Hänel W Eberly, Marly Aziz, F Jeffrey Lorenz, Heather K Schopper, Jessyka G Lighthall
{"title":"Does Electrical Stimulation Therapy Influence Synkinesis in Facial Paralysis? A Systematic Review.","authors":"Hänel W Eberly, Marly Aziz, F Jeffrey Lorenz, Heather K Schopper, Jessyka G Lighthall","doi":"10.1002/oto2.70231","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Facial paralysis (FP) has aesthetic, social, and functional consequences. While electrical stimulation (ES) shows promise for peripheral nerve injury, its role in FP remains controversial due to concerns about increasing synkinesis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>A literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases.</p><p><strong>Review methods: </strong>Included studies evaluated the incidence or severity of synkinesis after ES in FP patients. Extracted data included demographics, ES parameters, FP etiology, synkinesis outcomes, and treatment duration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 601 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria, comprising 243 patients (92 female, reported in 5 studies). Bell's palsy was the most common FP etiology (76.5%), followed by iatrogenic facial nerve injury (20.2%). Time to treatment ranged from 1 week to 7 years post-onset. Treatment durations varied from 2 weeks to 29 months, with inter-impulse gaps of 30 to 3000 milliseconds, phase durations of 10 to 700 milliseconds, and amplitudes of 0.5 to 27 mA. All ES was transcutaneous. Three of 5 studies reported no differences in synkinesis scores between ES and control groups. Two studies found no differences in synkinesis incidence. Only one study showed reduced synkinesis in the ES group.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study represents an up-to-date review of synkinesis in FP patients receiving ES. Evidence suggests a benefit in overall facial function for patients without significant additional risk of synkinesis. Inconsistencies in synkinesis outcomes and measurement underscore the need for further research in this area.</p>","PeriodicalId":19697,"journal":{"name":"OTO Open","volume":"10 2","pages":"e70231"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2026-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC13078372/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"OTO Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/oto2.70231","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2026/4/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Facial paralysis (FP) has aesthetic, social, and functional consequences. While electrical stimulation (ES) shows promise for peripheral nerve injury, its role in FP remains controversial due to concerns about increasing synkinesis.
Data sources: A literature review was conducted using Medline/PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science databases.
Review methods: Included studies evaluated the incidence or severity of synkinesis after ES in FP patients. Extracted data included demographics, ES parameters, FP etiology, synkinesis outcomes, and treatment duration.
Results: Of 601 identified articles, 6 met inclusion criteria, comprising 243 patients (92 female, reported in 5 studies). Bell's palsy was the most common FP etiology (76.5%), followed by iatrogenic facial nerve injury (20.2%). Time to treatment ranged from 1 week to 7 years post-onset. Treatment durations varied from 2 weeks to 29 months, with inter-impulse gaps of 30 to 3000 milliseconds, phase durations of 10 to 700 milliseconds, and amplitudes of 0.5 to 27 mA. All ES was transcutaneous. Three of 5 studies reported no differences in synkinesis scores between ES and control groups. Two studies found no differences in synkinesis incidence. Only one study showed reduced synkinesis in the ES group.
Conclusions: This study represents an up-to-date review of synkinesis in FP patients receiving ES. Evidence suggests a benefit in overall facial function for patients without significant additional risk of synkinesis. Inconsistencies in synkinesis outcomes and measurement underscore the need for further research in this area.
目的:面瘫(FP)具有美学、社会和功能方面的后果。虽然电刺激(ES)显示出周围神经损伤的希望,但由于担心联动性增加,其在FP中的作用仍然存在争议。数据来源:使用Medline/PubMed、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库进行文献综述。综述方法:纳入的研究评估了FP患者ES后联动性的发生率或严重程度。提取的数据包括人口统计学、ES参数、FP病因、综合结果和治疗时间。结果:在601篇文献中,6篇符合纳入标准,包括243例患者(92例女性,报告于5项研究)。贝尔麻痹是最常见的FP病因(76.5%),其次是医源性面神经损伤(20.2%)。治疗时间从发病后1周到7年不等。治疗时间从2周到29个月不等,脉冲间隔为30至3000毫秒,相位持续时间为10至700毫秒,振幅为0.5至27 mA。所有ES均经皮穿刺。5项研究中有3项报告ES组与对照组的联动评分无差异。两项研究没有发现联动性发生率的差异。只有一项研究显示ES组的联动性降低。结论:这项研究是对接受ES治疗的FP患者联动性的最新综述。有证据表明,在没有明显额外联动风险的患者中,整体面部功能受益。协同作用结果和测量结果的不一致性强调了在这一领域进一步研究的必要性。