695498","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Foot ulcer is a common complication of diabetes mellitus, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates among diabetic patients. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> (<i>S. aureus</i>) (MRSA) infections and their epidemiology among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 211 wound samples were collected from patients with DFUs in five educational hospitals in Tehran during 2017-2019. The presence of certain virulence markers (α-haemolysin (<i>hlα</i>), phenol-soluble modulins (<i>psmα</i>), accessory gene regulator (<i>agr</i>), exfoliative toxin A, B (<i>eta etb</i>) and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (<i>tsst-1</i>)) was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and a multiplex PCR assay was used to screen for staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCC<i>mec</i>) types. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A significant proportion of patients with DFUs had Type 2 diabetes. Grading of DFUs revealed that Grade 4 was the most common grade among patients. The majority of patients were infected with <i>S. aureus</i> (45.3%) and <i>Escherichia coli</i> (<i>E. coli</i>) (29.4%). A total of 59 <i>S. aureus</i> isolates were identified, of which 37 (62.7%) were MRSA, and 22 (37.2%) were methicillin-susceptible <i>S. aureus</i> (MSSA). MRSA isolates were mostly positive for the <i>hlα</i> (57.6%) and <i>psmα</i> (50.8%) genes. The <i>tsst-</i>1 gene was detected in 8.5% of MRSA strains, while the <i>eta</i> (3.4%) and <i>etb</i> (5.1%) genes had the lowest prevalence in MRSA isolates. According to the results, SCC<i>mec</i> Type III (48.6%) was the most common subtype among MRSA isolates, followed by SCC<i>mec</i> II (16.2%). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results revealed that linezolid (66.1%), gentamycin (66.1%) and mupirocin (62.7%) were the most effective antibiotics against MRSA isolates, respectively. In contrast, MRSA strains showed the highest resistance to cefoxitin and penicillin. Finally, the risk factors in patients with DFU in this study were diastolic hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, renal failure, neuropathy disease and hospitalization history.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The findings underscore the critical importance of a comprehensive understanding of patients' medical records and underlying conditions. In addition, accurate assessment of microbial prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility is essential for the effective management of DFUs.</p>","PeriodicalId":50715,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","volume":"2026 ","pages":"5695498"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071331/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases & Medical Microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/cjid/5695498","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Foot ulcer is a common complication of diabetes mellitus, which is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates among diabetic patients. This study aimed to identify risk factors associated with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) (MRSA) infections and their epidemiology among patients with diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs).

Methods: A total of 211 wound samples were collected from patients with DFUs in five educational hospitals in Tehran during 2017-2019. The presence of certain virulence markers (α-haemolysin (hlα), phenol-soluble modulins (psmα), accessory gene regulator (agr), exfoliative toxin A, B (eta etb) and toxic shock syndrome toxin-1 (tsst-1)) was investigated by polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and a multiplex PCR assay was used to screen for staphylococcal cassette chromosome (SCCmec) types. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was performed by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method.

Results: A significant proportion of patients with DFUs had Type 2 diabetes. Grading of DFUs revealed that Grade 4 was the most common grade among patients. The majority of patients were infected with S. aureus (45.3%) and Escherichia coli (E. coli) (29.4%). A total of 59 S. aureus isolates were identified, of which 37 (62.7%) were MRSA, and 22 (37.2%) were methicillin-susceptible S. aureus (MSSA). MRSA isolates were mostly positive for the hlα (57.6%) and psmα (50.8%) genes. The tsst-1 gene was detected in 8.5% of MRSA strains, while the eta (3.4%) and etb (5.1%) genes had the lowest prevalence in MRSA isolates. According to the results, SCCmec Type III (48.6%) was the most common subtype among MRSA isolates, followed by SCCmec II (16.2%). The antimicrobial susceptibility testing results revealed that linezolid (66.1%), gentamycin (66.1%) and mupirocin (62.7%) were the most effective antibiotics against MRSA isolates, respectively. In contrast, MRSA strains showed the highest resistance to cefoxitin and penicillin. Finally, the risk factors in patients with DFU in this study were diastolic hypertension, cardiovascular diseases, renal failure, neuropathy disease and hospitalization history.

Conclusions: The findings underscore the critical importance of a comprehensive understanding of patients' medical records and underlying conditions. In addition, accurate assessment of microbial prevalence and antibiotic susceptibility is essential for the effective management of DFUs.

德黑兰糖尿病足溃疡患者耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌感染的相关危险因素
背景:足部溃疡是糖尿病的常见并发症,在糖尿病患者中具有较高的发病率和死亡率。本研究旨在确定糖尿病足溃疡(DFUs)患者中耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(金黄色葡萄球菌)(MRSA)感染的相关危险因素及其流行病学。方法:收集德黑兰5家教育医院2017-2019年dfu患者的211份伤口样本。采用聚合酶链式反应(PCR)检测葡萄球菌的毒力标记(α-溶血素(hlα)、酚溶性调质素(psmα)、辅助基因调节因子(agr)、剥脱毒素A、B (eta乙)和中毒性休克综合征毒素-1 (tsst-1))的存在,并采用多重PCR技术筛选葡萄球菌盒染色体(SCCmec)类型。采用Kirby-Bauer纸片扩散法进行药敏试验(AST)。结果:DFUs患者有2型糖尿病的显著比例。DFUs的分级显示,4级是患者中最常见的级别。以金黄色葡萄球菌(45.3%)和大肠杆菌(29.4%)感染最多。共检出59株金黄色葡萄球菌,其中MRSA 37株(62.7%),甲氧西林敏感金黄色葡萄球菌(MSSA) 22株(37.2%)。MRSA分离株hlα(57.6%)和psmα(50.8%)基因阳性。tsst-1基因在MRSA菌株中检出率为8.5%,而eta(3.4%)和etb(5.1%)基因在MRSA菌株中检出率最低。结果显示,SCCmecⅲ型(48.6%)是MRSA分离株中最常见的亚型,其次是SCCmec II型(16.2%)。药敏试验结果显示,利奈唑胺(66.1%)、庆大霉素(66.1%)和莫匹罗星(62.7%)分别是对MRSA分离株最有效的抗生素。相比之下,MRSA菌株对头孢西丁和青霉素的耐药性最高。最后,本研究DFU患者的危险因素为舒张期高血压、心血管疾病、肾功能衰竭、神经病变疾病和住院史。结论:研究结果强调了全面了解患者医疗记录和潜在疾病的重要性。此外,准确评估微生物流行率和抗生素敏感性对于有效管理DFUs至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
108
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases and Medical Microbiology is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes original research articles, review articles, and clinical studies related to infectious diseases of bacterial, viral and parasitic origin. The journal welcomes articles describing research on pathogenesis, epidemiology of infection, diagnosis and treatment, antibiotics and resistance, and immunology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书