A Phase 2b Multicenter Study to Evaluate Basmisanil as an Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia.

IF 4.6 2区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY
Daniel Umbricht, Markus Abt, Michael Derks, Maria-Clemencia Hernandez, Nikhat Parkar, Diana Negron, Annette Koerner, Stefan Holiga, Celia Goeldner
{"title":"A Phase 2b Multicenter Study to Evaluate Basmisanil as an Adjunctive Treatment in Patients With Cognitive Impairment Associated With Schizophrenia.","authors":"Daniel Umbricht, Markus Abt, Michael Derks, Maria-Clemencia Hernandez, Nikhat Parkar, Diana Negron, Annette Koerner, Stefan Holiga, Celia Goeldner","doi":"10.4088/JCP.25m16022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is a key driver of functional deficits in patients with this disorder. CIAS may involve deficient NMDA receptor-dependent neurotransmission. Negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A (GABA<sub>A</sub>) α5 receptors enhance their activity and improve cognition in rodents and nonhuman primates. We tested whether prolonged treatment with basmisanil-a selective GABA<sub>A </sub>α5 NAM-improved CIAS.</p><p><p><b>Methods:</b> This 24-week placebo-controlled phase 2b study in patients with CIAS diagnosed according to <i>DSM-5</i> was conducted between November 2016 and December 2019. Two hundred thirteen patients were randomized to 80 mg of basmisanil, 240 mg of basmisanil, or placebo twice a day. Recruitment into the 80 mg group was stopped after a planned futility analysis. The primary outcome was the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) neurocognitive composite score evaluated in the efficacy analysis population (EAP) in the placebo (n=76) and basmisanil 240 mg arms only (n=77, total EAP n=153). Secondary outcome measures included specific hippocampal and prefrontal-dependent cognitive tasks, functional outcomes, and symptoms. Novel study design features addressing potential sources of heterogeneity in drug response and learning and practice effects included stratification by cognitive trajectories and age as well as repeated administration of the MCCB test battery during screening.</p><p><p><b>Results:</b> Twenty-four weeks of treatment with basmisanil was well tolerated without improving cognitive or functional measures overall or in any of the stratified subgroups. Practice and learning effects were not observed at week 12.</p><p><p><b>Conclusion:</b> Basmisanil did not improve cognitive deficits. Although unsuccessful, some results offer insight into important factors that should facilitate the design of more informative trials.</p><p><p><b>Trial Registration:</b> ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953639.</p>","PeriodicalId":50234,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","volume":"87 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.25m16022","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Cognitive impairment associated with schizophrenia (CIAS) is a key driver of functional deficits in patients with this disorder. CIAS may involve deficient NMDA receptor-dependent neurotransmission. Negative allosteric modulators (NAMs) of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) type A (GABAA) α5 receptors enhance their activity and improve cognition in rodents and nonhuman primates. We tested whether prolonged treatment with basmisanil-a selective GABAA α5 NAM-improved CIAS.

Methods: This 24-week placebo-controlled phase 2b study in patients with CIAS diagnosed according to DSM-5 was conducted between November 2016 and December 2019. Two hundred thirteen patients were randomized to 80 mg of basmisanil, 240 mg of basmisanil, or placebo twice a day. Recruitment into the 80 mg group was stopped after a planned futility analysis. The primary outcome was the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB) neurocognitive composite score evaluated in the efficacy analysis population (EAP) in the placebo (n=76) and basmisanil 240 mg arms only (n=77, total EAP n=153). Secondary outcome measures included specific hippocampal and prefrontal-dependent cognitive tasks, functional outcomes, and symptoms. Novel study design features addressing potential sources of heterogeneity in drug response and learning and practice effects included stratification by cognitive trajectories and age as well as repeated administration of the MCCB test battery during screening.

Results: Twenty-four weeks of treatment with basmisanil was well tolerated without improving cognitive or functional measures overall or in any of the stratified subgroups. Practice and learning effects were not observed at week 12.

Conclusion: Basmisanil did not improve cognitive deficits. Although unsuccessful, some results offer insight into important factors that should facilitate the design of more informative trials.

Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02953639.

一项评估Basmisanil作为精神分裂症相关认知障碍患者辅助治疗的2b期多中心研究
目的:认知障碍与精神分裂症(CIAS)相关是精神分裂症患者功能缺陷的关键驱动因素。CIAS可能涉及缺乏NMDA受体依赖的神经传递。γ-氨基丁酸(GABA) A型(GABAA) α5受体负变构调节剂(NAMs)可增强其活性并改善啮齿动物和非人灵长类动物的认知功能。我们测试了巴米沙尼尔(一种选择性GABAA α5 nam)长期治疗是否改善了CIAS。方法:这项为期24周的安慰剂对照2b期研究于2016年11月至2019年12月在根据DSM-5诊断的CIAS患者中进行。213名患者被随机分为80毫克、240毫克或安慰剂组,每天两次。80毫克组的招募在计划的无效分析后停止。主要终点是在安慰剂组(n=76)和basmisanil 240 mg组(n=77,总EAP n=153)的疗效分析群体(EAP)中评估的metrics共识认知电池(MCCB)神经认知综合评分。次要结果测量包括特定海马和前额叶依赖的认知任务、功能结果和症状。新的研究设计特点解决了药物反应、学习和实践效果的潜在异质性来源,包括认知轨迹和年龄分层,以及在筛选过程中重复使用MCCB测试组。结果:24周的巴米沙尼治疗耐受性良好,总体或任何分层亚组的认知或功能测量均未改善。第12周未观察到练习和学习效果。结论:Basmisanil对认知缺陷无改善作用。虽然不成功,但一些结果提供了对重要因素的洞察,这些因素应该有助于设计更多信息丰富的试验。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02953639。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry
Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
1.90%
发文量
0
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: For over 75 years, The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry has been a leading source of peer-reviewed articles offering the latest information on mental health topics to psychiatrists and other medical professionals.The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry is the leading psychiatric resource for clinical information and covers disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, addiction, posttraumatic stress disorder, and attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder while exploring the newest advances in diagnosis and treatment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书