{"title":"Transcript diversity reflects deleterious RNA processing errors shaped by population size in metazoans.","authors":"Kai Mi, Lili Guan, Bandhan Sarker, Siliang Song, Tianjiao Zhou, Hongliang Yi, Jianzhi Zhang, Chuan Xu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In eukaryotes, alternative transcription initiation (ATI), alternative splicing (AS), and alternative polyadenylation (APA) result in multiple different transcripts per gene, but the biological significance of the transcript diversity produced remains controversial. Some suggested that this diversity is adaptive, while others contended that it is largely deleterious and arises from molecular errors in transcription and RNA processing. The error hypothesis makes a distinct prediction that is not expected under the adaptive hypothesis: transcript diversity declines with the effective population size (Ne) of the species because natural selection minimizing errors is more effective under larger Ne. By analyzing 166 transcriptomes from 75 metazoans, we report that transcript diversity measured by the percentage uses of minor ATI, AS, and APA sites decreases with Ne or its proxies. This observation supports the error hypothesis and suggests that metazoan transcript diversity is largely deleterious.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":"24 3","pages":"e3003671"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13001929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In eukaryotes, alternative transcription initiation (ATI), alternative splicing (AS), and alternative polyadenylation (APA) result in multiple different transcripts per gene, but the biological significance of the transcript diversity produced remains controversial. Some suggested that this diversity is adaptive, while others contended that it is largely deleterious and arises from molecular errors in transcription and RNA processing. The error hypothesis makes a distinct prediction that is not expected under the adaptive hypothesis: transcript diversity declines with the effective population size (Ne) of the species because natural selection minimizing errors is more effective under larger Ne. By analyzing 166 transcriptomes from 75 metazoans, we report that transcript diversity measured by the percentage uses of minor ATI, AS, and APA sites decreases with Ne or its proxies. This observation supports the error hypothesis and suggests that metazoan transcript diversity is largely deleterious.
期刊介绍:
PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions.
The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public.
PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.