{"title":"Enhancing patient care: the power of librarian-mediated literature reviews.","authors":"Heather J Martin, Carrie Grinstead, Danielle Linden","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our health system library fields thousands of requests for literature searches each year in support of research, policy, evidence-based practice projects, and care for individual patients. With fewer library staff than comparable institutions and an engaged, multidisciplinary clinical workforce, we face ongoing pressures to do more with less and to demonstrate our value.</p><p><strong>Case presentation: </strong>A 2021 article in the <i>Journal of Hospital Librarianship</i> offered an existing survey and basic project design that we used to assess our impacts. We adapted, with permission, the survey and methods of \"Analysis of a Hospital Librarian Mediated Literature Search Service at a Regional Health Service in Australia,\" a quality improvement project authored by Siemensma et al. (2021) [1]. Throughout 2023 we sent the adapted survey to all employees and affiliated clinicians who requested literature searches. The survey included five multiple choice questions as well as a free text box for comments. Respondents were asked to provide simple demographic information and consider the impact and quality of results they received from the librarian.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our survey-based evaluation of our literature search service underscores the importance of librarian-mediated literature searches for clinical practice, policy development, and patient care. Demonstrating hospital library impacts is increasingly important and increasingly challenging for understaffed teams. Assessments using previously published surveys are feasible for non-academic libraries and serve as compelling cases for the continued and expanded integration of library resources into clinical practice and decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 2","pages":"164-168"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13075576/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.2246","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Our health system library fields thousands of requests for literature searches each year in support of research, policy, evidence-based practice projects, and care for individual patients. With fewer library staff than comparable institutions and an engaged, multidisciplinary clinical workforce, we face ongoing pressures to do more with less and to demonstrate our value.
Case presentation: A 2021 article in the Journal of Hospital Librarianship offered an existing survey and basic project design that we used to assess our impacts. We adapted, with permission, the survey and methods of "Analysis of a Hospital Librarian Mediated Literature Search Service at a Regional Health Service in Australia," a quality improvement project authored by Siemensma et al. (2021) [1]. Throughout 2023 we sent the adapted survey to all employees and affiliated clinicians who requested literature searches. The survey included five multiple choice questions as well as a free text box for comments. Respondents were asked to provide simple demographic information and consider the impact and quality of results they received from the librarian.
Conclusions: Our survey-based evaluation of our literature search service underscores the importance of librarian-mediated literature searches for clinical practice, policy development, and patient care. Demonstrating hospital library impacts is increasingly important and increasingly challenging for understaffed teams. Assessments using previously published surveys are feasible for non-academic libraries and serve as compelling cases for the continued and expanded integration of library resources into clinical practice and decision-making.
背景:我们的卫生系统图书馆每年都会收到数以千计的文献检索请求,以支持研究、政策、循证实践项目和对个体患者的护理。与同类机构相比,图书馆的工作人员更少,而临床工作人员多学科敬业,我们面临着持续的压力,要用更少的资源做更多的事情,并展示我们的价值。案例介绍:《医院图书馆杂志》(Journal of Hospital Librarianship) 2021年的一篇文章提供了一个现有的调查和基本项目设计,我们用来评估我们的影响。在获得许可的情况下,我们改编了Siemensma等人(2021)撰写的质量改进项目“澳大利亚地区卫生服务中医院图书管理员介导的文献检索服务分析”的调查和方法。在整个2023年,我们向所有要求进行文献检索的员工和附属临床医生发送了改编后的调查。该调查包括五个选择题和一个供评论的免费文本框。受访者被要求提供简单的人口统计信息,并考虑他们从图书管理员那里得到的结果的影响和质量。结论:我们基于调查的文献检索服务评估强调了图书馆员介导的文献检索对临床实践、政策制定和患者护理的重要性。对于人手不足的团队来说,展示医院图书馆的影响越来越重要,也越来越具有挑战性。使用先前发表的调查进行评估对于非学术图书馆是可行的,并且为图书馆资源持续和扩大地整合到临床实践和决策中提供了令人信服的案例。
期刊介绍:
The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.