Mahesh Kumar Khanal, Peter Saunders, Kathy Nguyen, Moza Al Hatmi, Hind Mohammed A Asiri, Wejdan Shahin, Rebecca Millar, Leila Karimi, Barbora de Courten
{"title":"Meditation and workplace health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of mental and cardiometabolic outcomes among employees.","authors":"Mahesh Kumar Khanal, Peter Saunders, Kathy Nguyen, Moza Al Hatmi, Hind Mohammed A Asiri, Wejdan Shahin, Rebecca Millar, Leila Karimi, Barbora de Courten","doi":"10.1080/17437199.2026.2652892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Employees are severely affected by psychological distress, poor cardiometabolic health, and reduced productivity. Meditation has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance overall health. This systematic review synthesised the effectiveness of meditation for improving employees' mental health and cardiometabolic risk (CMR) markers across 132 randomised controlled trials (145 intervention groups and 23,080 participants). Most interventions were Mindfulness and Transcendental Meditation, conducted in the USA, and targeting healthcare professionals and educators. Results showed that meditation significantly improved perceived stress (<i>g</i> = -0.51), distress (<i>g</i> = -0.49), job stress (<i>g</i> = -0.53), anxiety (<i>g</i> = -0.38), depression (<i>g</i> = -0.39), well-being (<i>g</i> = 0.41), resilience (<i>g</i> = 0.38), and sleep (<i>g</i> = -0.33), with most effects sustained within three-month follow-ups. Effects on perceived stress, distress, and well-being were sustained at long-term follow-up. Interventions did not show statistically significant differences in blood pressure, cortisol level, heart rate variability, or inflammatory markers. The findings require cautious interpretation due to moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity, high risk of bias, and limited CMR marker studies. The evidence certainty was moderate for well-being and sleep, and low to very low for the remaining outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":48034,"journal":{"name":"Health Psychology Review","volume":" ","pages":"1-30"},"PeriodicalIF":9.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Psychology Review","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2026.2652892","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Employees are severely affected by psychological distress, poor cardiometabolic health, and reduced productivity. Meditation has emerged as a potential strategy to enhance overall health. This systematic review synthesised the effectiveness of meditation for improving employees' mental health and cardiometabolic risk (CMR) markers across 132 randomised controlled trials (145 intervention groups and 23,080 participants). Most interventions were Mindfulness and Transcendental Meditation, conducted in the USA, and targeting healthcare professionals and educators. Results showed that meditation significantly improved perceived stress (g = -0.51), distress (g = -0.49), job stress (g = -0.53), anxiety (g = -0.38), depression (g = -0.39), well-being (g = 0.41), resilience (g = 0.38), and sleep (g = -0.33), with most effects sustained within three-month follow-ups. Effects on perceived stress, distress, and well-being were sustained at long-term follow-up. Interventions did not show statistically significant differences in blood pressure, cortisol level, heart rate variability, or inflammatory markers. The findings require cautious interpretation due to moderate-to-substantial heterogeneity, high risk of bias, and limited CMR marker studies. The evidence certainty was moderate for well-being and sleep, and low to very low for the remaining outcomes.
期刊介绍:
The publication of Health Psychology Review (HPR) marks a significant milestone in the field of health psychology, as it is the first review journal dedicated to this important and rapidly growing discipline. Edited by a highly respected team, HPR provides a critical platform for the review, development of theories, and conceptual advancements in health psychology. This prestigious international forum not only contributes to the progress of health psychology but also fosters its connection with the broader field of psychology and other related academic and professional domains. With its vital insights, HPR is a must-read for those involved in the study, teaching, and practice of health psychology, behavioral medicine, and related areas.