Commercial AI Model Diagnostic Accuracy for Intracranial Large- and Medium-Vessel Occlusion at Emergency CT Angiography.

IF 13.2 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Henrik Andersson, Björn Hansen, Johan Wassélius
{"title":"Commercial AI Model Diagnostic Accuracy for Intracranial Large- and Medium-Vessel Occlusion at Emergency CT Angiography.","authors":"Henrik Andersson, Björn Hansen, Johan Wassélius","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic accuracy of AIDOC-VO, the first commercial artificial intelligence (AI) tool for intracranial large- and medium-vessel occlusion (LVO and MeVO) detection at head and neck CT angiography (CTA), was evaluated in a multicenter emergency setting. A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study of 3031 adult CTA examinations (mean age ± SD, 67.3 years ± 16.4; 1549 females) acquired March-July 2024 across a 10-hospital region was performed. The AI model was compared with clinical radiology reporting. Examinations flagged positive or doubt by either the AI model or report underwent blinded rereading for reference-standard establishment. Of 3031 CTA examinations, valid AI model output was yielded for 2804 (92.5%), of which 224 of 2804 (8.0%) had vessel occlusion (VO) on reference-standard reading. For VO detection within intended use (218 of 224), sensitivity was 81.7% (178 of 218) (clinical report: 81.2% [177 of 218]; <i>P</i> = .91), and specificity was 99.6% (2569 of 2580) (clinical report: 99.3% [2561 of 2580]; <i>P</i> = .12). LVO sensitivity was 92.8% (64 of 69) (clinical report: 87.0% [60 of 69]; <i>P</i> = .42) and MeVO sensitivity was 76.1% (121 of 159) (clinical report: 79.2% [126 of 159]; <i>P</i> = .55). The AI model identified VOs missed by radiologists in 42 examinations, for an enhanced detection rate of 18.8% (42 of 224; 15 per 1000 CT angiograms), and generated 11 false alerts (3.9 per 1000 CT angiograms). Performance did not differ significantly from clinical radiology reporting. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, CT-Angiography, CNS, Ischemia/Infarction, Stroke, Diagnosis, Classification, Application Domain, Arteries, Artificial Intelligence, Large Vessel Occlusion, Medium Vessel Occlusion <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e250749"},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The diagnostic accuracy of AIDOC-VO, the first commercial artificial intelligence (AI) tool for intracranial large- and medium-vessel occlusion (LVO and MeVO) detection at head and neck CT angiography (CTA), was evaluated in a multicenter emergency setting. A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study of 3031 adult CTA examinations (mean age ± SD, 67.3 years ± 16.4; 1549 females) acquired March-July 2024 across a 10-hospital region was performed. The AI model was compared with clinical radiology reporting. Examinations flagged positive or doubt by either the AI model or report underwent blinded rereading for reference-standard establishment. Of 3031 CTA examinations, valid AI model output was yielded for 2804 (92.5%), of which 224 of 2804 (8.0%) had vessel occlusion (VO) on reference-standard reading. For VO detection within intended use (218 of 224), sensitivity was 81.7% (178 of 218) (clinical report: 81.2% [177 of 218]; P = .91), and specificity was 99.6% (2569 of 2580) (clinical report: 99.3% [2561 of 2580]; P = .12). LVO sensitivity was 92.8% (64 of 69) (clinical report: 87.0% [60 of 69]; P = .42) and MeVO sensitivity was 76.1% (121 of 159) (clinical report: 79.2% [126 of 159]; P = .55). The AI model identified VOs missed by radiologists in 42 examinations, for an enhanced detection rate of 18.8% (42 of 224; 15 per 1000 CT angiograms), and generated 11 false alerts (3.9 per 1000 CT angiograms). Performance did not differ significantly from clinical radiology reporting. Keywords: CT, CT-Angiography, CNS, Ischemia/Infarction, Stroke, Diagnosis, Classification, Application Domain, Arteries, Artificial Intelligence, Large Vessel Occlusion, Medium Vessel Occlusion Supplemental material is available for this article. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.

商用AI模型在急诊CT血管造影中诊断颅内大、中血管闭塞的准确性。
aidoco - vo是首个用于头颈部CT血管造影(CTA)检测颅内大、中血管闭塞(LVO/MeVO)的商用人工智能工具,在多中心急诊环境中进行了诊断准确性评估。对2024年3月至7月在10家医院地区获得的3031张成人CT血管造影图像(平均年龄67.3岁±16.4 [SD]; 1549名女性)进行了前瞻性诊断准确性研究。将人工智能模型与临床放射学报告进行比较。人工智能模型或报告标记为阳性或怀疑的检查进行盲法重读,以建立参考标准。在3031张CT血管图中,2804张(92.5%)得到有效的AI模型输出,其中224/ 2804张(8.0%)在参考标准读数上存在血管闭塞(VO)。对于预定用途(218/224)的VO检测,敏感性为81.7%(178/218)(临床报告:81.2% [177/218];P = 0.91),特异性为99.6%(2569 / 2580)(临床报告:99.3% [2561 / 2580];P = 0.12)。LVO敏感性为92.8%(64/69)(临床报告:87.0% [60/69],P = 0.42), MeVO敏感性为76.1%(121/159)(临床报告:79.2% [126/159],P = 0.55)。人工智能模型识别了放射科医生在42次检查中遗漏的VOs,检出率提高了18.8%(42/224;每1000张CT血管图15张),并产生了11次虚假警报(每1000张CT血管图3.9张)。表现与临床放射学报告无显著差异。©RSNA, 2026年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.20
自引率
1.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Radiology: Artificial Intelligence is a bi-monthly publication that focuses on the emerging applications of machine learning and artificial intelligence in the field of imaging across various disciplines. This journal is available online and accepts multiple manuscript types, including Original Research, Technical Developments, Data Resources, Review articles, Editorials, Letters to the Editor and Replies, Special Reports, and AI in Brief.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书