Expert-recommended tasks for hospital librarians during a healthcare system merger or acquisition: an e-Delphi consensus statement.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q1 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Journal of the Medical Library Association Pub Date : 2026-04-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-13 DOI:10.5195/jmla.2026.2031
Stacy Posillico, Jaclyn Morales, Saori Wendy Herman
{"title":"Expert-recommended tasks for hospital librarians during a healthcare system merger or acquisition: an e-Delphi consensus statement.","authors":"Stacy Posillico, Jaclyn Morales, Saori Wendy Herman","doi":"10.5195/jmla.2026.2031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Limited empirical research is available to guide hospital librarians through a healthcare system merger or acquisition. To address this knowledge gap, an e-Delphi research study was used to develop recommended tasks that librarians should consider when consolidating the delivery of library services to a newly merged, geographically distributed healthcare system.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This e-Delphi study was conducted and reported according to the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES). The expert panel, composed of 29 hospital librarians, responded to four rounds of questionnaires during April to December 2022. In Round 1, the panelists' qualitative responses were collected and analyzed via thematic analysis to identify potential recommended tasks. In Rounds 2 through 4, tasks were eliminated or prioritized based upon the panelists' rating of each task using a seven-point Likert scale. Those tasks rated as 5, 6, or 7 by ≥75% of the panelists were included in the final consensus statement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The consensus statement identifies 330 recommended tasks. Highly prioritized tasks involve cultivating beneficial relationships with others throughout the merger, particularly newly blended library teams, finance and administrative leadership, information technology/services, and vendors. Marketing and outreach activities and physical library space management tasks were not prioritized. The panelists emphasized understanding organizational context and culture throughout any merger.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The recommended tasks can be used by hospital librarians to create an action plan for consolidating and delivering library services in the event of a healthcare system merger or acquisition. Future research on the utility of the recommendations is anticipated.</p>","PeriodicalId":47690,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","volume":"114 2","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13075583/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Medical Library Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2026.2031","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/13 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Limited empirical research is available to guide hospital librarians through a healthcare system merger or acquisition. To address this knowledge gap, an e-Delphi research study was used to develop recommended tasks that librarians should consider when consolidating the delivery of library services to a newly merged, geographically distributed healthcare system.

Methods: This e-Delphi study was conducted and reported according to the Guidance on Conducting and REporting DElphi Studies (CREDES). The expert panel, composed of 29 hospital librarians, responded to four rounds of questionnaires during April to December 2022. In Round 1, the panelists' qualitative responses were collected and analyzed via thematic analysis to identify potential recommended tasks. In Rounds 2 through 4, tasks were eliminated or prioritized based upon the panelists' rating of each task using a seven-point Likert scale. Those tasks rated as 5, 6, or 7 by ≥75% of the panelists were included in the final consensus statement.

Results: The consensus statement identifies 330 recommended tasks. Highly prioritized tasks involve cultivating beneficial relationships with others throughout the merger, particularly newly blended library teams, finance and administrative leadership, information technology/services, and vendors. Marketing and outreach activities and physical library space management tasks were not prioritized. The panelists emphasized understanding organizational context and culture throughout any merger.

Conclusions: The recommended tasks can be used by hospital librarians to create an action plan for consolidating and delivering library services in the event of a healthcare system merger or acquisition. Future research on the utility of the recommendations is anticipated.

专家推荐的任务医院图书馆员在医疗保健系统合并或收购:一个e-Delphi共识声明。
目的:有限的实证研究可用于指导医院图书馆员通过医疗保健系统的并购。为了解决这一知识鸿沟,我们使用了e-Delphi研究来开发推荐任务,当图书馆服务整合到一个新合并的、地理分布的医疗保健系统时,图书馆员应该考虑这些任务。方法:本e-德尔菲研究按照德尔菲研究进行和报告指南(CREDES)进行和报告。由29名医院图书管理员组成的专家小组在2022年4月至12月期间回答了四轮问卷调查。在第一轮中,通过专题分析收集和分析小组成员的定性回答,以确定潜在的推荐任务。在第二轮到第四轮中,根据小组成员使用7分李克特量表对每个任务的评分,任务被淘汰或优先排序。那些被≥75%的专家组成员评为5、6或7的任务被纳入最终共识声明。结果:共识声明确定了330个推荐任务。高度优先的任务包括在合并过程中培养与他人的有益关系,特别是新合并的图书馆团队、财务和行政领导、信息技术/服务和供应商。销售和外联活动以及实体图书馆空间管理任务没有列为优先事项。小组成员强调在任何合并过程中都要理解组织背景和文化。结论:医院图书馆员可以使用推荐的任务来创建一个行动计划,以便在医疗保健系统合并或收购的情况下整合和提供图书馆服务。预计今后将对这些建议的效用进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the Medical Library Association
Journal of the Medical Library Association INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Medical Library Association (JMLA) is an international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly that aims to advance the practice and research knowledgebase of health sciences librarianship. The most current impact factor for the JMLA (from the 2007 edition of Journal Citation Reports) is 1.392.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书