求助PDF
{"title":"Commercial AI Model Diagnostic Accuracy for Intracranial Large- and Medium-Vessel Occlusion at Emergency CT Angiography.","authors":"Henrik Andersson, Björn Hansen, Johan Wassélius","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The diagnostic accuracy of AIDOC-VO, the first commercial artificial intelligence (AI) tool for intracranial large- and medium-vessel occlusion (LVO and MeVO) detection at head and neck CT angiography (CTA), was evaluated in a multicenter emergency setting. A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study of 3031 adult CTA examinations (mean age ± SD, 67.3 years ± 16.4; 1549 females) acquired March-July 2024 across a 10-hospital region was performed. The AI model was compared with clinical radiology reporting. Examinations flagged positive or doubt by either the AI model or report underwent blinded rereading for reference-standard establishment. Of 3031 CTA examinations, valid AI model output was yielded for 2804 (92.5%), of which 224 of 2804 (8.0%) had vessel occlusion (VO) on reference-standard reading. For VO detection within intended use (218 of 224), sensitivity was 81.7% (178 of 218) (clinical report: 81.2% [177 of 218]; <i>P</i> = .91), and specificity was 99.6% (2569 of 2580) (clinical report: 99.3% [2561 of 2580]; <i>P</i> = .12). LVO sensitivity was 92.8% (64 of 69) (clinical report: 87.0% [60 of 69]; <i>P</i> = .42) and MeVO sensitivity was 76.1% (121 of 159) (clinical report: 79.2% [126 of 159]; <i>P</i> = .55). The AI model identified VOs missed by radiologists in 42 examinations, for an enhanced detection rate of 18.8% (42 of 224; 15 per 1000 CT angiograms), and generated 11 false alerts (3.9 per 1000 CT angiograms). Performance did not differ significantly from clinical radiology reporting. <b>Keywords:</b> CT, CT-Angiography, CNS, Ischemia/Infarction, Stroke, Diagnosis, Classification, Application Domain, Arteries, Artificial Intelligence, Large Vessel Occlusion, Medium Vessel Occlusion <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e250749"},"PeriodicalIF":13.2000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250749","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
The diagnostic accuracy of AIDOC-VO, the first commercial artificial intelligence (AI) tool for intracranial large- and medium-vessel occlusion (LVO and MeVO) detection at head and neck CT angiography (CTA), was evaluated in a multicenter emergency setting. A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study of 3031 adult CTA examinations (mean age ± SD, 67.3 years ± 16.4; 1549 females) acquired March-July 2024 across a 10-hospital region was performed. The AI model was compared with clinical radiology reporting. Examinations flagged positive or doubt by either the AI model or report underwent blinded rereading for reference-standard establishment. Of 3031 CTA examinations, valid AI model output was yielded for 2804 (92.5%), of which 224 of 2804 (8.0%) had vessel occlusion (VO) on reference-standard reading. For VO detection within intended use (218 of 224), sensitivity was 81.7% (178 of 218) (clinical report: 81.2% [177 of 218]; P = .91), and specificity was 99.6% (2569 of 2580) (clinical report: 99.3% [2561 of 2580]; P = .12). LVO sensitivity was 92.8% (64 of 69) (clinical report: 87.0% [60 of 69]; P = .42) and MeVO sensitivity was 76.1% (121 of 159) (clinical report: 79.2% [126 of 159]; P = .55). The AI model identified VOs missed by radiologists in 42 examinations, for an enhanced detection rate of 18.8% (42 of 224; 15 per 1000 CT angiograms), and generated 11 false alerts (3.9 per 1000 CT angiograms). Performance did not differ significantly from clinical radiology reporting. Keywords: CT, CT-Angiography, CNS, Ischemia/Infarction, Stroke, Diagnosis, Classification, Application Domain, Arteries, Artificial Intelligence, Large Vessel Occlusion, Medium Vessel Occlusion Supplemental material is available for this article. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.
商用AI模型在急诊CT血管造影中诊断颅内大、中血管闭塞的准确性。
aidoco - vo是首个用于头颈部CT血管造影(CTA)检测颅内大、中血管闭塞(LVO/MeVO)的商用人工智能工具,在多中心急诊环境中进行了诊断准确性评估。对2024年3月至7月在10家医院地区获得的3031张成人CT血管造影图像(平均年龄67.3岁±16.4 [SD]; 1549名女性)进行了前瞻性诊断准确性研究。将人工智能模型与临床放射学报告进行比较。人工智能模型或报告标记为阳性或怀疑的检查进行盲法重读,以建立参考标准。在3031张CT血管图中,2804张(92.5%)得到有效的AI模型输出,其中224/ 2804张(8.0%)在参考标准读数上存在血管闭塞(VO)。对于预定用途(218/224)的VO检测,敏感性为81.7%(178/218)(临床报告:81.2% [177/218];P = 0.91),特异性为99.6%(2569 / 2580)(临床报告:99.3% [2561 / 2580];P = 0.12)。LVO敏感性为92.8%(64/69)(临床报告:87.0% [60/69],P = 0.42), MeVO敏感性为76.1%(121/159)(临床报告:79.2% [126/159],P = 0.55)。人工智能模型识别了放射科医生在42次检查中遗漏的VOs,检出率提高了18.8%(42/224;每1000张CT血管图15张),并产生了11次虚假警报(每1000张CT血管图3.9张)。表现与临床放射学报告无显著差异。©RSNA, 2026年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。