{"title":"Total Aortic Arch Replacement With the Frozen Elephant Trunk Technique: Influence of Aortic Arch Anomalies.","authors":"Alessandro Leone, Silvia Snaidero, Luca Di Marco, Chiara Nocera, Davide Pacini","doi":"10.1093/icvts/ivag100","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess surgical challenges and outcomes associated with arch anomalies in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk (FET) for acute and chronic dissections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>From January 2007 to January 2024, 401 patients underwent FET procedure in our centre. We included 285 patients with acute type A/B, chronic type A/B, and residual dissection. Patients were divided into normal arch group (n = 216) and arch anomalies group (n = 69), including aberrant right subclavian artery, bovine trunk, arch vertebral artery, and gothic arch.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Overall in-hospital mortality was 15.4% (17.4% in arch anomalies vs 14.8% in arch normal). In-hospital thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) occurred in 7.2% (n = 5) of patients with arch anomalies. Stent graft-induced new entry tear at follow-up was 26.1% in arch anomalies vs 17.1% in arch normal group. Long-term survival in the overall patients was not different between the 2 groups (P = .383). In the subgroup of patients treated for chronic aortic dissection, freedom from TEVAR was higher in those with normal arch anatomy (P = .026).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Aortic arch anomalies, especially in chronic dissection, were associated with increased endovascular reintervention. The gothic arch is the most challenging configuration due to frequent stent kinking.</p>","PeriodicalId":73406,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13152671/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icvts/ivag100","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: To assess surgical challenges and outcomes associated with arch anomalies in patients undergoing frozen elephant trunk (FET) for acute and chronic dissections.
Methods: From January 2007 to January 2024, 401 patients underwent FET procedure in our centre. We included 285 patients with acute type A/B, chronic type A/B, and residual dissection. Patients were divided into normal arch group (n = 216) and arch anomalies group (n = 69), including aberrant right subclavian artery, bovine trunk, arch vertebral artery, and gothic arch.
Results: Overall in-hospital mortality was 15.4% (17.4% in arch anomalies vs 14.8% in arch normal). In-hospital thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) occurred in 7.2% (n = 5) of patients with arch anomalies. Stent graft-induced new entry tear at follow-up was 26.1% in arch anomalies vs 17.1% in arch normal group. Long-term survival in the overall patients was not different between the 2 groups (P = .383). In the subgroup of patients treated for chronic aortic dissection, freedom from TEVAR was higher in those with normal arch anatomy (P = .026).
Conclusions: Aortic arch anomalies, especially in chronic dissection, were associated with increased endovascular reintervention. The gothic arch is the most challenging configuration due to frequent stent kinking.