Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Automated Radiology Impression Generation: A Multicenter Evaluation.
IF 20.1
Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Mingyang Li, Yaning Wang, Zheng Miao, Jiaqi Gong, Simin Yang, Han Xue, Qi Yang, Lijun Duan, Lin Mu, Ying Mu, Kai Zhu, Qi Dai, Munire Aihemaiti, Yunhui Yang, Liang Liu, Yingyan Zheng, Yang Hou, Lei Zhang, Jing Wang, Huimao Zhang
求助PDF
{"title":"Fine-Tuned Large Language Model for Automated Radiology Impression Generation: A Multicenter Evaluation.","authors":"Mingyang Li, Yaning Wang, Zheng Miao, Jiaqi Gong, Simin Yang, Han Xue, Qi Yang, Lijun Duan, Lin Mu, Ying Mu, Kai Zhu, Qi Dai, Munire Aihemaiti, Yunhui Yang, Liang Liu, Yingyan Zheng, Yang Hou, Lei Zhang, Jing Wang, Huimao Zhang","doi":"10.1148/ryai.250714","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Purpose To develop a fine-tuned large language model (Medical Imaging Report Assistant [MIRA]) and evaluate its performance in generating radiology impressions from multicenter data with respect to accuracy, reporting efficiency, and clinical applicability. Materials and Methods A retrospective multicenter dataset comprising 1.87 million radiology reports (including CT, MRI, and digital radiography data) from 42 hospitals across 22 provinces in China (January 2019-August 2024) was compiled. The dataset was used to fine-tune a large language model via a prompt-based strategy. The evaluation framework incorporated both automated and human evaluation metrics. Radiologists evaluated internal and external datasets and three open-source datasets to compare impressions generated by the fine-tuned large language model and GPT-4o (Open AI). Twenty-four radiologists from six centers performed blinded comparisons of MIRA-generated and reference impressions to assess interrater consistency and drafting efficiency. Data were analyzed using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests and χ<sup>2</sup> tests, with Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results The internal test set included data for 78 544 reports (median age, 52 years; IQR, 35-65 years; 39 351 male), and the external test set included data for 27 471 reports (median age, 53 years; IQR, 37-66 years; 13 955 male). Site- and modality-aware prompting improved similarity (internal BERTScore F1 and sentence similarity, 0.92 and 0.92, respectively; external BERTScore F1 and sentence similarity, 0.82 and 0.80, respectively, under optimal settings; <i>P</i> < .001). Human evaluation (<i>n</i> = 2327) showed MIRA beat GPT-4o on both similarity and F1 score (<i>P</i> < .001). MIRA-generated impressions were rated as at least as good as the reference impressions in 69.0% (1657 of 2400) of blinded comparisons, reduced draft time by 0.46 minutes per report, and increased interradiologist agreement (<i>P</i> < .001). Conclusion MIRA, a fine-tuned large language model using a prompt-based strategy, generated clinically aligned radiology impressions in multicenter settings, improving accuracy, efficiency, and reporting consistency. <b>Keywords:</b> Computer-aided Diagnosis, CAD, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Conventional Radiography, MRI, Computer Applications-General Informatics, Statistics <i>Supplemental material is available for this article.</i> © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.</p>","PeriodicalId":29787,"journal":{"name":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","volume":" ","pages":"e250714"},"PeriodicalIF":20.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology-Artificial Intelligence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1148/ryai.250714","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
引用
批量引用
Abstract
Purpose To develop a fine-tuned large language model (Medical Imaging Report Assistant [MIRA]) and evaluate its performance in generating radiology impressions from multicenter data with respect to accuracy, reporting efficiency, and clinical applicability. Materials and Methods A retrospective multicenter dataset comprising 1.87 million radiology reports (including CT, MRI, and digital radiography data) from 42 hospitals across 22 provinces in China (January 2019-August 2024) was compiled. The dataset was used to fine-tune a large language model via a prompt-based strategy. The evaluation framework incorporated both automated and human evaluation metrics. Radiologists evaluated internal and external datasets and three open-source datasets to compare impressions generated by the fine-tuned large language model and GPT-4o (Open AI). Twenty-four radiologists from six centers performed blinded comparisons of MIRA-generated and reference impressions to assess interrater consistency and drafting efficiency. Data were analyzed using appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests and χ2 tests, with Holm-Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Results The internal test set included data for 78 544 reports (median age, 52 years; IQR, 35-65 years; 39 351 male), and the external test set included data for 27 471 reports (median age, 53 years; IQR, 37-66 years; 13 955 male). Site- and modality-aware prompting improved similarity (internal BERTScore F1 and sentence similarity, 0.92 and 0.92, respectively; external BERTScore F1 and sentence similarity, 0.82 and 0.80, respectively, under optimal settings; P < .001). Human evaluation (n = 2327) showed MIRA beat GPT-4o on both similarity and F1 score (P < .001). MIRA-generated impressions were rated as at least as good as the reference impressions in 69.0% (1657 of 2400) of blinded comparisons, reduced draft time by 0.46 minutes per report, and increased interradiologist agreement (P < .001). Conclusion MIRA, a fine-tuned large language model using a prompt-based strategy, generated clinically aligned radiology impressions in multicenter settings, improving accuracy, efficiency, and reporting consistency. Keywords: Computer-aided Diagnosis, CAD, Supervised Learning, Transfer Learning, Conventional Radiography, MRI, Computer Applications-General Informatics, Statistics Supplemental material is available for this article. © The Author(s) 2026. Published by the Radiological Society of North America under a CC BY 4.0 license.
微调大语言模型自动放射学印象生成:多中心评估。
目的:开发一种精细的大型语言模型(医学影像报告助手,MIRA),并评估其在从多中心数据生成放射影像的准确性、报告效率和临床适用性方面的表现。材料与方法回顾性多中心数据集,包括2019年1月至2024年8月来自中国22个省份42家医院的187万份放射学报告(包括CT、MRI和数字放射学数据)。该数据集用于通过基于提示的策略对LLM进行微调。评估框架结合了自动化和人工评估度量。放射科医生评估了内部和外部数据集以及三个开源数据集,以比较微调后的LLM和gpt - 40产生的印象。来自6个中心的24名放射科医生对MIRA生成的印象和参考印象进行了盲法比较,以评估解读器的一致性和起草效率。数据分析采用适当的参数/非参数检验和χ2检验,多重比较采用Holm-Bonferroni校正。结果内测集纳入报告78,544份,中位年龄52岁[IQR, 35-65],男性39,351份;外测集纳入报告27,471份,中位年龄53岁[IQR, 37-66],男性13,955份。站点/模式感知提示提高了句子相似度(P < 0.001):优化设置下,内部BERTScore-F/句子相似度为0.92/0.92,外部为0.82/0.80;人类评估(n = 2327)显示MIRA在相似性和F1评分上都优于gpt - 40 (P < 0.001)。在69.0%的盲法比较(1,657/2,400)中,mira生成的印象至少与参考印象一样好,每个报告的起草时间减少了0.46分钟,并且增加了放射科医师之间的一致性(P < 0.001)。MIRA是一种微调的LLM,使用基于提示的策略,在多中心环境中产生临床对齐的放射学印象,提高了准确性、效率和报告一致性。©作者2026。由北美放射学会在CC by 4.0许可下发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。