Evaluating core surgical training selection: Associations between the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA), interview performance and offer outcomes in the 2025 UK national cohort.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
J K Seehra, R Ellis, B Doleman, E McLarty, J N Lund
{"title":"Evaluating core surgical training selection: Associations between the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA), interview performance and offer outcomes in the 2025 UK national cohort.","authors":"J K Seehra, R Ellis, B Doleman, E McLarty, J N Lund","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2026.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) is a national aptitude test increasingly incorporated into selection for Core Surgical Training (CST) in the United Kingdom. Although intended to enhance objectivity and equity, its relationship with subsequent interview performance and final CST offer outcomes remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study analysed anonymised data from the 2025 UK CST national selection process. Applicants who completed both the MSRA and structured interview were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models examined associations between applicant characteristics (including demographic factors and requests for interview adjustments) and performance across three stages: MSRA, interview, and CST offer outcome. Results are presented as adjusted regression coefficients (β) or adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1154 applicants, 1045 had complete data. Female applicants scored higher on the MSRA (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25) and interview (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.30) than males. Higher MSRA performance was associated with higher interview scores (β = 0.22 per 1 SD, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and greater odds of receiving a CST offer (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.94). Non-UK graduates demonstrated lower MSRA and interview scores and consequently had lower odds of receiving a CST offer. Applicants requesting interview adjustments also had lower odds of an offer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSRA performance was positively associated with interview and offer outcomes, supporting its role as an objective component of CST selection. Continued monitoring across recruitment cycles is required to ensure the process remains equitable, transparent, and aligned with surgical training needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2026.03.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) is a national aptitude test increasingly incorporated into selection for Core Surgical Training (CST) in the United Kingdom. Although intended to enhance objectivity and equity, its relationship with subsequent interview performance and final CST offer outcomes remains unexplored.

Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analysed anonymised data from the 2025 UK CST national selection process. Applicants who completed both the MSRA and structured interview were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models examined associations between applicant characteristics (including demographic factors and requests for interview adjustments) and performance across three stages: MSRA, interview, and CST offer outcome. Results are presented as adjusted regression coefficients (β) or adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).

Results: Of 1154 applicants, 1045 had complete data. Female applicants scored higher on the MSRA (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25) and interview (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.30) than males. Higher MSRA performance was associated with higher interview scores (β = 0.22 per 1 SD, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and greater odds of receiving a CST offer (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.94). Non-UK graduates demonstrated lower MSRA and interview scores and consequently had lower odds of receiving a CST offer. Applicants requesting interview adjustments also had lower odds of an offer.

Conclusion: MSRA performance was positively associated with interview and offer outcomes, supporting its role as an objective component of CST selection. Continued monitoring across recruitment cycles is required to ensure the process remains equitable, transparent, and aligned with surgical training needs.

评估核心外科培训选择:在2025年英国国家队列中,多专业招聘评估(MSRA)、面试表现和提供结果之间的关系。
背景:在英国,多专业招聘评估(MSRA)是一项全国性的能力倾向测试,越来越多地纳入核心外科培训(CST)的选择。虽然旨在提高客观性和公平性,但其与后续访谈绩效和最终CST报价结果的关系仍未得到探讨。方法:回顾性横断面研究分析了2025年英国CST国家选拔过程中的匿名数据。同时完成MSRA和结构化面试的申请人被纳入。多变量线性和逻辑回归模型检验了申请人特征(包括人口统计学因素和面试调整请求)与三个阶段的表现之间的关系:MSRA、面试和CST offer结果。结果以校正回归系数(β)或校正优势比(aOR)表示,95%置信区间(CI)。结果:1154名申请者中,1045名资料完整。女性申请者在MSRA (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01至0.25)和面试(β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05至0.30)上的得分高于男性。更高的MSRA表现与更高的面试分数(β = 0.22 / 1 SD, 95% CI 0.12至0.32)和更高的获得CST offer的几率相关(aOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.05至1.94)。非英国毕业生表现出较低的MSRA和面试分数,因此获得CST offer的几率较低。要求调整面试的申请人被录用的几率也较低。结论:MSRA绩效与面试和报价结果呈正相关,支持其作为CST选择的客观组成部分的作用。需要对整个招聘周期进行持续监测,以确保流程保持公平、透明,并与外科培训需求保持一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
158
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field. Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书