A robust phylogenomic framework supports a revised intrafamilial classification of Urticaceae.

IF 5.9 1区 生物学 Q1 PLANT SCIENCES
Plant Diversity Pub Date : 2025-12-17 eCollection Date: 2026-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.pld.2025.12.003
Xiao-Gang Fu, Jie Liu, Richard I Milne, Alex K Monro, Shui-Yin Liu, Qin Tian, Gregory W Stull, Amos Kipkoech, Ting-Shuang Yi, De-Zhu Li, Zeng-Yuan Wu
{"title":"A robust phylogenomic framework supports a revised intrafamilial classification of Urticaceae.","authors":"Xiao-Gang Fu, Jie Liu, Richard I Milne, Alex K Monro, Shui-Yin Liu, Qin Tian, Gregory W Stull, Amos Kipkoech, Ting-Shuang Yi, De-Zhu Li, Zeng-Yuan Wu","doi":"10.1016/j.pld.2025.12.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Over the past decade, phylogenomics has significantly enhanced our understanding of relationships among numerous angiosperm lineages. However, comprehensive phylogenetic studies combining broad sampling of both genomic sequences and taxa within the nettle family (Urticaceae) are still lacking. Here, we reconstructed the phylogeny of Urticaceae (345 species across 89% of accepted genera) using concatenated and coalescent analyses from plastome and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Different plastid datasets and tree inference methods yielded a consistent phylogenetic backbone, with 98% of nodes achieving > 90% bootstrap support - a significant improvement compared to 54% of nodes in the latest published phylogenetic study of Urticaceae. Plastid and nuclear phylogenetic relationships were largely congruent, with several exceptions that warrant further study. In the context of the updated phylogenetic relationships, we propose dividing the family into seven tribes that correspond to seven major clades or subclades, including a newly established tribe, Sarcochlamydeae <i>stat. nov</i>. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that <i>Debregeasia</i> and <i>Phenax</i> are non-monophyletic. By combing morphological, molecular and distributional evidence, we describe a new genus <i>Chiajuia gen</i>. <i>nov</i>. Additionally, we propose synonymizing the following genera: <i>Cypholophus</i> (to <i>Boehmeria</i>), <i>Haroldiella</i> (to <i>Pilea</i>), <i>Hemistylus</i>, <i>Neodistemon</i>, <i>Rousselia</i> (all to <i>Pouzolzia</i>), <i>Hesperocnide</i> (to <i>Urtica</i>), and <i>Pellionia</i> (to <i>Elatostema</i>), while recognizing <i>Elatostematoides</i>, <i>Gonostegia</i>, <i>Leptocnide</i>, <i>Margarocarpus</i>, <i>Scepocarpus</i>, and <i>Sceptrocnide</i> as distinct genera. This robust phylogenomic framework and revised classification lays a foundation for future studies on the evolution and ecology of Urticaceae. The approach applied here may also serve as an important reference for other large plant families in angiosperms.</p>","PeriodicalId":20224,"journal":{"name":"Plant Diversity","volume":"48 2","pages":"289-306"},"PeriodicalIF":5.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13071455/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2025.12.003","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/3/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PLANT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over the past decade, phylogenomics has significantly enhanced our understanding of relationships among numerous angiosperm lineages. However, comprehensive phylogenetic studies combining broad sampling of both genomic sequences and taxa within the nettle family (Urticaceae) are still lacking. Here, we reconstructed the phylogeny of Urticaceae (345 species across 89% of accepted genera) using concatenated and coalescent analyses from plastome and nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Different plastid datasets and tree inference methods yielded a consistent phylogenetic backbone, with 98% of nodes achieving > 90% bootstrap support - a significant improvement compared to 54% of nodes in the latest published phylogenetic study of Urticaceae. Plastid and nuclear phylogenetic relationships were largely congruent, with several exceptions that warrant further study. In the context of the updated phylogenetic relationships, we propose dividing the family into seven tribes that correspond to seven major clades or subclades, including a newly established tribe, Sarcochlamydeae stat. nov. Our phylogenetic analysis indicates that Debregeasia and Phenax are non-monophyletic. By combing morphological, molecular and distributional evidence, we describe a new genus Chiajuia gen. nov. Additionally, we propose synonymizing the following genera: Cypholophus (to Boehmeria), Haroldiella (to Pilea), Hemistylus, Neodistemon, Rousselia (all to Pouzolzia), Hesperocnide (to Urtica), and Pellionia (to Elatostema), while recognizing Elatostematoides, Gonostegia, Leptocnide, Margarocarpus, Scepocarpus, and Sceptrocnide as distinct genera. This robust phylogenomic framework and revised classification lays a foundation for future studies on the evolution and ecology of Urticaceae. The approach applied here may also serve as an important reference for other large plant families in angiosperms.

一个健全的系统基因组框架支持修订的荨麻科家族内分类。
在过去的十年中,系统基因组学极大地增强了我们对众多被子植物谱系之间关系的理解。然而,在荨麻科(荨麻科)中,结合广泛的基因组序列和分类群的综合系统发育研究仍然缺乏。在这里,我们利用质体和核糖体DNA序列的串联和聚结分析,重建了荨麻科(345种,89%被接受的属)的系统发育。不同的质体数据集和树推理方法得到了一致的系统发育主干,98%的节点实现了> - 90%的bootstrap支持,与最新发表的荨麻科系统发育研究中54%的节点相比,这是一个显著的进步。质体和核的系统发育关系在很大程度上是一致的,有几个例外值得进一步研究。根据最新的系统发育关系,我们建议将该科划分为7个部落,对应于7个主要的分支或亚分支,包括一个新建立的部落,Sarcochlamydeae stat. 11。我们的系统发育分析表明,Debregeasia和Phenax是非单系的。结合形态学、分子和分布证据,提出了新属Chiajuia gen. 11 .的同义性:Cypholophus(与Boehmeria同义)、Haroldiella(与Pilea同义)、Hemistylus、Neodistemon、Rousselia(与Pouzolzia同义)、Hesperocnide(与Urtica同义)、Pellionia(与elatostemide同义),而Elatostematoides、Gonostegia、Leptocnide、Margarocarpus、Scepocarpus和Sceptrocnide为独立属。这一强有力的系统基因组框架和修订的分类为进一步研究荨麻科植物的进化和生态学奠定了基础。本文所采用的方法也可为被子植物中其他大型植物科提供重要的参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant Diversity
Plant Diversity Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
CiteScore
8.30
自引率
6.20%
发文量
1863
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: Plant Diversity (formerly Plant Diversity and Resources) is an international plant science journal that publishes substantial original research and review papers that advance our understanding of the past and current distribution of plants, contribute to the development of more phylogenetically accurate taxonomic classifications, present new findings on or insights into evolutionary processes and mechanisms that are of interest to the community of plant systematic and evolutionary biologists. While the focus of the journal is on biodiversity, ecology and evolution of East Asian flora, it is not limited to these topics. Applied evolutionary issues, such as climate change and conservation biology, are welcome, especially if they address conceptual problems. Theoretical papers are equally welcome. Preference is given to concise, clearly written papers focusing on precisely framed questions or hypotheses. Papers that are purely descriptive have a low chance of acceptance. Fields covered by the journal include: plant systematics and taxonomy- evolutionary developmental biology- reproductive biology- phylo- and biogeography- evolutionary ecology- population biology- conservation biology- palaeobotany- molecular evolution- comparative and evolutionary genomics- physiology- biochemistry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书