Social exclusion enhances the processing of emotional crowd faces: Evidence from ERPs.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Peiyao Geng, Ping Li, Nan Zhang, Wenbo Luo, Weiqi He
{"title":"Social exclusion enhances the processing of emotional crowd faces: Evidence from ERPs.","authors":"Peiyao Geng, Ping Li, Nan Zhang, Wenbo Luo, Weiqi He","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01441-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Social exclusion, a negative emotional experience triggered by interpersonal rejection, has detrimental effects on both social interactions and mental health. While our previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study provided causal evidence indicating that social exclusion significantly impacts the perception of crowd facial expressions, the neural correlates underlying this effect across distinct event-related potential (ERP) components remain poorly understood. To address this issue, the present study used ERPs to extend our neurophysiological insights into this phenomenon. Participants' brain activity was recorded while they performed an emotion discrimination task, viewing happy or disgust crowd faces (Experiment 1) or single faces (Experiment 2) following experiences of social inclusion or exclusion through a Cyberball game. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that social exclusion enhanced neural responses to both happy and disgust crowd faces, evidenced by larger mean amplitudes of the N170 and late positive potential (LPP) components. This neural enhancement was also correlated with greater need threat, as higher levels of need threat were associated with larger neural responses to emotional crowd faces. In contrast, Experiment 2 found no exclusion-related neural effects when participants viewed single faces. These neural results may reconcile the social reconnection hypothesis with the rejection sensitivity model by demonstrating that social exclusion increases responsiveness to socially affective information extracted from groups. In everyday social interactions, this increased responsiveness could influence how people read and evaluate emotional signals in crowds, ultimately affecting social judgment and adaptive behavior.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":"1851-1866"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01441-1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social exclusion, a negative emotional experience triggered by interpersonal rejection, has detrimental effects on both social interactions and mental health. While our previous transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) study provided causal evidence indicating that social exclusion significantly impacts the perception of crowd facial expressions, the neural correlates underlying this effect across distinct event-related potential (ERP) components remain poorly understood. To address this issue, the present study used ERPs to extend our neurophysiological insights into this phenomenon. Participants' brain activity was recorded while they performed an emotion discrimination task, viewing happy or disgust crowd faces (Experiment 1) or single faces (Experiment 2) following experiences of social inclusion or exclusion through a Cyberball game. Results from Experiment 1 indicated that social exclusion enhanced neural responses to both happy and disgust crowd faces, evidenced by larger mean amplitudes of the N170 and late positive potential (LPP) components. This neural enhancement was also correlated with greater need threat, as higher levels of need threat were associated with larger neural responses to emotional crowd faces. In contrast, Experiment 2 found no exclusion-related neural effects when participants viewed single faces. These neural results may reconcile the social reconnection hypothesis with the rejection sensitivity model by demonstrating that social exclusion increases responsiveness to socially affective information extracted from groups. In everyday social interactions, this increased responsiveness could influence how people read and evaluate emotional signals in crowds, ultimately affecting social judgment and adaptive behavior.

社会排斥增强了情绪人群面孔的加工:来自erp的证据。
社会排斥是一种由人际排斥引发的消极情绪体验,对社会交往和心理健康都有不利影响。虽然我们之前的经颅磁刺激(TMS)研究提供了因果证据,表明社会排斥显著影响人群面部表情的感知,但这种影响背后的神经关联在不同的事件相关电位(ERP)成分中仍然知之甚少。为了解决这个问题,本研究使用erp来扩展我们对这一现象的神经生理学见解。研究人员记录了参与者在进行情绪辨别任务时的大脑活动,即在通过网络球游戏体验社会包容或排斥之后,观察快乐或厌恶人群的面孔(实验1)或单一面孔(实验2)。实验1的结果表明,社会排斥增强了被试对快乐和厌恶人群面孔的神经反应,表现为N170和后期正电位(LPP)分量的平均振幅较大。这种神经增强也与更大的需求威胁相关,因为更高水平的需求威胁与更大的神经反应有关。相比之下,实验2发现当参与者观看单张脸时,没有与排他相关的神经效应。这些神经学结果表明,社会排斥增加了对群体中提取的社会情感信息的反应性,从而使社会重新连接假说与拒绝敏感性模型相一致。在日常的社会交往中,这种增加的反应能力可能会影响人们在人群中阅读和评估情绪信号的方式,最终影响社会判断和适应行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
3.40%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书