Piloting Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Cleft Lip and Palate Services in Aotearoa New Zealand.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q2 Dentistry
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal Pub Date : 2026-11-01 Epub Date: 2026-04-15 DOI:10.1177/10556656261431254
Kenny Ardouin, Nicola Stock, Tika Ormond, Phoebe Macrae
{"title":"Piloting Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Cleft Lip and Palate Services in Aotearoa New Zealand.","authors":"Kenny Ardouin, Nicola Stock, Tika Ormond, Phoebe Macrae","doi":"10.1177/10556656261431254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>ObjectiveStandardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are rarely used in cleft lip and palate (CL/P) care within New Zealand (NZ). This pilot study sought to obtain a baseline of patient-reported outcomes in NZ and evaluate clinicians' experiences of implementing PROMs into CL/P services.DesignA mixed methods cross-sectional design using CLEFT-Q scales. Data were compared to published CL/P CLEFT-Q norms using <i>t</i>-tests, and within-group differences were investigated. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.SettingFive CL/P teams in Aotearoa New Zealand.ParticipantsPatients aged 12+ years (<i>n</i> = 101) were recruited through the five Health NZ CL/P teams between April 2023-March 2024. Five CL/P team members responsible for recruitment participated in an interview at the conclusion of the trial.ResultsCompared with normative data, patients reported more favorable outcomes on speech distress and school function, and poorer psychological function. Speech and social function scores were aligned with CL/P norms. Patients aged 18+ reported the lowest psychological functioning and females reported the lowest social functioning. Clinicians recognized the value of PROMs, yet highlighted concerns about insufficient resourcing to administer, review, and provide follow-up.ConclusionsPsychological function is indicated as an area of concern, particularly for adults with CL/P. Routine use of PROMs would evaluate change in measures of function over time and enhance patient-centered holistic care. Greater personnel and IT resourcing would facilitate routine implementation of PROMs in CL/P teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":49220,"journal":{"name":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","volume":" ","pages":"3805-3816"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2026-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13646430/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10556656261431254","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveStandardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are rarely used in cleft lip and palate (CL/P) care within New Zealand (NZ). This pilot study sought to obtain a baseline of patient-reported outcomes in NZ and evaluate clinicians' experiences of implementing PROMs into CL/P services.DesignA mixed methods cross-sectional design using CLEFT-Q scales. Data were compared to published CL/P CLEFT-Q norms using t-tests, and within-group differences were investigated. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using codebook thematic analysis.SettingFive CL/P teams in Aotearoa New Zealand.ParticipantsPatients aged 12+ years (n = 101) were recruited through the five Health NZ CL/P teams between April 2023-March 2024. Five CL/P team members responsible for recruitment participated in an interview at the conclusion of the trial.ResultsCompared with normative data, patients reported more favorable outcomes on speech distress and school function, and poorer psychological function. Speech and social function scores were aligned with CL/P norms. Patients aged 18+ reported the lowest psychological functioning and females reported the lowest social functioning. Clinicians recognized the value of PROMs, yet highlighted concerns about insufficient resourcing to administer, review, and provide follow-up.ConclusionsPsychological function is indicated as an area of concern, particularly for adults with CL/P. Routine use of PROMs would evaluate change in measures of function over time and enhance patient-centered holistic care. Greater personnel and IT resourcing would facilitate routine implementation of PROMs in CL/P teams.

试点患者报告的结果措施在唇腭裂服务在新西兰奥特罗阿。
目的标准化的患者报告结果测量(PROMs)在新西兰的唇腭裂(CL/P)护理中很少使用。该试点研究旨在获得新西兰患者报告结果的基线,并评估临床医生在CL/P服务中实施PROMs的经验。设计采用CLEFT-Q量表进行混合方法横断面设计。使用t检验将数据与已发表的CL/P CLEFT-Q规范进行比较,并调查组内差异。定性访谈采用代码本专题分析。在新西兰奥特罗亚设立5个CL/P团队。在2023年4月至2024年3月期间,通过新西兰卫生部的五个CL/P团队招募了年龄在12岁以上的患者(n = 101)。5名负责招募的CL/P团队成员在试验结束时参加了面试。结果与常规数据相比,患者在语言障碍和学习功能方面的预后较好,而心理功能较差。言语和社会功能得分与CL/P标准一致。18岁以上的患者心理功能最低,女性患者社会功能最低。临床医生认识到PROMs的价值,但强调了管理、审查和提供随访的资源不足的担忧。结论心理功能是一个值得关注的领域,特别是对于成人CL/P。常规使用PROMs将评估功能随时间的变化,并加强以患者为中心的整体护理。更多的人力和资讯科技资源,将有助在资讯科技及项目管理小组推行日常的专业知识管理计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal
Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-SURGERY
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
36.40%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Journal (CPCJ) is the premiere peer-reviewed, interdisciplinary, international journal dedicated to current research on etiology, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment in all areas pertaining to craniofacial anomalies. CPCJ reports on basic science and clinical research aimed at better elucidating the pathogenesis, pathology, and optimal methods of treatment of cleft and craniofacial anomalies. The journal strives to foster communication and cooperation among professionals from all specialties.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书