Mehmet Murat Günay, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, İlker Akyıldız, Serap Er, Dilara Söylemez, Murad Mutlu, Muharrem Dağlı
{"title":"Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria.","authors":"Mehmet Murat Günay, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, İlker Akyıldız, Serap Er, Dilara Söylemez, Murad Mutlu, Muharrem Dağlı","doi":"10.4274/tao.2026.2025-11-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2026.2025-11-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution.
Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed.
Results: The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes.
Conclusion: CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.