The Effect of Relevance on Children's Multiple Text Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.

IF 2.1 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tuomo Häikiö, Oksana Kanerva, Norbert Erdmann, Mirjamaija Mikkilä-Erdmann, Johanna K Kaakinen
{"title":"The Effect of Relevance on Children's Multiple Text Reading: Evidence From Eye Movements.","authors":"Tuomo Häikiö, Oksana Kanerva, Norbert Erdmann, Mirjamaija Mikkilä-Erdmann, Johanna K Kaakinen","doi":"10.1111/sjop.70099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We examined how Finnish children read and integrate information across multiple expository texts when given an inquiry task. We were interested in how task-relevance of text information affects readers' eye movements and whether the eye movements are connected to the quality of an essay written after reading. We were also interested in differentiating between the effects of technical reading skill and reading comprehension in respect to these processes. In total, 24 5th and 6th grade Finnish native-speakers completed the experiment. Prior to testing, the participants were told that at the end of the testing session, they would have to complete an inquiry task (e.g., \"What's the difference between human and dog hearing?\"). During an eye tracking experiment, the participants read two science texts on the topic of the inquiry task. The texts contained both task-relevant and task-irrelevant text segments. After the reading task, the children wrote an essay to complete the inquiry task. Furthermore, participants' technical reading skill and reading comprehension were measured with an independent classroom test. It was shown that the task-relevant segments were read longer than the task-irrelevant segments during first-pass reading. Moreover, reading skills modulated the effect of relevance, as weaker comprehenders were less likely to regress within an irrelevant segment. Furthermore, the relevance effect was more pronounced for the better technical readers with respect to look-backs. No reliable effects were found for the essay-writing task. The results imply that the participants were able to detect which parts of the text were relevant and adjusted their reading accordingly, based on their reading skills. However, they did not seem to form a coherent memory representation of the relevant text contents in order to perform well in the essay writing task.</p>","PeriodicalId":21435,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/sjop.70099","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examined how Finnish children read and integrate information across multiple expository texts when given an inquiry task. We were interested in how task-relevance of text information affects readers' eye movements and whether the eye movements are connected to the quality of an essay written after reading. We were also interested in differentiating between the effects of technical reading skill and reading comprehension in respect to these processes. In total, 24 5th and 6th grade Finnish native-speakers completed the experiment. Prior to testing, the participants were told that at the end of the testing session, they would have to complete an inquiry task (e.g., "What's the difference between human and dog hearing?"). During an eye tracking experiment, the participants read two science texts on the topic of the inquiry task. The texts contained both task-relevant and task-irrelevant text segments. After the reading task, the children wrote an essay to complete the inquiry task. Furthermore, participants' technical reading skill and reading comprehension were measured with an independent classroom test. It was shown that the task-relevant segments were read longer than the task-irrelevant segments during first-pass reading. Moreover, reading skills modulated the effect of relevance, as weaker comprehenders were less likely to regress within an irrelevant segment. Furthermore, the relevance effect was more pronounced for the better technical readers with respect to look-backs. No reliable effects were found for the essay-writing task. The results imply that the participants were able to detect which parts of the text were relevant and adjusted their reading accordingly, based on their reading skills. However, they did not seem to form a coherent memory representation of the relevant text contents in order to perform well in the essay writing task.

关联对儿童多重文本阅读的影响:来自眼动的证据。
我们研究了芬兰儿童在进行探究任务时如何阅读和整合多个说明性文本中的信息。我们感兴趣的是文本信息的任务相关性如何影响读者的眼球运动,以及眼球运动是否与阅读后所写文章的质量有关。我们还对区分技术性阅读技能和阅读理解对这些过程的影响感兴趣。总共有24名以芬兰语为母语的5年级和6年级学生完成了实验。在测试之前,参与者被告知,在测试结束时,他们必须完成一项询问任务(例如,“人类和狗的听力有什么不同?”)。在眼动追踪实验中,参与者阅读了两篇关于探究任务主题的科学文章。这些文本包含与任务相关和与任务无关的文本片段。阅读任务结束后,孩子们写了一篇文章来完成探究任务。此外,通过独立的课堂测试,测试了参与者的专业阅读技能和阅读理解能力。结果表明,在第一次阅读中,与任务相关的片段比与任务无关的片段被阅读的时间更长。此外,阅读技能调节了相关性的影响,因为较弱的理解者不太可能在不相关的段落中倒退。此外,在回顾方面,相关性效应对于技术较好的读者更为明显。在论文写作任务中没有发现可靠的影响。结果表明,参与者能够发现文本的哪些部分是相关的,并根据他们的阅读技巧相应地调整他们的阅读。然而,他们似乎并没有形成相关文本内容的连贯记忆表征,以在论文写作任务中表现良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian journal of psychology
Scandinavian journal of psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: Published in association with the Nordic psychological associations, the Scandinavian Journal of Psychology publishes original papers from Scandinavia and elsewhere. Covering the whole range of psychology, with a particular focus on experimental psychology, the journal includes high-quality theoretical and methodological papers, empirical reports, reviews and ongoing commentaries.Scandinavian Journal of Psychology is organised into four standing subsections: - Cognition and Neurosciences - Development and Aging - Personality and Social Sciences - Health and Disability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书