Transcript diversity reflects deleterious RNA processing errors shaped by population size in metazoans.

IF 7.2 1区 生物学 Q1 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
PLoS Biology Pub Date : 2026-03-19 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pbio.3003671
Kai Mi, Lili Guan, Bandhan Sarker, Siliang Song, Tianjiao Zhou, Hongliang Yi, Jianzhi Zhang, Chuan Xu
{"title":"Transcript diversity reflects deleterious RNA processing errors shaped by population size in metazoans.","authors":"Kai Mi, Lili Guan, Bandhan Sarker, Siliang Song, Tianjiao Zhou, Hongliang Yi, Jianzhi Zhang, Chuan Xu","doi":"10.1371/journal.pbio.3003671","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In eukaryotes, alternative transcription initiation (ATI), alternative splicing (AS), and alternative polyadenylation (APA) result in multiple different transcripts per gene, but the biological significance of the transcript diversity produced remains controversial. Some suggested that this diversity is adaptive, while others contended that it is largely deleterious and arises from molecular errors in transcription and RNA processing. The error hypothesis makes a distinct prediction that is not expected under the adaptive hypothesis: transcript diversity declines with the effective population size (Ne) of the species because natural selection minimizing errors is more effective under larger Ne. By analyzing 166 transcriptomes from 75 metazoans, we report that transcript diversity measured by the percentage uses of minor ATI, AS, and APA sites decreases with Ne or its proxies. This observation supports the error hypothesis and suggests that metazoan transcript diversity is largely deleterious.</p>","PeriodicalId":49001,"journal":{"name":"PLoS Biology","volume":"24 3","pages":"e3003671"},"PeriodicalIF":7.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13001929/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLoS Biology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.3003671","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In eukaryotes, alternative transcription initiation (ATI), alternative splicing (AS), and alternative polyadenylation (APA) result in multiple different transcripts per gene, but the biological significance of the transcript diversity produced remains controversial. Some suggested that this diversity is adaptive, while others contended that it is largely deleterious and arises from molecular errors in transcription and RNA processing. The error hypothesis makes a distinct prediction that is not expected under the adaptive hypothesis: transcript diversity declines with the effective population size (Ne) of the species because natural selection minimizing errors is more effective under larger Ne. By analyzing 166 transcriptomes from 75 metazoans, we report that transcript diversity measured by the percentage uses of minor ATI, AS, and APA sites decreases with Ne or its proxies. This observation supports the error hypothesis and suggests that metazoan transcript diversity is largely deleterious.

转录物多样性反映了由后生动物群体大小形成的有害RNA加工错误。
在真核生物中,选择性转录起始(ATI)、选择性剪接(AS)和选择性聚腺苷酸化(APA)导致每个基因产生多个不同的转录本,但转录本多样性的生物学意义仍然存在争议。一些人认为这种多样性是适应性的,而另一些人则认为它在很大程度上是有害的,是由转录和RNA加工中的分子错误引起的。误差假设做出了一个与适应性假设不同的预测:转录本多样性随着物种的有效种群大小(Ne)而下降,因为在较大的Ne下,最小化误差的自然选择更有效。通过分析来自75个后生动物的166个转录组,我们报告了通过使用次要ATI, AS和APA位点的百分比来衡量的转录多样性随着Ne或其代理而减少。这一观察结果支持了错误假说,并表明后生动物转录多样性在很大程度上是有害的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
PLoS Biology
PLoS Biology BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY-BIOLOGY
CiteScore
15.40
自引率
2.00%
发文量
359
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: PLOS Biology is the flagship journal of the Public Library of Science (PLOS) and focuses on publishing groundbreaking and relevant research in all areas of biological science. The journal features works at various scales, ranging from molecules to ecosystems, and also encourages interdisciplinary studies. PLOS Biology publishes articles that demonstrate exceptional significance, originality, and relevance, with a high standard of scientific rigor in methodology, reporting, and conclusions. The journal aims to advance science and serve the research community by transforming research communication to align with the research process. It offers evolving article types and policies that empower authors to share the complete story behind their scientific findings with a diverse global audience of researchers, educators, policymakers, patient advocacy groups, and the general public. PLOS Biology, along with other PLOS journals, is widely indexed by major services such as Crossref, Dimensions, DOAJ, Google Scholar, PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Web of Science. Additionally, PLOS Biology is indexed by various other services including AGRICOLA, Biological Abstracts, BIOSYS Previews, CABI CAB Abstracts, CABI Global Health, CAPES, CAS, CNKI, Embase, Journal Guide, MEDLINE, and Zoological Record, ensuring that the research content is easily accessible and discoverable by a wide range of audiences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书