Approaches to Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Among Thoracic Surgeons: A Survey Study From Türkiye.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2026-03-23 eCollection Date: 2026-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2025.04903
Melike Ulker, Volkan Erdogu, Ali Cevat Kutluk, Muzaffer Metin
{"title":"Approaches to Mediastinal Staging in NSCLC Among Thoracic Surgeons: A Survey Study From Türkiye.","authors":"Melike Ulker, Volkan Erdogu, Ali Cevat Kutluk, Muzaffer Metin","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2025.04903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Mediastinal lymph node staging is a critical step in the treatment algorithm for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Current guidelines define the patient groups in which invasive or minimally invasive mediastinal lymph node sampling is required during preoperative staging. This study aimed to determine the extent to which thoracic surgeons actively practicing in Türkiye adhere to these guideline recommendations and to assess the concordance between their daily clinical practices and these recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A guideline-based survey, including nine case scenarios, was emailed to 417 thoracic surgeons registered with the Turkish Thoracic Surgery Association. The survey collected data on participants' demographic characteristics, institutional profiles, and approaches to each clinical scenario. Responses were analyzed for concordance with guideline recommendations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 29.2% (n=122). A total of 48.3% of the participants possessed an academic title, and 77.8% were employed at training and research or university hospitals. In scenarios involving a radiologically positive, single, non-bulky N2 lymph node, 85.2% of respondents indicated that invasive mediastinal staging was required by guidelines. In contrast, among patients without radiologic evidence of N2 disease, the proportion of surgeons recommending mediastinal staging was 19.7% for squamous cell carcinoma >3 cm in size and 36.9% for adenocarcinoma. For centrally located tumors, 59% of participants recommended staging. Notably, there was substantial variation in opinions regarding the necessity of invasive sampling for suspicious aortopulmonary window lymph nodes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Thoracic surgeons in Türkiye generally exhibit approaches to mediastinal staging that align with guideline recommendations; however, variations exist in certain subgroups. Standardization is particularly needed in the definition of central tumors, the approach to sampling aortopulmonary lymph node stations, and staging strategies based on histologic tumor type. These findings highlight the importance of educational and awareness initiatives aimed at improving the integration of guideline recommendations into clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":"60 1","pages":"71-78"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-03-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13077208/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2025.04903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Mediastinal lymph node staging is a critical step in the treatment algorithm for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Current guidelines define the patient groups in which invasive or minimally invasive mediastinal lymph node sampling is required during preoperative staging. This study aimed to determine the extent to which thoracic surgeons actively practicing in Türkiye adhere to these guideline recommendations and to assess the concordance between their daily clinical practices and these recommendations.

Methods: A guideline-based survey, including nine case scenarios, was emailed to 417 thoracic surgeons registered with the Turkish Thoracic Surgery Association. The survey collected data on participants' demographic characteristics, institutional profiles, and approaches to each clinical scenario. Responses were analyzed for concordance with guideline recommendations.

Results: The survey response rate was 29.2% (n=122). A total of 48.3% of the participants possessed an academic title, and 77.8% were employed at training and research or university hospitals. In scenarios involving a radiologically positive, single, non-bulky N2 lymph node, 85.2% of respondents indicated that invasive mediastinal staging was required by guidelines. In contrast, among patients without radiologic evidence of N2 disease, the proportion of surgeons recommending mediastinal staging was 19.7% for squamous cell carcinoma >3 cm in size and 36.9% for adenocarcinoma. For centrally located tumors, 59% of participants recommended staging. Notably, there was substantial variation in opinions regarding the necessity of invasive sampling for suspicious aortopulmonary window lymph nodes.

Conclusion: Thoracic surgeons in Türkiye generally exhibit approaches to mediastinal staging that align with guideline recommendations; however, variations exist in certain subgroups. Standardization is particularly needed in the definition of central tumors, the approach to sampling aortopulmonary lymph node stations, and staging strategies based on histologic tumor type. These findings highlight the importance of educational and awareness initiatives aimed at improving the integration of guideline recommendations into clinical practice.

胸外科医生中非小细胞肺癌纵隔分期的方法:来自 rkiye的调查研究。
目的:纵隔淋巴结分期是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)治疗算法的关键步骤。目前的指南定义了在术前分期中需要进行侵入性或微创纵隔淋巴结取样的患者组。本研究旨在确定在 rkiye积极执业的胸外科医生在多大程度上遵守这些指南建议,并评估他们日常临床实践与这些建议之间的一致性。方法:一项基于指南的调查,包括9个案例,通过电子邮件发送给417名在土耳其胸外科协会注册的胸外科医生。调查收集了参与者的人口统计学特征、机构概况和每个临床方案的方法的数据。分析反应与指南建议的一致性。结果:调查回复率为29.2% (n=122)。共有48.3%的参与者拥有学术职称,77.8%的参与者受雇于培训和研究或大学医院。在放射学阳性、单个、非大体积N2淋巴结的情况下,85.2%的受访者表示指南要求浸润性纵隔分期。相比之下,在没有N2疾病放射学证据的患者中,推荐纵隔分期的外科医生比例为19.7%,大小为30cm的鳞状细胞癌和36.9%的腺癌。对于中心位置的肿瘤,59%的参与者推荐分期。值得注意的是,对于是否有必要对可疑的主动脉肺窗淋巴结进行有创取样的意见存在很大差异。结论: rkiye胸外科医生通常采用与指南建议一致的纵隔分期方法;然而,在某些亚组中存在差异。中心肿瘤的定义、主动脉肺淋巴结的取样方法以及基于肿瘤组织学类型的分期策略尤其需要标准化。这些发现强调了教育和宣传活动的重要性,这些活动旨在改善指南建议与临床实践的结合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书