Jasmonic and salicylic acid pathways shape the rhizosphere microbiome, affecting aphid herbivory and soil-mediated insect-plant interactions in a density-dependent manner.

IF 4.7 2区 生物学 Q2 CELL BIOLOGY
Marcela Aragón, Haris Spyridis, Pieter Mostard, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marcel Dicke, Karen J Kloth
{"title":"Jasmonic and salicylic acid pathways shape the rhizosphere microbiome, affecting aphid herbivory and soil-mediated insect-plant interactions in a density-dependent manner.","authors":"Marcela Aragón, Haris Spyridis, Pieter Mostard, Michael Reichelt, Jonathan Gershenzon, Marcel Dicke, Karen J Kloth","doi":"10.1093/pcp/pcag048","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Aboveground induction of plant defense pathways can shape root-associated microbial communities. However, whether these changes are pathway-specific and how they affect plant growth and resistance remain unclear. We evaluated how induction of the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) defense pathways shapes the root microbiome of Brassica oleracea and whether these soil-mediated shifts affect plant growth and resistance to herbivory in a subsequent generation using a plant-soil feedback approach. In the conditioning phase, defense pathways were induced either through foliar application of methyl jasmonate and SA solutions or through herbivory by caterpillars (JA) and aphids (SA). Both pathways led to distinct shifts in microbial communities, with the bacterial and fungal composition varying by pathway identity and induction method. JA induction resulted in more differentially abundant amplicon sequence variants than SA induction, particularly with Proteobacteria depletion. Conversely, Planctomycetota (bacteria) and Mortierellomycota (fungi) were enriched under both pathways, suggesting that these represent general stress-responsive groups. In the feedback phase, JA- and SA-conditioned soils had no effect on resistance under high aphid pressure, whereas under low aphid density, plants grown in SA-conditioned soil exhibited reduced phloem feeding and lower aphid population development. Together, our results indicate that the benefits provided by the defense-shaped root microbiome depend on pest pressure intensity and arise from overall community shifts rather than specific taxa enrichment. Our findings underscore the complex interactions between plant defense pathways, rhizosphere microbes, and herbivores.</p>","PeriodicalId":20575,"journal":{"name":"Plant and Cell Physiology","volume":" ","pages":"1473-1488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2026-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13621220/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant and Cell Physiology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcag048","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CELL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aboveground induction of plant defense pathways can shape root-associated microbial communities. However, whether these changes are pathway-specific and how they affect plant growth and resistance remain unclear. We evaluated how induction of the jasmonic acid (JA) and salicylic acid (SA) defense pathways shapes the root microbiome of Brassica oleracea and whether these soil-mediated shifts affect plant growth and resistance to herbivory in a subsequent generation using a plant-soil feedback approach. In the conditioning phase, defense pathways were induced either through foliar application of methyl jasmonate and SA solutions or through herbivory by caterpillars (JA) and aphids (SA). Both pathways led to distinct shifts in microbial communities, with the bacterial and fungal composition varying by pathway identity and induction method. JA induction resulted in more differentially abundant amplicon sequence variants than SA induction, particularly with Proteobacteria depletion. Conversely, Planctomycetota (bacteria) and Mortierellomycota (fungi) were enriched under both pathways, suggesting that these represent general stress-responsive groups. In the feedback phase, JA- and SA-conditioned soils had no effect on resistance under high aphid pressure, whereas under low aphid density, plants grown in SA-conditioned soil exhibited reduced phloem feeding and lower aphid population development. Together, our results indicate that the benefits provided by the defense-shaped root microbiome depend on pest pressure intensity and arise from overall community shifts rather than specific taxa enrichment. Our findings underscore the complex interactions between plant defense pathways, rhizosphere microbes, and herbivores.

茉莉酸和水杨酸途径塑造根际微生物群,以密度依赖的方式影响蚜虫的食草性和土壤介导的昆虫-植物相互作用。
地上诱导植物防御途径可以形成与根相关的微生物群落。然而,这些变化是否具有通路特异性以及它们如何影响植物生长和抗性仍不清楚。我们利用植物-土壤反馈(PSF)方法评估了茉莉酸(Jasmonic Acid, JA)和水杨酸(Salicylic Acid, SA)防御通路的诱导是如何塑造甘蓝根微生物群的,以及这些土壤介导的转变是否会影响下一代植物的生长和对草食的抗性。在调节阶段,通过叶面施用茉莉酸甲酯(MeJA)和茉莉酸甲酯溶液,或通过毛虫(JA)和蚜虫(SA)的取食诱导防御途径。这两种途径都导致微生物群落的不同变化,细菌和真菌的组成因途径身份和诱导方法而异。与SA相比,JA诱导的asv丰度差异更大,尤其是变形杆菌的缺失。相反,plantomycetota(细菌)和Mortierellomycota(真菌)在这两种途径下都富集,表明它们代表了一般的应激反应群。在反馈阶段,在高蚜虫压力下,JA和sa条件下的土壤对抗性没有影响,而在低蚜虫密度下,sa条件下生长的植物韧皮部摄食减少,蚜虫种群发育减慢。总之,我们的研究结果表明,防御型根系微生物组提供的益处取决于害虫压力强度,并且来自整体群落的变化,而不是特定分类群的富集。我们的发现强调了植物防御途径、根际微生物和食草动物之间复杂的相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Plant and Cell Physiology
Plant and Cell Physiology 生物-细胞生物学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
4.10%
发文量
166
审稿时长
1.7 months
期刊介绍: Plant & Cell Physiology (PCP) was established in 1959 and is the official journal of the Japanese Society of Plant Physiologists (JSPP). The title reflects the journal''s original interest and scope to encompass research not just at the whole-organism level but also at the cellular and subcellular levels. Amongst the broad range of topics covered by this international journal, readers will find the very best original research on plant physiology, biochemistry, cell biology, molecular genetics, epigenetics, biotechnology, bioinformatics and –omics; as well as how plants respond to and interact with their environment (abiotic and biotic factors), and the biology of photosynthetic microorganisms.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书