[Lapidus arthrodesis combined with middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus with metatarsus adductus].

Q3 Medicine
Lin Shang, Zhiqiang Lü, Shijun Zhao, Litao Chu, Chenqi Li, Fu Gao, Junjie Lu, Wei Zhang
{"title":"[Lapidus arthrodesis combined with middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy in treatment of hallux valgus with metatarsus adductus].","authors":"Lin Shang, Zhiqiang Lü, Shijun Zhao, Litao Chu, Chenqi Li, Fu Gao, Junjie Lu, Wei Zhang","doi":"10.7507/1002-1892.202509084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To explore effectiveness of the Lapidus arthrodesis combined with the middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus (HV) with metatarsus adductus (MA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Between February 2023 and September 2024, 18 patients (18 feet) of HV with MA were underwent Lapidus arthrodesis combined with the middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy. There were 5 males and 13 females with an age of 50-68 years (mean, 55.3 years). The foot deformity was characterized by severe HV, redness and swelling at the utricle, and the corpus callosum on the plantar side of the forefoot. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 44.2±3.8 and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.1±0.9 after walking 1 km. The AOFAS score and VAS score were adopted to evaluate the postoperative function of the foot. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured after operation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 18 months). At last follow-up, the AOFAS score and VAS score after walking 1 km were 84.2±3.9 and 2.0±0.8, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores ( <i>P</i><0.05). Imaging review showed that the osteotomy sites all healed, with a healing time of (10.25±2.15) weeks. At last follow-up, the HVA, MAA, IMA, and DMAA were significantly lower than preoperative ones ( <i>P</i><0.05). During follow-up, all patients exhibited diffuse swelling of the feet, 10 patients experienced stiffness in the great toe, 1 foot showed numbness caused by medial plantar cutaneous nerve injury, and 1 foot of skin irritation caused by internal fixation.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For HV with MA, the Lapidus arthrodesis combined with middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy can effectively correct deformity and relieve pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":23979,"journal":{"name":"中国修复重建外科杂志","volume":"40 4","pages":"578-583"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13096820/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"中国修复重建外科杂志","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7507/1002-1892.202509084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To explore effectiveness of the Lapidus arthrodesis combined with the middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy in the treatment of hallux valgus (HV) with metatarsus adductus (MA).

Methods: Between February 2023 and September 2024, 18 patients (18 feet) of HV with MA were underwent Lapidus arthrodesis combined with the middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy. There were 5 males and 13 females with an age of 50-68 years (mean, 55.3 years). The foot deformity was characterized by severe HV, redness and swelling at the utricle, and the corpus callosum on the plantar side of the forefoot. The preoperative American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) score was 44.2±3.8 and visual analogue scale (VAS) score was 7.1±0.9 after walking 1 km. The AOFAS score and VAS score were adopted to evaluate the postoperative function of the foot. The hallux valgus angle (HVA), metatarsus adductus angle (MAA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and distal metatarsal articular angle (DMAA) were measured after operation.

Results: All incisions healed by first intention. All patients were followed up 12-26 months (mean, 18 months). At last follow-up, the AOFAS score and VAS score after walking 1 km were 84.2±3.9 and 2.0±0.8, respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores ( P<0.05). Imaging review showed that the osteotomy sites all healed, with a healing time of (10.25±2.15) weeks. At last follow-up, the HVA, MAA, IMA, and DMAA were significantly lower than preoperative ones ( P<0.05). During follow-up, all patients exhibited diffuse swelling of the feet, 10 patients experienced stiffness in the great toe, 1 foot showed numbness caused by medial plantar cutaneous nerve injury, and 1 foot of skin irritation caused by internal fixation.

Conclusion: For HV with MA, the Lapidus arthrodesis combined with middle metatarsal base rotation osteotomy can effectively correct deformity and relieve pain.

[Lapidus关节融合术联合中跖底旋转截骨术治疗拇外翻伴跖内收]。
目的:探讨Lapidus关节融合术联合跖中底旋转截骨术治疗拇外翻合并跖内收(MA)的疗效。方法:于2023年2月至2024年9月,对18例(18英尺)HV合并MA患者行拉皮肌关节融合术联合中跖骨基底旋转截骨术。男性5例,女性13例,年龄50 ~ 68岁,平均55.3岁。足部畸形的特征是严重的HV,小囊红肿,前脚足底侧胼胝体。术前步行1 km后,美国骨科足踝学会(AOFAS)评分为44.2±3.8,视觉模拟评分(VAS)评分为7.1±0.9。采用AOFAS评分和VAS评分评价术后足部功能。术后测量拇外翻角(HVA)、跖内收角(MAA)、跖间角(IMA)、跖远端关节角(DMAA)。结果:所有切口一期愈合。所有患者随访12-26个月(平均18个月)。最后随访时,行走1 km后的AOFAS评分为84.2±3.9分,VAS评分为2.0±0.8分,与术前比较差异有统计学意义(ppp)。结论:对于HV合并MA,拉阔肌关节融合术联合中跖底旋转截骨术能有效矫正畸形,缓解疼痛。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
中国修复重建外科杂志
中国修复重建外科杂志 Medicine-Medicine (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11334
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书