Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria.

IF 0.6 Q4 OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY
Mehmet Murat Günay, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, İlker Akyıldız, Serap Er, Dilara Söylemez, Murad Mutlu, Muharrem Dağlı
{"title":"Evaluation of Extended Indications for Cochlear Implantation Beyond Conventional Criteria.","authors":"Mehmet Murat Günay, Sibel Alicura Tokgöz, İlker Akyıldız, Serap Er, Dilara Söylemez, Murad Mutlu, Muharrem Dağlı","doi":"10.4274/tao.2026.2025-11-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.</p>","PeriodicalId":44240,"journal":{"name":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Turkish Archives of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/tao.2026.2025-11-17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This study evaluated the indications for cochlear implant (CI) that extend beyond the current criteria of the Health Implementation Communiqué (HIC) of the Turkish Social Security Institution.

Methods: A retrospective review was performed on 27 patients who underwent CI, even though they did not meet the HIC criteria. All cases were approved by the Scientific Advisory Board on Auditory Implants of the Ministry of Health. Demographic, clinical, and audiological data, including pre- and post-operative pure-tone averages (PTA) and speech discrimination scores (SDS), were analyzed.

Results: The cohort included 15 females and 12 males, with a median age of 17 years. Etiologies comprised congenital hearing loss (n=14), idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss (n=3), post-meningitic hearing loss (n=2), Menière's disease (n=1), and other acquired causes. Exclusion from the HIC criteria was mainly due to age restrictions for bilateral CI, audiological thresholds outside defined limits, single-sided deafness, SDS above 30%, or a gap of more than four years between chronological and language age. Audiological outcomes from 22 patients revealed a median PTA with the CI alone of 35 dB hearing level and a median SDS of 58%, with significant improvement compared to baseline (p<0.001). While most patients demonstrated substantial benefit, 14.8% (cases 6, 17, 21, 25) exhibited poor performance (SDS <30%). Case analyses underscored the impact of etiology and duration of auditory deprivation on outcomes.

Conclusion: CI beyond conventional reimbursement criteria can provide meaningful functional gains. Individualized, evidence-based, multidisciplinary evaluation supports broader access to hearing rehabilitation and is consistent with global trends in personalized auditory care.

超出常规标准的人工耳蜗植入术扩展指征的评价。
目的:本研究评估了人工耳蜗(CI)的适应症,这些适应症超出了土耳其社会保障机构卫生实施公报(HIC)的现行标准。方法:对27例不符合HIC标准的CI患者进行回顾性分析。所有病例均经卫生部听觉植入科学咨询委员会批准。统计、临床和听力学数据,包括术前和术后纯音平均(PTA)和言语辨别评分(SDS)进行分析。结果:该队列包括15名女性和12名男性,中位年龄为17岁。病因包括先天性听力损失(n=14)、特发性突发性感音神经性听力损失(n=3)、脑膜炎后听力损失(n=2)、meni病(n=1)和其他获得性原因。排除在HIC标准之外的主要原因是双侧CI的年龄限制,听力学阈值超出定义范围,单侧耳聋,SDS超过30%,或实足年龄和语言年龄之间的差距超过4岁。来自22名患者的听力学结果显示,单独CI的中位PTA为35 dB听力水平,中位SDS为58%,与基线相比有显著改善(结论:超过传统报销标准的CI可以提供有意义的功能增益)。个性化的、基于证据的、多学科的评估支持更广泛的听力康复,并与个性化听觉护理的全球趋势一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书