{"title":"Intuition criticizes self, analysis protects mother: evidence from an ERPs study.","authors":"Fan He, Yangzhuo Li, Yao Wang, Junlong Luo","doi":"10.3758/s13415-026-01426-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In collectivistic cultures, individuals' self-concept is deeply intertwined with perceptions of their mother. However, evaluation biases towards both the self and the mother, as well as the underlying cognitive mechanisms, remain unclear. This study explored self-mother evaluation biases under intuitive processing, extending prior research on analytical processing. Using the Remember/Know self-reference paradigm and event-related potentials (ERPs) technology, we manipulated response time and cognitive load to dissociate intuitive from analytical processing. Results showed that, under analytical processing conditions, maternal negative trait words elicited a stronger N400 component, indicating a positive bias in the evaluation of mothers, while self-negative trait words evoked a stronger LPP component, reflecting a negative processing bias toward self-related traits. Under intuitive processing conditions, individuals showed no evaluative bias toward their mothers, whereas self-positive trait words triggered enhanced N200 and N400 components, demonstrating a negative bias in self-evaluation. The modesty effect may explain the negative bias in self-evaluation during intuitive processing. The tendency to defend mothers' evaluations may be attributable to the emotional bond formed through long-term maternal parenting in collectivistic cultures.</p>","PeriodicalId":50672,"journal":{"name":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-026-01426-0","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In collectivistic cultures, individuals' self-concept is deeply intertwined with perceptions of their mother. However, evaluation biases towards both the self and the mother, as well as the underlying cognitive mechanisms, remain unclear. This study explored self-mother evaluation biases under intuitive processing, extending prior research on analytical processing. Using the Remember/Know self-reference paradigm and event-related potentials (ERPs) technology, we manipulated response time and cognitive load to dissociate intuitive from analytical processing. Results showed that, under analytical processing conditions, maternal negative trait words elicited a stronger N400 component, indicating a positive bias in the evaluation of mothers, while self-negative trait words evoked a stronger LPP component, reflecting a negative processing bias toward self-related traits. Under intuitive processing conditions, individuals showed no evaluative bias toward their mothers, whereas self-positive trait words triggered enhanced N200 and N400 components, demonstrating a negative bias in self-evaluation. The modesty effect may explain the negative bias in self-evaluation during intuitive processing. The tendency to defend mothers' evaluations may be attributable to the emotional bond formed through long-term maternal parenting in collectivistic cultures.
期刊介绍:
Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience (CABN) offers theoretical, review, and primary research articles on behavior and brain processes in humans. Coverage includes normal function as well as patients with injuries or processes that influence brain function: neurological disorders, including both healthy and disordered aging; and psychiatric disorders such as schizophrenia and depression. CABN is the leading vehicle for strongly psychologically motivated studies of brain–behavior relationships, through the presentation of papers that integrate psychological theory and the conduct and interpretation of the neuroscientific data. The range of topics includes perception, attention, memory, language, problem solving, reasoning, and decision-making; emotional processes, motivation, reward prediction, and affective states; and individual differences in relevant domains, including personality. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience is a publication of the Psychonomic Society.