Clinical Predictors of Weaning Failure and Mortality in Individuals With COVID-19 Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.9 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM
Natália Trindade, Larissa Araújo de Castro, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola, Carrie Chueiri Ramos Galvan, Josiane Marques Felcar, Ercy Mara Cipulo Ramos, Vanessa Suziane Probst
{"title":"Clinical Predictors of Weaning Failure and Mortality in Individuals With COVID-19 Undergoing Invasive Mechanical Ventilation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Natália Trindade, Larissa Araújo de Castro, Walter Sepúlveda-Loyola, Carrie Chueiri Ramos Galvan, Josiane Marques Felcar, Ercy Mara Cipulo Ramos, Vanessa Suziane Probst","doi":"10.1155/pm/9316439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant number of affected individuals experienced acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Once IMV becomes necessary, substantial efforts are made to conduct a successful ventilatory weaning process and prevent deleterious effects associated with prolonged positive pressure use. Identifying the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who experienced failure in ventilatory weaning can provide insights to optimize ventilatory management.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study is aimed at identifying predictors of weaning failure (WF) from IMV in patients with COVID-19 and their association with mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective cohort study analyzed data obtained from medical records, including personal and clinical information, IMV parameters, ventilatory mechanics, IMV duration, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and discharge or death date. All COVID-19 patients admitted between March 2020 and July 2022, aged ≥ 18 years, and requiring IMV were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: weaning success (WS), WF, and no criteria for weaning (NCW). Success was defined as orotracheal prosthesis removal without reintubation within 48 h or, for tracheostomized patients, disconnection from mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2.198 individuals were included, of whom 528 (age 52 [39-61] years, 195 men, and body mass index 29 [26-34] kg/m<sup>2</sup>) met the criteria for weaning and were analyzed (WS: n = 380, 195 men; WF: n = 148, 89 men). Individuals in the WS group were younger (WS: 52 [39-61] vs. WF: 56 [47-67] years; p < 0.0001) and had shorter ICU stay (WS: 16 [10-27] vs. WF: 29 [14-45] days; p < 0.0001) and IMV duration (WS: 12 [7-20] vs. WF: 25 [14-37] days; p < 0.0001). Independent predictors of WF included age (OR [95% CI]: 1.028 [1.005-1.052]), length of hospital stay (OR [95% CI]: 0.963 [0.937-0.990]), time on IMV (OR [95% CI]: 1.103 [1.059-1.149]), and driving pressure (OR [95% CI]: 3.750 [1.344-10.466]), regardless of gender and comorbidities. Mortality was higher in the WF group (WF: 69% vs. WS: 24%; p < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Advanced age, the length of hospitalization, prolonged IMV duration, and compromised respiratory mechanics were the predictors of WF. Furthermore, individuals who experienced WF presented a higher mortality rate compared with those who successfully weaned.</p>","PeriodicalId":46434,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary Medicine","volume":"2026 1","pages":"e9316439"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2026-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13080263/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/pm/9316439","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: During the COVID-19 pandemic, a significant number of affected individuals experienced acute respiratory failure requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Once IMV becomes necessary, substantial efforts are made to conduct a successful ventilatory weaning process and prevent deleterious effects associated with prolonged positive pressure use. Identifying the clinical characteristics of COVID-19 patients who experienced failure in ventilatory weaning can provide insights to optimize ventilatory management.

Aim: This study is aimed at identifying predictors of weaning failure (WF) from IMV in patients with COVID-19 and their association with mortality.

Methods: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data obtained from medical records, including personal and clinical information, IMV parameters, ventilatory mechanics, IMV duration, hospital and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and discharge or death date. All COVID-19 patients admitted between March 2020 and July 2022, aged ≥ 18 years, and requiring IMV were included. Patients were categorized into three groups: weaning success (WS), WF, and no criteria for weaning (NCW). Success was defined as orotracheal prosthesis removal without reintubation within 48 h or, for tracheostomized patients, disconnection from mechanical ventilation for ≥ 48 h.

Results: A total of 2.198 individuals were included, of whom 528 (age 52 [39-61] years, 195 men, and body mass index 29 [26-34] kg/m2) met the criteria for weaning and were analyzed (WS: n = 380, 195 men; WF: n = 148, 89 men). Individuals in the WS group were younger (WS: 52 [39-61] vs. WF: 56 [47-67] years; p < 0.0001) and had shorter ICU stay (WS: 16 [10-27] vs. WF: 29 [14-45] days; p < 0.0001) and IMV duration (WS: 12 [7-20] vs. WF: 25 [14-37] days; p < 0.0001). Independent predictors of WF included age (OR [95% CI]: 1.028 [1.005-1.052]), length of hospital stay (OR [95% CI]: 0.963 [0.937-0.990]), time on IMV (OR [95% CI]: 1.103 [1.059-1.149]), and driving pressure (OR [95% CI]: 3.750 [1.344-10.466]), regardless of gender and comorbidities. Mortality was higher in the WF group (WF: 69% vs. WS: 24%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion: Advanced age, the length of hospitalization, prolonged IMV duration, and compromised respiratory mechanics were the predictors of WF. Furthermore, individuals who experienced WF presented a higher mortality rate compared with those who successfully weaned.

有创机械通气患者脱机失败和死亡率的临床预测因素:一项回顾性队列研究
背景:在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间,大量受影响个体出现急性呼吸衰竭,需要有创机械通气(IMV)。一旦IMV成为必要,就需要作出大量努力来进行成功的通气脱机过程,并防止与长时间正压使用相关的有害影响。明确新冠肺炎患者脱机失败的临床特征,可为优化通气管理提供参考。目的:本研究旨在确定COVID-19患者IMV导致断奶失败(WF)的预测因素及其与死亡率的关系。方法:回顾性队列研究分析了病历资料,包括个人和临床信息、IMV参数、通气力学、IMV持续时间、住院和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间、出院或死亡日期。纳入2020年3月至2022年7月期间入院的所有年龄≥18岁且需要IMV的COVID-19患者。患者被分为三组:断奶成功(WS), WF和无标准断奶(NCW)。成功的定义是在48小时内取出口气管假体而不重新插管,对于气管造口术患者,脱离机械通气≥48小时。结果:共纳入受试者2.198例,其中528例(年龄52[39-61]岁,男性195例,体重指数29 [26-34]kg/m2)符合断奶标准(WS: n = 380, 195例;WF: n = 148, 89例)。WS组患者更年轻(WS: 52[39-61]比WF: 56[47-67]岁,p < 0.0001), ICU住院时间更短(WS: 16[10-27]比WF: 29[14-45]天,p < 0.0001), IMV持续时间更短(WS: 12[7-20]比WF: 25[14-37]天,p < 0.0001)。WF的独立预测因子包括年龄(OR [95% CI]: 1.028[1.005-1.052])、住院时间(OR [95% CI]: 0.963[0.937-0.990])、IMV使用时间(OR [95% CI]: 1.103[1.059-1.149])和驾驶压力(OR [95% CI]: 3.750[1.344-10.466]),与性别和合并症无关。WF组死亡率较高(WF: 69% vs. WS: 24%; p < 0.0001)。结论:高龄、住院时间、IMV持续时间延长和呼吸力学受损是WF的预测因素。此外,与成功断奶的个体相比,经历过WF的个体死亡率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pulmonary Medicine
Pulmonary Medicine RESPIRATORY SYSTEM-
CiteScore
10.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
14 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书