Evaluating core surgical training selection: Associations between the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA), interview performance and offer outcomes in the 2025 UK national cohort.
J K Seehra, R Ellis, B Doleman, E McLarty, J N Lund
{"title":"Evaluating core surgical training selection: Associations between the Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA), interview performance and offer outcomes in the 2025 UK national cohort.","authors":"J K Seehra, R Ellis, B Doleman, E McLarty, J N Lund","doi":"10.1016/j.surge.2026.03.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) is a national aptitude test increasingly incorporated into selection for Core Surgical Training (CST) in the United Kingdom. Although intended to enhance objectivity and equity, its relationship with subsequent interview performance and final CST offer outcomes remains unexplored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cross-sectional study analysed anonymised data from the 2025 UK CST national selection process. Applicants who completed both the MSRA and structured interview were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models examined associations between applicant characteristics (including demographic factors and requests for interview adjustments) and performance across three stages: MSRA, interview, and CST offer outcome. Results are presented as adjusted regression coefficients (β) or adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 1154 applicants, 1045 had complete data. Female applicants scored higher on the MSRA (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25) and interview (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.30) than males. Higher MSRA performance was associated with higher interview scores (β = 0.22 per 1 SD, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and greater odds of receiving a CST offer (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.94). Non-UK graduates demonstrated lower MSRA and interview scores and consequently had lower odds of receiving a CST offer. Applicants requesting interview adjustments also had lower odds of an offer.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MSRA performance was positively associated with interview and offer outcomes, supporting its role as an objective component of CST selection. Continued monitoring across recruitment cycles is required to ensure the process remains equitable, transparent, and aligned with surgical training needs.</p>","PeriodicalId":49463,"journal":{"name":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgeon-Journal of the Royal Colleges of Surgeons of Edinburgh and Ireland","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surge.2026.03.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: The Multi-Specialty Recruitment Assessment (MSRA) is a national aptitude test increasingly incorporated into selection for Core Surgical Training (CST) in the United Kingdom. Although intended to enhance objectivity and equity, its relationship with subsequent interview performance and final CST offer outcomes remains unexplored.
Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study analysed anonymised data from the 2025 UK CST national selection process. Applicants who completed both the MSRA and structured interview were included. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models examined associations between applicant characteristics (including demographic factors and requests for interview adjustments) and performance across three stages: MSRA, interview, and CST offer outcome. Results are presented as adjusted regression coefficients (β) or adjusted odds ratios (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI).
Results: Of 1154 applicants, 1045 had complete data. Female applicants scored higher on the MSRA (β = 0.13, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.25) and interview (β = 0.18, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.30) than males. Higher MSRA performance was associated with higher interview scores (β = 0.22 per 1 SD, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.32) and greater odds of receiving a CST offer (aOR = 1.42, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.94). Non-UK graduates demonstrated lower MSRA and interview scores and consequently had lower odds of receiving a CST offer. Applicants requesting interview adjustments also had lower odds of an offer.
Conclusion: MSRA performance was positively associated with interview and offer outcomes, supporting its role as an objective component of CST selection. Continued monitoring across recruitment cycles is required to ensure the process remains equitable, transparent, and aligned with surgical training needs.
期刊介绍:
Since its establishment in 2003, The Surgeon has established itself as one of the leading multidisciplinary surgical titles, both in print and online. The Surgeon is published for the worldwide surgical and dental communities. The goal of the Journal is to achieve wider national and international recognition, through a commitment to excellence in original research. In addition, both Colleges see the Journal as an important educational service, and consequently there is a particular focus on post-graduate development. Much of our educational role will continue to be achieved through publishing expanded review articles by leaders in their field.
Articles in related areas to surgery and dentistry, such as healthcare management and education, are also welcomed. We aim to educate, entertain, give insight into new surgical techniques and technology, and provide a forum for debate and discussion.