Social Media, Medical Students, and Patient Exposure: Perceptions and Attitudes.

IF 0.6 Q4 MEDICAL ETHICS
Ana Paula Corrêa Meira, Carlos Costa, Ivone Maria Resende Figueiredo Duarte, Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes
{"title":"Social Media, Medical Students, and Patient Exposure: Perceptions and Attitudes.","authors":"Ana Paula Corrêa Meira, Carlos Costa, Ivone Maria Resende Figueiredo Duarte, Rui Manuel Lopes Nunes","doi":"10.1177/00243639261435830","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The expansion of social media has intensified ethical risks associated with the improper exposure of patients, requiring in-depth reflection on the behavior of students and health professionals in the online environment. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe the perceived frequency, attributed severity, and attitudes of medical students towards breaches of confidentiality on social media. An observational, cross-sectional, and exploratory study was conducted with 854 students from the south Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, using a structured questionnaire. Approximately one-quarter of the sample perceived such violations as frequent among students and physicians, and between 18% and 24% considered them to be of low severity, with evidence of habituation to infractions over the course of medical training. The current standards were predominantly assessed as unclear, ineffective, and insufficiently disseminated. It is concluded that there are substantial gaps between formal ethical knowledge and its practical application, requiring continuing education and institutional strategies to strengthen digital responsibility.</p>","PeriodicalId":44238,"journal":{"name":"Linacre Quarterly","volume":" ","pages":"00243639261435830"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13076440/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linacre Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639261435830","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of social media has intensified ethical risks associated with the improper exposure of patients, requiring in-depth reflection on the behavior of students and health professionals in the online environment. The aim of this cross-sectional study was to describe the perceived frequency, attributed severity, and attitudes of medical students towards breaches of confidentiality on social media. An observational, cross-sectional, and exploratory study was conducted with 854 students from the south Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul, using a structured questionnaire. Approximately one-quarter of the sample perceived such violations as frequent among students and physicians, and between 18% and 24% considered them to be of low severity, with evidence of habituation to infractions over the course of medical training. The current standards were predominantly assessed as unclear, ineffective, and insufficiently disseminated. It is concluded that there are substantial gaps between formal ethical knowledge and its practical application, requiring continuing education and institutional strategies to strengthen digital responsibility.

社交媒体,医学生和病人暴露:感知和态度。
社交媒体的扩张加剧了与患者不当暴露相关的伦理风险,需要对学生和卫生专业人员在网络环境中的行为进行深入反思。本横断面研究的目的是描述医学生对社交媒体上违反保密行为的感知频率、归因于的严重程度和态度。采用结构化问卷,对来自巴西南部南巴西大州的854名学生进行了一项观察性、横断面性和探索性研究。大约四分之一的样本认为学生和医生经常发生此类违规行为,18%至24%的样本认为其严重程度较低,有证据表明在医疗培训过程中已经习惯了违规行为。目前的标准主要被评价为不明确、无效和传播不足。结论是,在正式的道德知识与其实际应用之间存在着巨大的差距,需要继续教育和制度战略来加强数字责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Linacre Quarterly
Linacre Quarterly MEDICAL ETHICS-
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
40.00%
发文量
57
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书