Dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory problems in people with chronic respiratory illness.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Phyllis M Palmer, Paula Leslie
{"title":"Dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory problems in people with chronic respiratory illness.","authors":"Phyllis M Palmer, Paula Leslie","doi":"10.1097/SPC.0000000000000803","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory dysfunction are interlinked with shared neural control and biomechanical demands. Recent respiratory-swallow coordination research and scrutiny of long-standing dysphagia interventions necessitate reappraisal of aspiration risk, airway protection, and clinical decision making. These issues are particularly relevant in chronic respiratory illness and palliative care, where dyspnoea, frailty, and quality-of-life considerations strongly influence eating and drinking decisions.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Breathing and swallowing are coordinated by overlapping brainstem pattern generators, a fundamental neural relationship in airway protection with important implications for eating and drinking across health and disease. Chronic respiratory disease disrupts this coordination through heightened respiratory drive and reduced physiologic reserve. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that aspiration alone does not predict adverse pulmonary outcomes; rather the consequences depend on aspirate characteristics, bacterial burden, and host defences. Traditional interventions such as thickened liquids, non-oral feeding, and the use of chin tuck show limited evidence for preventing pulmonary complications and may increase dyspnoea or distress.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>Current evidence supports moving beyond aspiration as a binary outcome toward individualized, person-centred risk-benefit assessment. Good oral health care is a significant and underused approach to reducing respiratory complications. Expiratory muscle strength training and motor imagery show promise in supporting impaired swallow and respiratory function. Frameworks integrating host factors, respiratory status, and lived experience better support ethical, informed clinical decision making, particularly in chronic respiratory disease and palliative care.</p>","PeriodicalId":48837,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","volume":" ","pages":"88-97"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000803","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/30 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Dysphagia, aspiration, and respiratory dysfunction are interlinked with shared neural control and biomechanical demands. Recent respiratory-swallow coordination research and scrutiny of long-standing dysphagia interventions necessitate reappraisal of aspiration risk, airway protection, and clinical decision making. These issues are particularly relevant in chronic respiratory illness and palliative care, where dyspnoea, frailty, and quality-of-life considerations strongly influence eating and drinking decisions.

Recent findings: Breathing and swallowing are coordinated by overlapping brainstem pattern generators, a fundamental neural relationship in airway protection with important implications for eating and drinking across health and disease. Chronic respiratory disease disrupts this coordination through heightened respiratory drive and reduced physiologic reserve. Evidence increasingly demonstrates that aspiration alone does not predict adverse pulmonary outcomes; rather the consequences depend on aspirate characteristics, bacterial burden, and host defences. Traditional interventions such as thickened liquids, non-oral feeding, and the use of chin tuck show limited evidence for preventing pulmonary complications and may increase dyspnoea or distress.

Summary: Current evidence supports moving beyond aspiration as a binary outcome toward individualized, person-centred risk-benefit assessment. Good oral health care is a significant and underused approach to reducing respiratory complications. Expiratory muscle strength training and motor imagery show promise in supporting impaired swallow and respiratory function. Frameworks integrating host factors, respiratory status, and lived experience better support ethical, informed clinical decision making, particularly in chronic respiratory disease and palliative care.

慢性呼吸系统疾病患者的吞咽困难、误吸和呼吸问题。
目的:吞咽困难、误吸和呼吸功能障碍与共同的神经控制和生物力学需求相关。最近的呼吸-吞咽协调研究和长期吞咽困难干预措施的审查需要重新评估误吸风险,气道保护和临床决策。这些问题与慢性呼吸系统疾病和姑息治疗尤其相关,在这些疾病中,呼吸困难、虚弱和生活质量的考虑强烈地影响着饮食决定。最近的研究发现:呼吸和吞咽是由重叠的脑干模式发生器协调的,这是气道保护中的一种基本神经关系,对健康和疾病中的饮食具有重要意义。慢性呼吸道疾病通过增强呼吸动力和减少生理储备来破坏这种协调。越来越多的证据表明,单靠吸入术并不能预测不良的肺部结局;相反,结果取决于吸入特性、细菌负担和宿主防御。传统的干预措施,如增稠液体、非口服喂养和收下巴,对预防肺部并发症的证据有限,并可能增加呼吸困难或窘迫。总结:目前的证据支持将期望作为二元结果转向个性化的、以人为中心的风险-收益评估。良好的口腔卫生保健是减少呼吸道并发症的重要而未充分利用的方法。呼气肌力量训练和运动想象显示了支持受损吞咽和呼吸功能的希望。整合宿主因素、呼吸状态和生活经验的框架更好地支持合乎道德的、知情的临床决策,特别是在慢性呼吸疾病和姑息治疗方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care
Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
期刊介绍: A reader-friendly resource, Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care provides an up-to-date account of the most important advances in the field of supportive and palliative care. Each issue contains either two or three sections delivering a diverse and comprehensive coverage of all the key issues, including end-of-life management, gastrointestinal systems and respiratory problems. Current Opinion in Supportive and Palliative Care is an indispensable journal for the busy clinician, researcher or student.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书